A mismatch between supply and demand of social support in dementia care: a qualitative study on the perspectives of spousal caregivers and their social network members.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2018-06-01 Epub Date: 2017-06-13 DOI:10.1017/S1041610217000898
Alieske E H Dam, Lizzy M M Boots, Martin P J van Boxtel, Frans R J Verhey, Marjolein E de Vugt
{"title":"A mismatch between supply and demand of social support in dementia care: a qualitative study on the perspectives of spousal caregivers and their social network members.","authors":"Alieske E H Dam, Lizzy M M Boots, Martin P J van Boxtel, Frans R J Verhey, Marjolein E de Vugt","doi":"10.1017/S1041610217000898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ABSTRACTBackground:Access to social support contributes to feelings of independence and better social health. This qualitative study aims to investigate multi-informant perspectives on informal social support in dementia care networks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten spousal caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) completed an ecogram, a social network card and a semi-structured interview. The ecogram aimed to trigger subjective experiences regarding social support. Subsequently, 17 network members were interviewed. The qualitative analyses identified codes, categories, and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixth themes emerged: (1) barriers to ask for support; (2) facilitators to ask for support; (3) barriers to offer support; (4) facilitators to offer support; (5) a mismatch between supply and demand of social support; and (6) openness in communication to repair the imbalance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Integrating social network perspectives resulted in a novel model identifying a mismatch between the supply and demand of social support, strengthened by a cognitive bias: caregivers reported to think for other social network members and vice versa. Openness in communication in formal and informal care systems might repair this mismatch.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":"30 6","pages":"881-892"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217000898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground:Access to social support contributes to feelings of independence and better social health. This qualitative study aims to investigate multi-informant perspectives on informal social support in dementia care networks.

Methods: Ten spousal caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) completed an ecogram, a social network card and a semi-structured interview. The ecogram aimed to trigger subjective experiences regarding social support. Subsequently, 17 network members were interviewed. The qualitative analyses identified codes, categories, and themes.

Results: Sixth themes emerged: (1) barriers to ask for support; (2) facilitators to ask for support; (3) barriers to offer support; (4) facilitators to offer support; (5) a mismatch between supply and demand of social support; and (6) openness in communication to repair the imbalance.

Discussion: Integrating social network perspectives resulted in a novel model identifying a mismatch between the supply and demand of social support, strengthened by a cognitive bias: caregivers reported to think for other social network members and vice versa. Openness in communication in formal and informal care systems might repair this mismatch.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失智症照护中社会支持的供需失配:配偶照护者及其社会网络成员视角的质性研究
摘要背景:获得社会支持有助于提高独立感和社会健康水平。本质性研究的目的是探讨在痴呆症护理网络非正式社会支持的多信息提供者的观点。方法:对10名老年痴呆患者的配偶照顾者进行ecograph、social network card和半结构化访谈。ecogram旨在激发关于社会支持的主观体验。随后,17名网络成员接受了采访。定性分析确定了代码、类别和主题。结果:第六个主题:(1)寻求支持的障碍;(2)引导者寻求支持;(3)提供支持的障碍;(4)辅导员提供支持;(5)社会支持供给与需求不匹配;(6)沟通开放,修复不平衡。讨论:整合社会网络视角产生了一个新的模型,该模型识别了社会支持供需之间的不匹配,并被认知偏见所加强:据报道,照顾者为其他社会网络成员思考,反之亦然。正式和非正式护理系统中交流的开放性可能会修复这种不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Expanding the boundaries of cognitive aging research: New insights into subjective cognitive decline and the oldest old. Cultural pathways to well-being in aging Japan: Exploring the meaning of "Good to Have Been Alive" through generativity, nature, and intergenerational connection. Hippocampal subfield volumes associated with depression symptoms in older dementia caregivers. A meta-review and synthesis of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for people living with dementia nearing the end of life and their family carers. Dementia training for healthcare professionals: A systematic policy and evidence review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1