Evaluating Model-Data Fit by Comparing Parametric and Nonparametric Item Response Functions: Application of a Tukey-Hann Procedure.

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Jeremy Kyle Jennings, George Engelhard
{"title":"Evaluating Model-Data Fit by Comparing Parametric and Nonparametric Item Response Functions: Application of a Tukey-Hann Procedure.","authors":"Jeremy Kyle Jennings,&nbsp;George Engelhard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes an approach for examining model-data fit for the dichotomous Rasch model using Tukey-Hann item response functions (TH-IRFs). The procedure proposed in this paper is based on an iterative version of a smoothing technique proposed by Tukey (1977) for estimating nonparametric item response functions (IRFs). A root integrated squared error (RISE) statistic (Douglas and Cohen, 2001) is used to compare the TH-IRFs to the Rasch IRFs. Data from undergraduate students at a large university are used to demonstrate this iterative smoothing technique. The RISE statistic is used for comparing the item response functions to assess model-data fit. A comparison between the residual based Infit and Outfit statistics and RISE statistics are also examined. The results suggest that the RISE statistic and TH-IRFs provide a useful analytical and graphical approach for evaluating item fit. Implications for research, theory and practice related to model-data fit are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"18 1","pages":"54-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes an approach for examining model-data fit for the dichotomous Rasch model using Tukey-Hann item response functions (TH-IRFs). The procedure proposed in this paper is based on an iterative version of a smoothing technique proposed by Tukey (1977) for estimating nonparametric item response functions (IRFs). A root integrated squared error (RISE) statistic (Douglas and Cohen, 2001) is used to compare the TH-IRFs to the Rasch IRFs. Data from undergraduate students at a large university are used to demonstrate this iterative smoothing technique. The RISE statistic is used for comparing the item response functions to assess model-data fit. A comparison between the residual based Infit and Outfit statistics and RISE statistics are also examined. The results suggest that the RISE statistic and TH-IRFs provide a useful analytical and graphical approach for evaluating item fit. Implications for research, theory and practice related to model-data fit are discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过比较参数和非参数项目响应函数来评估模型-数据拟合:Tukey-Hann程序的应用。
本研究描述了一种使用Tukey-Hann项目响应函数(th - irf)检查二分类Rasch模型模型数据拟合的方法。本文提出的程序是基于Tukey(1977)提出的用于估计非参数项目响应函数(irf)的平滑技术的迭代版本。根积分平方误差(RISE)统计(Douglas and Cohen, 2001)用于比较TH-IRFs和Rasch IRFs。本文使用了一所大型大学本科生的数据来演示这种迭代平滑技术。RISE统计量用于比较项目响应函数以评估模型-数据拟合。基于残差的Infit和Outfit统计与RISE统计之间的比较也进行了检查。结果表明,RISE统计和th - irf为评价项目拟合提供了一种有用的分析和图解方法。讨论了模型-数据拟合对研究、理论和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Egalitarian Education Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model. Bootstrap Estimate of Bias for Intraclass Correlation. Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth. Psychometric Properties of the General Movement Optimality Score using Rasch Measurement. Rasch Analysis of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale: Evidence for the Abbreviated Version.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1