Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Cases Meeting Guidelines Among Patients in a University Hospital Setting.

Abstract

Background: A diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock has been shown to significantly increase mortality rate independent of other factors. Research has revealed all cause hospital case fatality rates have declined yet the percentage of severe sepsis cases continues to increase and age-adjusted mortality rates from severe sepsis and septic shock has significantly increased during the same time period. Patients with severe sepsis demonstrate ongoing mortality rate increases for up to 2 years following hospitalization when compared to aged matched controls of nonseptic patients. International guidelines with mortality benefit for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock have been illustrated in the latest surviving sepsis campaign.

Objective: The objective of this study was to increase the percentage of patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who met guidelines based on surviving sepsis campaign.

Methodology: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients admitted to UHC from January 2016 to present to identify cases with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, and whether they met guidelines set forth by surviving sepsis campaign both before and after an intervention program which included interviews with providers failing to meet protocol, educational sessions on guidelines to meet protocol, resident led quality improvement workshops to address barriers to meeting protocol, and development of an EMR power plan to assist providers on meeting protocol.

Results: 139 cases with a diagnosis, or meeting criteria for, severe sepsis or septic shock were identified during the period of 1/1/2016-9/30/2016 with an average of 43 percent of total cases which met guidelines. Trend analysis revealed increased compliance following resident lead intervention program with 31 percent and 49 percent before and after intervention, respectively. ICU data is currently being analyzed for meeting guidelines and have not been included in current data. The most common reason for failing guidelines was failure to obtain or repeat lactic acid on time (46 percent ); and failure to give timely antibiotics (22 percent );.

Conclusions: The percentage of patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock at UHC meeting guidelines set forth by surviving sepsis campaign has improved following resident lead intervention program. Intervention strategies to further improve compliance with guidelines with a goal >60 percent are currently being analyzed.