Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Central Finland Central Hospital in 2010-2015.

Aleksi Reito, Hanna-Liina Logren, Katri Ahonen, Heikki Nurmi, Juha Paloneva
{"title":"Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Central Finland Central Hospital in 2010-2015.","authors":"Aleksi Reito,&nbsp;Hanna-Liina Logren,&nbsp;Katri Ahonen,&nbsp;Heikki Nurmi,&nbsp;Juha Paloneva","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures and treatment strategies have undergone a major change in recent years. We investigated the incidence of acute Achilles tendon ruptures, the choice of treatment strategies and treatment implementation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The research material consisted of patients living in the catchment area of Central Finland Hospital District who had been diagnosed with an acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2010 and 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample consisted of 266 patients. Conservative treatment was started for 207 patients, and the remaining 59 were referred for surgery. During the study period, the proportion of patients undergoing surgery fell from 41% to 10%. Three patients (1.4%) were referred for surgery during conservative treatment, and 10 patients (4.7%) developed deep vein thrombosis while wearing a cast or an orthosis. Twelve patients (5.8%) sustained a re-rupture after conservative treatment. Two surgically-treated patients (3.5%) sustained a re-rupture, and one patient (1.7%) developed deep vein thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strategies for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures have clearly become more conservative in our hospital. Conservative treatment is safe and rarely fails. However, it is important to bear in mind that surgery still has a role in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.</p>","PeriodicalId":72850,"journal":{"name":"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures and treatment strategies have undergone a major change in recent years. We investigated the incidence of acute Achilles tendon ruptures, the choice of treatment strategies and treatment implementation.

Materials and methods: The research material consisted of patients living in the catchment area of Central Finland Hospital District who had been diagnosed with an acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2010 and 2015.

Results: The final sample consisted of 266 patients. Conservative treatment was started for 207 patients, and the remaining 59 were referred for surgery. During the study period, the proportion of patients undergoing surgery fell from 41% to 10%. Three patients (1.4%) were referred for surgery during conservative treatment, and 10 patients (4.7%) developed deep vein thrombosis while wearing a cast or an orthosis. Twelve patients (5.8%) sustained a re-rupture after conservative treatment. Two surgically-treated patients (3.5%) sustained a re-rupture, and one patient (1.7%) developed deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusions: The strategies for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures have clearly become more conservative in our hospital. Conservative treatment is safe and rarely fails. However, it is important to bear in mind that surgery still has a role in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010-2015年芬兰中部中心医院急性跟腱断裂的治疗
背景:近年来跟腱断裂的流行病学和治疗策略发生了重大变化。我们调查了急性跟腱断裂的发生率,治疗策略的选择和治疗的实施。材料和方法:研究材料包括2010年至2015年间居住在芬兰中部医院区集水区诊断为急性跟腱断裂的患者。结果:最终样本包括266例患者。207例患者开始保守治疗,其余59例转行手术治疗。在研究期间,接受手术的患者比例从41%下降到10%。3例患者(1.4%)在保守治疗期间转诊手术,10例患者(4.7%)在佩戴石膏或矫形器时发生深静脉血栓。保守治疗后再次破裂12例(5.8%)。2例手术治疗患者(3.5%)再次破裂,1例(1.7%)发生深静脉血栓形成。结论:我院急性跟腱断裂的治疗策略明显趋向保守。保守治疗是安全的,很少失败。然而,重要的是要记住,手术仍然在治疗急性跟腱断裂中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[AMMONIUM CHLORIDE POISONING]. [Ecological ethics]. [Alone]. [Personality disorders]. [Febrile seizures].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1