Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic?

Q2 Medicine BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Pub Date : 2017-04-21 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9
Richard Teck Kee Siau, Jay Goswamy, Sue Jones, Sadie Khwaja
{"title":"Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic?","authors":"Richard Teck Kee Siau,&nbsp;Jay Goswamy,&nbsp;Sue Jones,&nbsp;Sadie Khwaja","doi":"10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective acoustic analysis is a key component of multidimensional voice assessment. OperaVOX is an iOS app which has been shown to be comparable to Multi Dimensional Voice Program for most principal measures of vocal function. As a relatively cheap, portable and easily accessible form of acoustic analysis, OperaVOX may be more clinically useful than laboratory-based software in many situations. This study aims to determine whether correlation exists between acoustic measurements obtained using OperaVOX, and perceptual evaluation of voice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four voices from the multidisciplinary voice clinic were examined. Each voice was assessed blindly by a single experienced voice therapist using the GRBAS scale, and analysed using OperaVOX. The Spearman rank correlation co-efficient was calculated between each element of the GRBAS scale and acoustic measurements obtained by OperaVOX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations were identified between GRBAS scores and OperaVOX parameters. Grade correlated significantly with jitter (<i>ρ</i> = 0.495, <i>p</i> < 0.05), shimmer (<i>ρ</i> = 0.385, <i>p</i> < 0.05), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR; <i>ρ</i> = 0.526, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and maximum phonation time (MPT; <i>ρ</i> = -0.415, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Roughness did not correlate with any of the measured variables. Breathiness correlated significantly with jitter (<i>ρ</i> = 0.342, <i>p</i> < 0.05), NHR (<i>ρ</i> = 0.344, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and MPT (<i>ρ</i> = -0.336, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Aesthenia correlated with NHR (<i>ρ</i> = 0.413, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and MPT (<i>ρ</i> = -0.399, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Strain correlated with Jitter (<i>ρ</i> = 0.560, <i>p</i> < 0.05), NHR (<i>ρ</i> = 0.600, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and MPT (<i>ρ</i> = -0.356, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OperaVOX provides objective acoustic analysis which has shown statistically significant correlation to perceptual evaluation using the GRBAS scale. The accessibility of the software package makes it possible for a wide range of health practitioners, e.g. general ENT surgeons, vascular surgeons, thyroid surgeons and cardiothoracic surgeons to objectively monitor outcomes and complications of surgical procedures that may affect vocal function. Given the increasing requirement for surgeons to monitor their outcomes as part of the move towards 'surgeon reported outcomes' this may become an invaluable tool towards that goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Objective acoustic analysis is a key component of multidimensional voice assessment. OperaVOX is an iOS app which has been shown to be comparable to Multi Dimensional Voice Program for most principal measures of vocal function. As a relatively cheap, portable and easily accessible form of acoustic analysis, OperaVOX may be more clinically useful than laboratory-based software in many situations. This study aims to determine whether correlation exists between acoustic measurements obtained using OperaVOX, and perceptual evaluation of voice.

Methods: Forty-four voices from the multidisciplinary voice clinic were examined. Each voice was assessed blindly by a single experienced voice therapist using the GRBAS scale, and analysed using OperaVOX. The Spearman rank correlation co-efficient was calculated between each element of the GRBAS scale and acoustic measurements obtained by OperaVOX.

Results: Significant correlations were identified between GRBAS scores and OperaVOX parameters. Grade correlated significantly with jitter (ρ = 0.495, p < 0.05), shimmer (ρ = 0.385, p < 0.05), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR; ρ = 0.526, p < 0.05) and maximum phonation time (MPT; ρ = -0.415, p < 0.05). Roughness did not correlate with any of the measured variables. Breathiness correlated significantly with jitter (ρ = 0.342, p < 0.05), NHR (ρ = 0.344, p < 0.05) and MPT (ρ = -0.336, p < 0.05). Aesthenia correlated with NHR (ρ = 0.413, p < 0.05) and MPT (ρ = -0.399, p < 0.05). Strain correlated with Jitter (ρ = 0.560, p < 0.05), NHR (ρ = 0.600, p < 0.05) and MPT (ρ = -0.356, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: OperaVOX provides objective acoustic analysis which has shown statistically significant correlation to perceptual evaluation using the GRBAS scale. The accessibility of the software package makes it possible for a wide range of health practitioners, e.g. general ENT surgeons, vascular surgeons, thyroid surgeons and cardiothoracic surgeons to objectively monitor outcomes and complications of surgical procedures that may affect vocal function. Given the increasing requirement for surgeons to monitor their outcomes as part of the move towards 'surgeon reported outcomes' this may become an invaluable tool towards that goal.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在普通耳鼻喉科诊所,OperaVOX是评估声音的临床有用工具吗?
背景:客观声学分析是多维语音评价的重要组成部分。OperaVOX是一个iOS应用程序,已被证明可以与多维语音程序相媲美,用于大多数主要的声音功能测量。作为一种相对便宜、便携和易于获取的声学分析形式,在许多情况下,OperaVOX可能比基于实验室的软件在临床上更有用。本研究旨在确定使用OperaVOX获得的声学测量值与语音感知评估之间是否存在相关性。方法:对来自多学科语音门诊的44例语音进行分析。每个声音由一位经验丰富的语音治疗师使用GRBAS量表进行盲测,并使用OperaVOX进行分析。计算GRBAS尺度各元素与OperaVOX获得的声学测量值之间的Spearman秩相关系数。结果:GRBAS评分与OperaVOX参数之间存在显著相关性。评分与抖动显著相关(ρ = 0.495, p ρ = 0.385, p ρ = 0.526, p ρ = -0.415, p ρ = 0.342, p ρ = 0.344, p ρ = -0.336, p ρ = 0.413, p ρ = -0.399, p ρ = 0.560, p ρ = 0.600, p ρ = -0.356, p)结论:OperaVOX提供了客观的声学分析,与GRBAS量表的感知评价有统计学意义。软件包的可访问性使得广泛的健康从业者,例如普通耳鼻喉外科医生,血管外科医生,甲状腺外科医生和心胸外科医生能够客观地监测可能影响声带功能的外科手术的结果和并发症。鉴于越来越多的要求外科医生监测他们的结果,作为“外科医生报告结果”的一部分,这可能成为实现这一目标的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Cochlear implantation as a treatment for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a randomized controlled evaluation of cost-utility. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from patients with ear discharge in Jimma Town, Southwest, Ethiopia. Staphylococcus aureus from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis show minimal genetic association between polyp and non-polyp phenotypes. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a population-based survival analysis. Odontogenic necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1