Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single tantalum dental implants: a prospective pilot clinical study.

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2017-02-14 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2016.9.1S.038
M DE Francesco, E A Gobbato, D Noce, F Cavallari, A Fioretti
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single tantalum dental implants: a prospective pilot clinical study.","authors":"M DE Francesco,&nbsp;E A Gobbato,&nbsp;D Noce,&nbsp;F Cavallari,&nbsp;A Fioretti","doi":"10.11138/orl/2016.9.1S.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this prospective pilot clinical case series report was to evaluate, through a clinical and radiographic analysis, the peri-implant bone resorption of the tantalum dental implants (TMT) (Zimmer TMT, Parsippany, NJ, USA) one year after prosthetic rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty tantalum dental implants were placed in both maxillas and mandibles of 20 patients. Patients were asked to attend a radiographic and clinical follow-up and their previous clinical records and X-rays were assessed. Bone levels were calculated by digitally measuring the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant on periapical radiographs taken at surgery and after 6 and 12 months of functioning. The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess it there was a correlation between the measurement of the marginal bone loss (MBL). The Anova Test with a post-hoc analysis using Bonferroni's test was used to compare the three group (0, 6 months and 12 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total MBL for the group 0 months was 0.84 mm (SD 0.21), 6 months was 0.87 mm (SD 0.22) and for 12 months was 0.89 mm (SD 0.23). The values of the Pearson's coefficients showed that the data measurement were positively correlated. The Anova test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss can be considered physiological. Within the limits of this study it can be concluded that TMT implants have an excellent bone crest's stability, however, to have most accurate information, will be necessary extend the sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"9 Suppl 1/2016 to N 4/2016","pages":"38-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2016.9.1S.038","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.1S.038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective pilot clinical case series report was to evaluate, through a clinical and radiographic analysis, the peri-implant bone resorption of the tantalum dental implants (TMT) (Zimmer TMT, Parsippany, NJ, USA) one year after prosthetic rehabilitation.

Methods: Twenty tantalum dental implants were placed in both maxillas and mandibles of 20 patients. Patients were asked to attend a radiographic and clinical follow-up and their previous clinical records and X-rays were assessed. Bone levels were calculated by digitally measuring the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant on periapical radiographs taken at surgery and after 6 and 12 months of functioning. The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess it there was a correlation between the measurement of the marginal bone loss (MBL). The Anova Test with a post-hoc analysis using Bonferroni's test was used to compare the three group (0, 6 months and 12 months).

Results: The mean total MBL for the group 0 months was 0.84 mm (SD 0.21), 6 months was 0.87 mm (SD 0.22) and for 12 months was 0.89 mm (SD 0.23). The values of the Pearson's coefficients showed that the data measurement were positively correlated. The Anova test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion: The statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss can be considered physiological. Within the limits of this study it can be concluded that TMT implants have an excellent bone crest's stability, however, to have most accurate information, will be necessary extend the sample.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单钽牙种植体的临床和放射学评价:一项前瞻性临床试验研究。
目的:本前瞻性临床病例系列报告的目的是通过临床和影像学分析,评估钽牙种植体(Zimmer TMT, Parsippany, NJ, USA)假肢康复一年后种植体周围骨吸收情况。方法:对20例患者在上颌和下颌骨放置20颗钽种植体。患者被要求参加x光摄影和临床随访,并评估他们以前的临床记录和x光片。骨水平通过数字测量从植入体肩关节到第一根骨到植入体的距离,在手术中和功能恢复6个月和12个月后的根尖周x线片上进行计算。采用Pearson相关分析评估边缘骨质流失(MBL)测量之间是否存在相关性。采用方差分析和事后分析,采用Bonferroni检验对三组(0、6个月和12个月)进行比较。结果:0个月组平均总MBL为0.84 mm (SD 0.21), 6个月组为0.87 mm (SD 0.22), 12个月组为0.89 mm (SD 0.23)。Pearson’s系数的值表明数据测量呈正相关。方差分析显示组间差异有统计学意义。结论:边缘骨质流失的差异有统计学意义,可认为是生理性的。在本研究的范围内,可以得出结论,TMT种植体具有优异的骨嵴稳定性,然而,要获得最准确的信息,将需要扩展样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of colonization of legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines. Clinical protocol with digital cad/cam chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely worn dentition patients. Correlations between dental malocclusions, ocular motility, and convergence disorders: a cross-sectional study in growing subjects. Obstructive site localization in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: a comparison between otolaryngologic data and cephalometric values. Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1