Attitudes and interest in technology-based treatment and the remote monitoring of smoking among adolescents and emerging adults.

IF 1.2 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2017-06-01 Epub Date: 2015-10-08 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2015.15
Erin McClure, Nathaniel Baker, Matthew J Carpenter, Frank A Treiber, Kevin Gray
{"title":"Attitudes and interest in technology-based treatment and the remote monitoring of smoking among adolescents and emerging adults.","authors":"Erin McClure,&nbsp;Nathaniel Baker,&nbsp;Matthew J Carpenter,&nbsp;Frank A Treiber,&nbsp;Kevin Gray","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2015.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the public health relevance of smoking in adolescents and emerging adults, this group remains understudied and underserved. High technology utilization among this group may be harnessed as a tool for better understanding of smoking, yet little is known regarding the acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (ages 14-21) enrolled in a smoking cessation clinical trial provided feedback on their technology utilization, perceptions, and attitudes; and interest in remote monitoring for smoking. Characteristics that predicted greater technology acceptability for smoking treatment were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N=87) averaged 19 years old and were mostly male (67%). Technology utilization was high for smart phone ownership (93%), Internet use (98%), and social media use (94%). Despite this, only one-third of participants had ever searched the Internet for cessation tips or counseling (33%). Participants showed interest in mHealth-enabled treatment (48%) and felt that it could be somewhat helpful (83%). Heavier smokers had more favorable attitudes toward technology-based treatment, as did those with smartphones and unlimited data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate high technology utilization, favorable attitudes towards technology, and minimal concerns. Technology integration among this population should be pursued, though in a tailored fashion, to accomplish the goal of providing maximally effective, just-in-time interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"12 2","pages":"88-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2015.15","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2015.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the public health relevance of smoking in adolescents and emerging adults, this group remains understudied and underserved. High technology utilization among this group may be harnessed as a tool for better understanding of smoking, yet little is known regarding the acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) integration.

Methods: Participants (ages 14-21) enrolled in a smoking cessation clinical trial provided feedback on their technology utilization, perceptions, and attitudes; and interest in remote monitoring for smoking. Characteristics that predicted greater technology acceptability for smoking treatment were also explored.

Results: Participants (N=87) averaged 19 years old and were mostly male (67%). Technology utilization was high for smart phone ownership (93%), Internet use (98%), and social media use (94%). Despite this, only one-third of participants had ever searched the Internet for cessation tips or counseling (33%). Participants showed interest in mHealth-enabled treatment (48%) and felt that it could be somewhat helpful (83%). Heavier smokers had more favorable attitudes toward technology-based treatment, as did those with smartphones and unlimited data.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate high technology utilization, favorable attitudes towards technology, and minimal concerns. Technology integration among this population should be pursued, though in a tailored fashion, to accomplish the goal of providing maximally effective, just-in-time interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年和初成人对基于技术的治疗和远程监测吸烟的态度和兴趣。
引言:尽管吸烟与青少年和初成人的公共卫生相关,但这一群体仍未得到充分的研究和服务。这一群体对高科技的利用可以作为更好地了解吸烟的一种工具,但对移动医疗(mHealth)一体化的可接受性知之甚少。方法:参加戒烟临床试验的参与者(14-21岁)提供了他们对技术使用、感知和态度的反馈;以及对吸烟远程监控的兴趣。还探讨了预测吸烟治疗技术可接受性更高的特征。结果:参与者87人,平均年龄19岁,以男性居多(67%)。智能手机拥有量(93%)、互联网使用(98%)和社交媒体使用(94%)的技术利用率较高。尽管如此,只有三分之一的参与者曾经在互联网上搜索戒烟提示或咨询(33%)。参与者表现出对移动医疗治疗的兴趣(48%),并认为它可能有所帮助(83%)。重度吸烟者对基于技术的治疗持更有利的态度,那些使用智能手机和无限数据的人也是如此。结论:我们的研究结果显示了高技术利用率,对技术的良好态度和最小的担忧。应该在这些人口中进行技术整合,尽管是以有针对性的方式,以实现提供最有效的及时干预措施的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. Integrating the "Quit and Stay Quit Monday" Model into Smoking Cessation Services for Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1