Risk factors of perioperative complications in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: A ten-year experience.

Xiao-Jun Liu, Liang Liu, Kun Chang, Ding-Wei Ye, Yong-Fa Zheng, Xu-Dong Yao
{"title":"Risk factors of perioperative complications in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: A ten-year experience.","authors":"Xiao-Jun Liu,&nbsp;Liang Liu,&nbsp;Kun Chang,&nbsp;Ding-Wei Ye,&nbsp;Yong-Fa Zheng,&nbsp;Xu-Dong Yao","doi":"10.1007/s11596-017-1743-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has been one of the most effective treatments for prostate cancer. This study is designed to identify the related predictive risk factors for complications in patients following RRP. Between 2000 and 2012 in Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 421 cases undergoing RRP for localized prostate cancer by one surgeon were included in this retrospective analysis. We reviewed various risk factors that were correlated with perioperative complications, including patient characteristics [age, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities], clinical findings (preoperative PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, pathological grade), and surgeon's own clinical practice. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was used to explain comorbidities. The total rate of perioperative complications was 23.2% (98/421). There were 45/421 (10.7%), 28/421 (6.6%), 24/421 (5.7%) and 1/421 (0.2%) in grade I, II, III, IV respectively, and 323/421 (76.8%) cases had none of these complications. Statistical analysis of multiple potential risk factors revealed that BMI >30 (P=0.014), Charlson score ≥1 (P<0.001) and surgical experience (P=0.0252) were predictors of perioperative complications. Age, PSA level, Gleason score, TNM stage, operation time, blood loss, and blood transfusion were not correlated with perioperative complications (P>0.05). It was concluded that patients' own factors and surgeons' technical factors are related with an increased risk of development of perioperative complications following radical prostatectomy. Knowing these predictors can both favor risk stratification of patients undergoing RRP and help surgeons make treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","volume":"37 3","pages":"379-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11596-017-1743-7","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1743-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has been one of the most effective treatments for prostate cancer. This study is designed to identify the related predictive risk factors for complications in patients following RRP. Between 2000 and 2012 in Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 421 cases undergoing RRP for localized prostate cancer by one surgeon were included in this retrospective analysis. We reviewed various risk factors that were correlated with perioperative complications, including patient characteristics [age, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities], clinical findings (preoperative PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, pathological grade), and surgeon's own clinical practice. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was used to explain comorbidities. The total rate of perioperative complications was 23.2% (98/421). There were 45/421 (10.7%), 28/421 (6.6%), 24/421 (5.7%) and 1/421 (0.2%) in grade I, II, III, IV respectively, and 323/421 (76.8%) cases had none of these complications. Statistical analysis of multiple potential risk factors revealed that BMI >30 (P=0.014), Charlson score ≥1 (P<0.001) and surgical experience (P=0.0252) were predictors of perioperative complications. Age, PSA level, Gleason score, TNM stage, operation time, blood loss, and blood transfusion were not correlated with perioperative complications (P>0.05). It was concluded that patients' own factors and surgeons' technical factors are related with an increased risk of development of perioperative complications following radical prostatectomy. Knowing these predictors can both favor risk stratification of patients undergoing RRP and help surgeons make treatment decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:一个十年的经验。
根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)是治疗前列腺癌最有效的方法之一。本研究旨在确定RRP患者并发症的相关预测危险因素。回顾性分析2000 - 2012年复旦大学上海肿瘤中心泌尿外科由一名外科医生行局限性前列腺癌RRP手术的421例患者。我们回顾了与围手术期并发症相关的各种危险因素,包括患者特征(年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症)、临床表现(术前PSA水平、Gleason评分、临床分期、病理分级)和外科医生自己的临床实践。Charlson共病指数(CCI)用于解释合并症。围手术期并发症发生率为23.2%(98/421)。I、II、III、IV级分别为45/421(10.7%)、28/421(6.6%)、24/421(5.7%)和1/421(0.2%),其中323/421(76.8%)例无上述并发症。多重潜在危险因素统计分析显示BMI >30 (P=0.014), Charlson评分≥1 (P0.05)。结论:根治性前列腺切除术围手术期并发症的发生与患者自身因素和外科医生技术因素有关。了解这些预测因素既有利于对接受RRP的患者进行风险分层,也有助于外科医生做出治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.08
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A modified surgical approach of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer: Report of two cases and literature review. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation: A single-center data analysis. Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring different types of EGFR mutations: A retrospective analysis. Look into hepatic progenitor cell associated trait: Histological heterogeneity of hepatitis B-related combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Knockdown of GRHL3 inhibits activities and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human colorectal cancer cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1