The coefficient of friction in Parkinson's disease gait.

Q2 Medicine Functional neurology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.11138/fneur/2017.32.1.017
Ana Kleiner, M Galli, M Franceschini, M F De Pandis, F Stocchi, G Albertini, Ricardo Machado Leite de Barros
{"title":"The coefficient of friction in Parkinson's disease gait.","authors":"Ana Kleiner, M Galli, M Franceschini, M F De Pandis, F Stocchi, G Albertini, Ricardo Machado Leite de Barros","doi":"10.11138/fneur/2017.32.1.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to characterize the coefficient of friction (COF) curves of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) during barefoot gait and to evaluate the relationships between this variable and functional scales. Twenty-two subjects with PD (ON phase of levodopa) and 22 healthy subjects participated in this study. The participants walked barefoot along a pathway that went over two force plates embedded in the floor of the data collection room. The instantaneous COF was calculated as the ratio between the horizontal and vertical components of the ground reaction forces. Two-sample t-tests applied to every 1% of the support phase of the COF curve were used to compare the groups and to identify the phases in which the two groups were different. Specifically, three COF areas were computed: Area 1 (for the loading response phase), Area 2 (for the midstance phase) and Area 3 (for the terminal stance phase). Pearson's tests were applied to assess the associations between the COF curve areas and the clinical scales. The subjects with PD exhibited lower COF values during the loading response and terminal stance phases and higher COF values during the mid-stance phase compared with the control group. A strong positive correlation was observed between Area 1 and the Timed Up and Go Test (90.3%). In conclusion, the patients' COFs exhibited patterns that were different from those of the control group. Moreover, during the loading response phase, these differences were well-correlated with the Timed Up and Go Test scale data; Timed Up and Go Test data can be used to identify the risk of falls among PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12560,"journal":{"name":"Functional neurology","volume":"32 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505525/pdf/17-22.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/fneur/2017.32.1.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the coefficient of friction (COF) curves of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) during barefoot gait and to evaluate the relationships between this variable and functional scales. Twenty-two subjects with PD (ON phase of levodopa) and 22 healthy subjects participated in this study. The participants walked barefoot along a pathway that went over two force plates embedded in the floor of the data collection room. The instantaneous COF was calculated as the ratio between the horizontal and vertical components of the ground reaction forces. Two-sample t-tests applied to every 1% of the support phase of the COF curve were used to compare the groups and to identify the phases in which the two groups were different. Specifically, three COF areas were computed: Area 1 (for the loading response phase), Area 2 (for the midstance phase) and Area 3 (for the terminal stance phase). Pearson's tests were applied to assess the associations between the COF curve areas and the clinical scales. The subjects with PD exhibited lower COF values during the loading response and terminal stance phases and higher COF values during the mid-stance phase compared with the control group. A strong positive correlation was observed between Area 1 and the Timed Up and Go Test (90.3%). In conclusion, the patients' COFs exhibited patterns that were different from those of the control group. Moreover, during the loading response phase, these differences were well-correlated with the Timed Up and Go Test scale data; Timed Up and Go Test data can be used to identify the risk of falls among PD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病步态的摩擦系数。
本研究旨在描述帕金森病(PD)患者赤足步态时摩擦系数(COF)曲线的特征,并评估该变量与功能量表之间的关系。22 名帕金森病患者(左旋多巴的开启阶段)和 22 名健康人参加了这项研究。受试者赤脚沿着一条路径行走,该路径经过嵌在数据采集室地板上的两块力板。瞬时 COF 根据地面反作用力的水平分量和垂直分量之间的比率计算。对 COF 曲线支撑阶段的每 1%进行双样本 t 检验,以比较各组情况,并确定两组在哪些阶段存在差异。具体而言,计算了三个 COF 区域:区域 1(加载反应阶段)、区域 2(中段站立阶段)和区域 3(末段站立阶段)。皮尔逊检验用于评估 COF 曲线区域与临床量表之间的关联。与对照组相比,患有帕金森氏症的受试者在加载反应和末期站立阶段的 COF 值较低,而在中段站立阶段的 COF 值较高。在区域 1 和定时上下测试(90.3%)之间观察到了很强的正相关性。总之,患者的 COF 显示出与对照组不同的模式。此外,在负荷反应阶段,这些差异与定时上下楼测试量表数据有很好的相关性;定时上下楼测试数据可用于识别帕金森病患者的跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Functional neurology
Functional neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Barthel Index in patients with Parkinson's disease: a reliability and validity study. Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on upper limb activity according to a bi-dimensional kinematic analysis in progressive multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized single-blind pilot study. Does a single bout of exercise impacts BDNF, oxidative stress and epigenetic markers in spinal cord injury patients? Acute ischemic stroke management in Lebanon: obstacles and solutions. Neurophysiological changes after cognitive-motor tasks in Parkinson's disease patients with deep brain stimulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1