The effectiveness of Kinesio Taping on pain and disability in cervical myofascial pain syndrome

Saime Ay , Hatice Ecem Konak , Deniz Evcik , Sibel Kibar
{"title":"The effectiveness of Kinesio Taping on pain and disability in cervical myofascial pain syndrome","authors":"Saime Ay ,&nbsp;Hatice Ecem Konak ,&nbsp;Deniz Evcik ,&nbsp;Sibel Kibar","doi":"10.1016/j.rbre.2016.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping and sham Kinesio Taping on pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion, and disability in cervical myofascial pain syndrome patients (MPS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was designed as a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. Sixty-one patients with MPS were randomly assigned into two groups. Group 1 (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->31) was treated with Kinesio Taping and group 2 (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->30) was treated sham taping five times by intervals of 3 days for 15 days. Additionally, all patients were given neck exercise program. Patients were evaluated according to pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion and disability. Pain was assessed by using Visual Analog Scale, pressure pain threshold was measured by using an algometer, and active cervical range of motion was measured by using goniometry. Disability was assessed with the neck pain disability index disability. Measurements were taken before and after the treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the end of the therapy, there were statistically significant improvements on pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion, and disability (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) in both groups. Also there was a statistical difference between the groups regarding pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical flexion-extension (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05); except cervical rotation, cervical lateral flexion and disability (<em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that Kinesio Taping leads to improvements on pain, pressure pain threshold and cervical range of motion, but not disability in short time. Therefore, Kinesio Taping can be used as an alternative therapy method in the treatment of patients with MPS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)","volume":"57 2","pages":"Pages 93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbre.2016.03.012","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255502116300062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping and sham Kinesio Taping on pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion, and disability in cervical myofascial pain syndrome patients (MPS).

Methods

This study was designed as a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. Sixty-one patients with MPS were randomly assigned into two groups. Group 1 (n = 31) was treated with Kinesio Taping and group 2 (n = 30) was treated sham taping five times by intervals of 3 days for 15 days. Additionally, all patients were given neck exercise program. Patients were evaluated according to pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion and disability. Pain was assessed by using Visual Analog Scale, pressure pain threshold was measured by using an algometer, and active cervical range of motion was measured by using goniometry. Disability was assessed with the neck pain disability index disability. Measurements were taken before and after the treatment.

Results

At the end of the therapy, there were statistically significant improvements on pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion, and disability (p < 0.05) in both groups. Also there was a statistical difference between the groups regarding pain, pressure pain threshold, cervical flexion-extension (p < 0.05); except cervical rotation, cervical lateral flexion and disability (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study shows that Kinesio Taping leads to improvements on pain, pressure pain threshold and cervical range of motion, but not disability in short time. Therefore, Kinesio Taping can be used as an alternative therapy method in the treatment of patients with MPS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌内效贴贴治疗颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效观察
目的探讨肌内效贴敷和假肌内效贴敷对颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)患者疼痛、压痛阈、颈椎活动度和残疾的影响。方法采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。61例MPS患者随机分为两组。组1 (n = 31)采用肌内效贴敷治疗,组2 (n = 30)采用假贴敷5次,间隔3 d,连续15 d。此外,所有患者均给予颈部运动计划。根据疼痛、压痛阈、颈椎活动度和残疾程度对患者进行评估。用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,用疼痛计测量压痛阈值,用角度测量法测量颈椎活动度。用颈部疼痛残疾指数评估残疾程度。治疗前后分别进行测量。结果治疗结束时,疼痛、压痛阈、颈椎活动度和残疾均有统计学意义的改善(p <0.05)。两组在疼痛、压痛阈值、颈椎屈伸方面也有统计学差异(p <0.05);除了颈椎旋转,颈椎侧屈和残疾(p >0.05)。结论肌内效贴敷可以改善疼痛、压痛阈和颈椎活动度,但不能在短时间内造成残疾。因此,肌内效贴敷可以作为治疗MPS患者的一种替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in patients in Brazilian central-western region Interventional rheumatology: the competence of Brazilian rheumatologists Investigation of MEFV gene polymorphisms (G138G and A165A) in adult patients with familial Mediterranean fever Development of rheumatology training in Brazil: the option for a medical residency program Use of pamidronate for osteoporosis treatment in public health care in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1