Attitudes and interest in technology-based treatment and the remote monitoring of smoking among adolescents and emerging adults.

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2017-06-01 Epub Date: 2015-10-08 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2015.15
Erin McClure, Nathaniel Baker, Matthew J Carpenter, Frank A Treiber, Kevin Gray
{"title":"Attitudes and interest in technology-based treatment and the remote monitoring of smoking among adolescents and emerging adults.","authors":"Erin McClure,&nbsp;Nathaniel Baker,&nbsp;Matthew J Carpenter,&nbsp;Frank A Treiber,&nbsp;Kevin Gray","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2015.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the public health relevance of smoking in adolescents and emerging adults, this group remains understudied and underserved. High technology utilization among this group may be harnessed as a tool for better understanding of smoking, yet little is known regarding the acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (ages 14-21) enrolled in a smoking cessation clinical trial provided feedback on their technology utilization, perceptions, and attitudes; and interest in remote monitoring for smoking. Characteristics that predicted greater technology acceptability for smoking treatment were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N=87) averaged 19 years old and were mostly male (67%). Technology utilization was high for smart phone ownership (93%), Internet use (98%), and social media use (94%). Despite this, only one-third of participants had ever searched the Internet for cessation tips or counseling (33%). Participants showed interest in mHealth-enabled treatment (48%) and felt that it could be somewhat helpful (83%). Heavier smokers had more favorable attitudes toward technology-based treatment, as did those with smartphones and unlimited data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate high technology utilization, favorable attitudes towards technology, and minimal concerns. Technology integration among this population should be pursued, though in a tailored fashion, to accomplish the goal of providing maximally effective, just-in-time interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"12 2","pages":"88-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2015.15","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2015.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the public health relevance of smoking in adolescents and emerging adults, this group remains understudied and underserved. High technology utilization among this group may be harnessed as a tool for better understanding of smoking, yet little is known regarding the acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) integration.

Methods: Participants (ages 14-21) enrolled in a smoking cessation clinical trial provided feedback on their technology utilization, perceptions, and attitudes; and interest in remote monitoring for smoking. Characteristics that predicted greater technology acceptability for smoking treatment were also explored.

Results: Participants (N=87) averaged 19 years old and were mostly male (67%). Technology utilization was high for smart phone ownership (93%), Internet use (98%), and social media use (94%). Despite this, only one-third of participants had ever searched the Internet for cessation tips or counseling (33%). Participants showed interest in mHealth-enabled treatment (48%) and felt that it could be somewhat helpful (83%). Heavier smokers had more favorable attitudes toward technology-based treatment, as did those with smartphones and unlimited data.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate high technology utilization, favorable attitudes towards technology, and minimal concerns. Technology integration among this population should be pursued, though in a tailored fashion, to accomplish the goal of providing maximally effective, just-in-time interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年和初成人对基于技术的治疗和远程监测吸烟的态度和兴趣。
引言:尽管吸烟与青少年和初成人的公共卫生相关,但这一群体仍未得到充分的研究和服务。这一群体对高科技的利用可以作为更好地了解吸烟的一种工具,但对移动医疗(mHealth)一体化的可接受性知之甚少。方法:参加戒烟临床试验的参与者(14-21岁)提供了他们对技术使用、感知和态度的反馈;以及对吸烟远程监控的兴趣。还探讨了预测吸烟治疗技术可接受性更高的特征。结果:参与者87人,平均年龄19岁,以男性居多(67%)。智能手机拥有量(93%)、互联网使用(98%)和社交媒体使用(94%)的技术利用率较高。尽管如此,只有三分之一的参与者曾经在互联网上搜索戒烟提示或咨询(33%)。参与者表现出对移动医疗治疗的兴趣(48%),并认为它可能有所帮助(83%)。重度吸烟者对基于技术的治疗持更有利的态度,那些使用智能手机和无限数据的人也是如此。结论:我们的研究结果显示了高技术利用率,对技术的良好态度和最小的担忧。应该在这些人口中进行技术整合,尽管是以有针对性的方式,以实现提供最有效的及时干预措施的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1