Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation.

Q2 Medicine BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Pub Date : 2017-11-28 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y
Geerte G J Ramakers, Yvette E Smulders, Alice van Zon, Gijsbert A Van Zanten, Wilko Grolman, Inge Stegeman
{"title":"Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation.","authors":"Geerte G J Ramakers,&nbsp;Yvette E Smulders,&nbsp;Alice van Zon,&nbsp;Gijsbert A Van Zanten,&nbsp;Wilko Grolman,&nbsp;Inge Stegeman","doi":"10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients' subjective experiences gain importance in today's healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (<i>n</i> = 19) or bilateral (<i>n</i> = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (<i>r</i> = -0.33 to -0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (<i>r</i> = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (<i>r</i> = -0.28 to -0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (<i>r</i> = 0.15 to -0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients' subjective experiences gain importance in today's healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients.

Methods: Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (n = 19) or bilateral (n = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users.

Results: We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (r = -0.33 to -0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (r = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (r = -0.28 to -0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (r = 0.15 to -0.40).

Conclusions: Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis.

Trial registration: This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧和双侧人工耳蜗植入后主客观听力测试的相关性
背景:评估人工耳蜗植入术后听力表现的方法很多。标准的评估通常只包括客观的听力测试,而患者的主观经验在今天的医疗保健中越来越重要。本研究的目的是分析成人人工耳蜗(CI)使用者的主观(自我报告问卷)和客观(言语感知和定位)听力测试结果之间的相关性。其次,比较双侧和单侧CI患者主观和客观听力测试的相关性。方法:本研究的数据是作为多中心随机对照试验的一部分前瞻性收集的。38例舌后聋成人患者随机分配接受单侧(n = 19)或双侧(n = 19)人工耳蜗植入。我们使用了一年随访后收集的数据。我们研究了客观测量的语音感知和定位技能与语音、空间和听力质量量表(SSQ)和奈梅亨人工耳蜗问卷(NCIQ)相关领域的相关性。我们还比较了单侧和双侧CI用户之间的相关性。结果:我们发现主观测试结果(SSQ的语音域和NCIQ的高级语音感知域)与噪声测试结果中相关的客观语音感知之间存在显著的弱至中度负相关(r = -0.33 ~ -0.48)。主观测试结果(SSQ的空间域)与客观定位测试结果之间存在显著的中度相关(r = 0.59)。双侧CI患者组的相关性(r = -0.28 ~ -0.54)与单侧CI患者组的相关性(r = 0.15 ~ -0.40)无显著差异。结论:目前的客观测试不能完全反映主观的日常听力情况。本研究阐明了问卷调查在人工耳蜗植入术评价中的重要性和必要性。因此,建议定期对CI患者的客观和主观检查进行评估。试验登记:本试验于2009年3月11日在荷兰试验登记中登记。试验注册号:NTR1722。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Cochlear implantation as a treatment for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a randomized controlled evaluation of cost-utility. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from patients with ear discharge in Jimma Town, Southwest, Ethiopia. Staphylococcus aureus from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis show minimal genetic association between polyp and non-polyp phenotypes. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a population-based survival analysis. Odontogenic necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1