Early detection of dementia in people with an intellectual disability - A German pilot study.

Bettina Kuske, Christian Wolff, Uwe Gövert, Sandra Verena Müller
{"title":"Early detection of dementia in people with an intellectual disability - A German pilot study.","authors":"Bettina Kuske,&nbsp;Christian Wolff,&nbsp;Uwe Gövert,&nbsp;Sandra Verena Müller","doi":"10.1111/jar.12347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the application of a newly developed neuropsychological assessment, the Wolfenbütteler Dementia Test for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (WDTIM) in combination with the Dementia Screening Questionnaire for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (DSQIID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The instruments were evaluated in a prospective 2-year follow-up study. A total of 102 people with an intellectual disability were assessed at 6-month intervals. Data were analysed using qualitative and statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four groups of individuals emerged from the analysis: (1) confirmed suspicion, (2) no suspicion, (3) questionable suspicion and (4) early suspicion. Significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2. The WDTIM could be administered to 90%-100% of all participants exhibiting mild-to-moderate intellectual disability and to 50% with severe intellectual disability .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WDTIM was shown to have good applicability to people with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability and to be appropriate for detecting cognitive changes. Using the two instruments in combination achieved greater accuracy in reinforcing a dementia suspicion than did using the DSQIID alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"30 Suppl 1 ","pages":"49-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12347","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the application of a newly developed neuropsychological assessment, the Wolfenbütteler Dementia Test for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (WDTIM) in combination with the Dementia Screening Questionnaire for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (DSQIID).

Methods: The instruments were evaluated in a prospective 2-year follow-up study. A total of 102 people with an intellectual disability were assessed at 6-month intervals. Data were analysed using qualitative and statistical analyses.

Results: Four groups of individuals emerged from the analysis: (1) confirmed suspicion, (2) no suspicion, (3) questionable suspicion and (4) early suspicion. Significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2. The WDTIM could be administered to 90%-100% of all participants exhibiting mild-to-moderate intellectual disability and to 50% with severe intellectual disability .

Conclusions: The WDTIM was shown to have good applicability to people with mild-to-moderate intellectual disability and to be appropriate for detecting cognitive changes. Using the two instruments in combination achieved greater accuracy in reinforcing a dementia suspicion than did using the DSQIID alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障患者痴呆的早期检测——一项德国试点研究。
背景:本研究探讨了一种新开发的神经心理学评估方法——wolfenb teteler痴呆测试(WDTIM)与智障个体痴呆筛查问卷(DSQIID)的应用。方法:在一项前瞻性2年随访研究中对这些器械进行评估。共有102名智障人士每隔6个月接受一次评估。数据分析采用定性和统计分析。结果:从分析中得出四组个体:(1)确认怀疑,(2)无怀疑,(3)可疑怀疑,(4)早期怀疑。第1组和第2组之间存在显著差异。WDTIM适用于90% ~ 100%的轻至中度智力残疾和50%的重度智力残疾患者。结论:WDTIM对轻至中度智力残疾患者具有良好的适用性,适用于检测认知变化。与单独使用DSQIID相比,结合使用这两种工具在加强痴呆症怀疑方面取得了更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Burnout Among Staff Working in Services for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Outcomes of a Creative Ability-Based Intervention: Advancing Independence in Learners With Severe Intellectual Disability. Childhood and Adulthood Predictors of Community Participation by Autistic Adults With and Without Intellectual Disability. Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Video-blogs and linguistic simplification for students with intellectual disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1