Mentoring for INnovative Design Solutions (MINDS): Key Design Considerations and Collaborative Teamwork across Universities for Clinical Translation.

Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez, Walter Lee Murfee, Jeffrey A LaMack, Teresa A Murray
{"title":"Mentoring for INnovative Design Solutions (MINDS): Key Design Considerations and Collaborative Teamwork across Universities for Clinical Translation.","authors":"Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez, Walter Lee Murfee, Jeffrey A LaMack, Teresa A Murray","doi":"10.1007/s43683-022-00090-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main purpose of this paper is to share the Mentoring for INnovative Design Solutions (MINDS) Scholars Program developed by Alpha Eta Mu Beta, the International Biomedical Engineering Honor Society. The program's goals are to (1) introduce biomedical engineering students to an open-ended design experience as part of interuniversity teams with industry and faculty mentors, and (2) develop the ability to create designs considering clinical translatability on teams with different backgrounds and areas of expertise. MINDS uses an experiential learning approach to (1) enrich student curricular experiences through inter-institutional collaboration, (2) build engineering design skills, including three key design considerations for clinical/commercial success: intellectual property protection, regulatory strategy, and market identification; and (3) emphasize the importance of end-user considerations. From 2015 to 2022, MINDS has involved 131 students from 50 universities and 22 faculty and industry mentors. Pre- and post-program surveys show statistically significant improvements in understanding of the design process, regulatory strategy, intellectual property protection, market definition, and key product requirements and features. Students also improved communication and teamwork skills. Many students indicated that MINDS participation made them more likely to choose careers that involve product development and/or entrepreneurship. Students attained a working ability to integrate market needs, regulatory strategy, and intellectual property considerations into the design process. They also further developed soft skills, such as conflict resolution, time management, and effective communication through the challenges of inter-institutional collaboration. Additionally, the program heightened their awareness of how biomedical devices and technologies can benefit society.</p>","PeriodicalId":72385,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering education","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00090-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to share the Mentoring for INnovative Design Solutions (MINDS) Scholars Program developed by Alpha Eta Mu Beta, the International Biomedical Engineering Honor Society. The program's goals are to (1) introduce biomedical engineering students to an open-ended design experience as part of interuniversity teams with industry and faculty mentors, and (2) develop the ability to create designs considering clinical translatability on teams with different backgrounds and areas of expertise. MINDS uses an experiential learning approach to (1) enrich student curricular experiences through inter-institutional collaboration, (2) build engineering design skills, including three key design considerations for clinical/commercial success: intellectual property protection, regulatory strategy, and market identification; and (3) emphasize the importance of end-user considerations. From 2015 to 2022, MINDS has involved 131 students from 50 universities and 22 faculty and industry mentors. Pre- and post-program surveys show statistically significant improvements in understanding of the design process, regulatory strategy, intellectual property protection, market definition, and key product requirements and features. Students also improved communication and teamwork skills. Many students indicated that MINDS participation made them more likely to choose careers that involve product development and/or entrepreneurship. Students attained a working ability to integrate market needs, regulatory strategy, and intellectual property considerations into the design process. They also further developed soft skills, such as conflict resolution, time management, and effective communication through the challenges of inter-institutional collaboration. Additionally, the program heightened their awareness of how biomedical devices and technologies can benefit society.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新设计解决方案指导(MINDS):临床转化的关键设计考虑因素和跨大学合作团队。
本文的主要目的是分享国际生物医学工程荣誉学会 Alpha Eta Mu Beta 制定的创新设计解决方案指导(MINDS)学者计划。该计划的目标是:(1) 将生物医学工程专业的学生引入一个开放式的设计体验中,让他们与行业和教师导师组成跨大学团队;(2) 培养学生在具有不同背景和专业领域的团队中进行考虑临床转化的设计能力。MINDS 采用体验式学习方法:(1)通过机构间合作丰富学生的课程体验;(2)培养工程设计技能,包括临床/商业成功的三个关键设计考虑因素:知识产权保护、监管策略和市场识别;以及(3)强调最终用户考虑因素的重要性。从 2015 年到 2022 年,MINDS 共有来自 50 所大学的 131 名学生和 22 名教师及行业导师参与。计划前后的调查显示,学生对设计流程、监管策略、知识产权保护、市场定义以及关键产品要求和功能的理解有了统计学意义上的显著提高。学生们还提高了沟通和团队合作技能。许多学生表示,MINDS 的参与使他们更有可能选择涉及产品开发和/或创业的职业。学生们获得了将市场需求、监管策略和知识产权因素融入设计过程的工作能力。他们还进一步发展了软技能,如解决冲突、时间管理和通过机构间合作的挑战进行有效沟通。此外,该计划还提高了他们对生物医学设备和技术如何造福社会的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Practical Research Methods Course That Teaches How to Be a Successful Biomedical Engineering Graduate Student Lessons from Developing a Rubric for Evaluating Need Statements on Health Technology Innovation Projects Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Systems Thinking in Synthetic Biology Design: A Qualitative Descriptive Study Coming Full Circle: The 360° Experience for Biomedical Engineering Technology Students Incorporating a Hands-On Device-Based Activity in a Human Factors Biomedical Engineering Course in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1