Estimating Effects with Rare Outcomes and High Dimensional Covariates: Knowledge is Power.

Q3 Mathematics Epidemiologic Methods Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2016-05-24 DOI:10.1515/em-2014-0020
Laura Balzer, Jennifer Ahern, Sandro Galea, Mark van der Laan
{"title":"Estimating Effects with Rare Outcomes and High Dimensional Covariates: Knowledge is Power.","authors":"Laura Balzer, Jennifer Ahern, Sandro Galea, Mark van der Laan","doi":"10.1515/em-2014-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many of the secondary outcomes in observational studies and randomized trials are rare. Methods for estimating causal effects and associations with rare outcomes, however, are limited, and this represents a missed opportunity for investigation. In this article, we construct a new targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) for the effect or association of an exposure on a rare outcome. We focus on the causal risk difference and statistical models incorporating bounds on the conditional mean of the outcome, given the exposure and measured confounders. By construction, the proposed estimator constrains the predicted outcomes to respect this model knowledge. Theoretically, this bounding provides stability and power to estimate the exposure effect. In finite sample simulations, the proposed estimator performed as well, if not better, than alternative estimators, including a propensity score matching estimator, inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) estimator, augmented-IPTW and the standard TMLE algorithm. The new estimator yielded consistent estimates if either the conditional mean outcome or the propensity score was consistently estimated. As a substitution estimator, TMLE guaranteed the point estimates were within the parameter range. We applied the estimator to investigate the association between permissive neighborhood drunkenness norms and alcohol use disorder. Our results highlight the potential for double robust, semiparametric efficient estimation with rare events and high dimensional covariates.</p>","PeriodicalId":37999,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436729/pdf/nihms814448.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2014-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many of the secondary outcomes in observational studies and randomized trials are rare. Methods for estimating causal effects and associations with rare outcomes, however, are limited, and this represents a missed opportunity for investigation. In this article, we construct a new targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) for the effect or association of an exposure on a rare outcome. We focus on the causal risk difference and statistical models incorporating bounds on the conditional mean of the outcome, given the exposure and measured confounders. By construction, the proposed estimator constrains the predicted outcomes to respect this model knowledge. Theoretically, this bounding provides stability and power to estimate the exposure effect. In finite sample simulations, the proposed estimator performed as well, if not better, than alternative estimators, including a propensity score matching estimator, inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) estimator, augmented-IPTW and the standard TMLE algorithm. The new estimator yielded consistent estimates if either the conditional mean outcome or the propensity score was consistently estimated. As a substitution estimator, TMLE guaranteed the point estimates were within the parameter range. We applied the estimator to investigate the association between permissive neighborhood drunkenness norms and alcohol use disorder. Our results highlight the potential for double robust, semiparametric efficient estimation with rare events and high dimensional covariates.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用罕见结果和高维变量估算效应:知识就是力量
观察性研究和随机试验中的许多次要结果都很罕见。然而,估计罕见结果的因果效应和关联的方法却很有限,这就意味着错失了调查机会。在本文中,我们构建了一种新的基于最小损失的目标估算器(TMLE),用于估算暴露对罕见结果的影响或关联。我们将重点放在因果风险差异和统计模型上,在给定暴露和测量混杂因素的情况下,对结果的条件平均值进行约束。根据构造,所提出的估计器会限制预测结果以尊重这一模型知识。从理论上讲,这种约束提供了估计暴露效应的稳定性和能力。在有限样本模拟中,所提出的估计方法与其他估计方法(包括倾向评分匹配估计方法、反向治疗概率加权(IPTW)估计方法、增强型 IPTW 估计方法和标准 TMLE 算法)相比,表现不相上下,甚至更好。如果条件平均结果或倾向得分的估算结果一致,新估算器就能得出一致的估算结果。作为一种替代估计器,TMLE 保证了点估计值在参数范围内。我们应用该估计器调查了放任型邻里醉酒规范与酒精使用障碍之间的关联。我们的结果凸显了对罕见事件和高维协变量进行双重稳健、半参数高效估计的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Methods
Epidemiologic Methods Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Methods (EM) seeks contributions comparable to those of the leading epidemiologic journals, but also invites papers that may be more technical or of greater length than what has traditionally been allowed by journals in epidemiology. Applications and examples with real data to illustrate methodology are strongly encouraged but not required. Topics. genetic epidemiology, infectious disease, pharmaco-epidemiology, ecologic studies, environmental exposures, screening, surveillance, social networks, comparative effectiveness, statistical modeling, causal inference, measurement error, study design, meta-analysis
期刊最新文献
Linked shrinkage to improve estimation of interaction effects in regression models. Bounds for selection bias using outcome probabilities Population dynamic study of two prey one predator system with disease in first prey using fuzzy impulsive control Development and application of an evidence-based directed acyclic graph to evaluate the associations between metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes. Performance evaluation of ResNet model for classification of tomato plant disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1