New initiatives in housing for the mentally handicapped.

D Hawes
{"title":"New initiatives in housing for the mentally handicapped.","authors":"D Hawes","doi":"10.1177/146642408210200111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"erm institutional care, particularly in the older and arger institutions is not only costly, but is unable to espond readily to the individual needs and capabilities atients. Hostel and hospital living tends to mean the of contact between patients and their families, rt icularly when long travel distances are involved, nd loss of ability to maintain social contacts within the ommunity. The bigger an establishment becomes the ore isolated and inward looking it grows, tending to ecome self-contained rather than relating to the outide community. Rules made for the general good can e oppressive to the individual and it is easy for the ersonality to become ’institutionalised’. The idea that he mentally handicapped have the basic right to live in he community like anyone else, and perhaps even ore need to do so, reinforces the view that they have he same human value and human rights as any other, nd leads to the view that services provided for them ust recognise the essential individuality and specific needs of each patient. Discussion along these lines among professionals in various disciplines and among the parents and voluntary agencies who assist the mentally handicapped has received tacit support from many quarters, not least from the medical profession and from the specialist nursing services. The more practical argument that large scale institutions are essively costly, both in the capital resources needed rovide them, and in the per capita running costs is a persuasive element in discussions with regional health authorities and social service departments. Schemes such as those described below indicate about 42 per cent reduction in revenue cost compared with institutional care. The case for comprehensive, locally-based residential services for the mentally handicapped was given a further boost in March 1980 when a project paper by the Kings Fund Centre was published arguing the case most lucidly on grounds both of economy and of quality of service. At a more emotive level recent television news and documentary pieces have illustrated that it was possible in the past for people with the most mild inadequacies to be incarcerated in large mental institutions for decades, only to be discovered by some progressive consultant and launched into a perfectly adequate lifestyle in independent housing within the community.","PeriodicalId":76506,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society of Health journal","volume":" ","pages":"35-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/146642408210200111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society of Health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/146642408210200111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

erm institutional care, particularly in the older and arger institutions is not only costly, but is unable to espond readily to the individual needs and capabilities atients. Hostel and hospital living tends to mean the of contact between patients and their families, rt icularly when long travel distances are involved, nd loss of ability to maintain social contacts within the ommunity. The bigger an establishment becomes the ore isolated and inward looking it grows, tending to ecome self-contained rather than relating to the outide community. Rules made for the general good can e oppressive to the individual and it is easy for the ersonality to become ’institutionalised’. The idea that he mentally handicapped have the basic right to live in he community like anyone else, and perhaps even ore need to do so, reinforces the view that they have he same human value and human rights as any other, nd leads to the view that services provided for them ust recognise the essential individuality and specific needs of each patient. Discussion along these lines among professionals in various disciplines and among the parents and voluntary agencies who assist the mentally handicapped has received tacit support from many quarters, not least from the medical profession and from the specialist nursing services. The more practical argument that large scale institutions are essively costly, both in the capital resources needed rovide them, and in the per capita running costs is a persuasive element in discussions with regional health authorities and social service departments. Schemes such as those described below indicate about 42 per cent reduction in revenue cost compared with institutional care. The case for comprehensive, locally-based residential services for the mentally handicapped was given a further boost in March 1980 when a project paper by the Kings Fund Centre was published arguing the case most lucidly on grounds both of economy and of quality of service. At a more emotive level recent television news and documentary pieces have illustrated that it was possible in the past for people with the most mild inadequacies to be incarcerated in large mental institutions for decades, only to be discovered by some progressive consultant and launched into a perfectly adequate lifestyle in independent housing within the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为弱智人士提供住房的新措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental health. Noise control Nursery education. From home to the community. Teamwork within the primary health team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1