Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY International Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-03-09 DOI:10.1155/2017/8417249
Evelien Bergrath, Robert A Gerber, David Gruben, Tatjana Lukic, Charles Makin, Gene Wallenstein
{"title":"Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Evelien Bergrath,&nbsp;Robert A Gerber,&nbsp;David Gruben,&nbsp;Tatjana Lukic,&nbsp;Charles Makin,&nbsp;Gene Wallenstein","doi":"10.1155/2017/8417249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as monotherapy and combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) versus biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and other novel DMARDs for second-line moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by means of a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA). <i>Methods</i>. MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and March 2015. Efficacy data based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at 6 months, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were analyzed by means of Bayesian NMAs. <i>Results</i>. 45 RCTs were identified, the majority of which demonstrated a low risk of bias. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) and 10 mg BID monotherapy exhibited comparable efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events versus other monotherapies. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID + DMARDs or methotrexate (MTX) were mostly comparable to other combination therapies in terms of efficacy and discontinuation due to adverse events. <i>Conclusion</i>. In most cases, tofacitinib had similar efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared to biologic DMARDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/8417249","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8417249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Objective. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as monotherapy and combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) versus biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and other novel DMARDs for second-line moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by means of a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods. MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and March 2015. Efficacy data based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at 6 months, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were analyzed by means of Bayesian NMAs. Results. 45 RCTs were identified, the majority of which demonstrated a low risk of bias. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) and 10 mg BID monotherapy exhibited comparable efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events versus other monotherapies. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID + DMARDs or methotrexate (MTX) were mostly comparable to other combination therapies in terms of efficacy and discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusion. In most cases, tofacitinib had similar efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared to biologic DMARDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托法替尼与生物治疗对非生物DMARDs反应不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者:系统文献综述和网络荟萃分析
目标。通过系统文献综述(SLR)和网络荟萃分析(NMA),比较tofacitinib(一种口服Janus激酶抑制剂,用于治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA),作为单一疗法并联合改善疾病的抗风湿药物(DMARDs)与生物DMARDs (bDMARDs)和其他新型DMARDs对二线中重度类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和耐受性。方法。检索MEDLINE®、EMBASE®和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,以确定1990年至2015年3月间发表的随机临床试验(rct)。基于美国风湿病学会(ACR)反应标准的疗效数据、6个月时健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)的改善情况以及不良事件导致的停药率采用贝叶斯NMAs分析。结果:共纳入45项随机对照试验,其中大多数显示偏倚风险较低。与其他单药治疗相比,托法替尼5mg每日两次(BID)和10mg BID单药治疗的疗效和因不良事件引起的停药率相当。托法替尼5mg BID和10mg BID + DMARDs或甲氨蝶呤(MTX)在疗效和因不良事件而停药方面与其他联合疗法相当。结论。在大多数情况下,与生物DMARDs相比,托法替尼具有相似的疗效和因不良事件引起的停药率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Psychiatric Manifestations of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome: A Narrative Review Association of Baseline Serum Soluble Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor Levels with the Response of Rheumatoid Arthritis to Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy. Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) and ITP Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Modalities Association of Cytokine IL-17, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-12 Gene Polymorphisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain, Fatigue, and Health Quality of Life of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1