Characteristics of US combat veterans (2001-2011) who remain on active duty after upper extremity amputations.

U.S. Army Medical Department journal Pub Date : 2017-07-01
Sara H Kift, Taylor J Bates, Nathan A Franklin, Anthony E Johnson
{"title":"Characteristics of US combat veterans (2001-2011) who remain on active duty after upper extremity amputations.","authors":"Sara H Kift,&nbsp;Taylor J Bates,&nbsp;Nathan A Franklin,&nbsp;Anthony E Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Return to duty following traumatic amputations has been extensively studied in those with lower extremity amputation. As upper extremity amputations occur less frequently, the issue of return to duty for those with upper extremity amputations has received relatively little research. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate at which service members remain on active duty at least one year after having sustained traumatic upper extremity amputations during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, and other overseas contingency operations of the Global War on Terrorism.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Military, Academic Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred eighteen patients who sustained combat-related upper extremity amputations between October 2001 and December 2011.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Data was obtained from the medical record for these 118 patients.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Percentage of service member remaining on active duty one year following an upper extremity amputation, and evaluation of demographic and injury related factors associated with retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate for the upper extremity amputees studied at one year from injury who remained on active duty was 47%. Officers were more likely to remain on active duty than their enlisted counterparts (P=.021) and patients who sustained burns were also more likely to remain on active duty than patients with similar amputation types without concomitant burn injuries (P=.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of service members with traumatic upper extremity amputations who were still on active duty status 1-year postinjury was 47%. The presence of burns and rank were significant factors when examining retention on active duty. Further study on war casualties who sustain upper-extremity traumatic amputations with and without burns is required to optimize outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":88789,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","volume":" 2-17","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Return to duty following traumatic amputations has been extensively studied in those with lower extremity amputation. As upper extremity amputations occur less frequently, the issue of return to duty for those with upper extremity amputations has received relatively little research. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate at which service members remain on active duty at least one year after having sustained traumatic upper extremity amputations during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, and other overseas contingency operations of the Global War on Terrorism.

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Military, Academic Level 1 trauma center.

Patients: One hundred eighteen patients who sustained combat-related upper extremity amputations between October 2001 and December 2011.

Intervention: Data was obtained from the medical record for these 118 patients.

Main outcome measurements: Percentage of service member remaining on active duty one year following an upper extremity amputation, and evaluation of demographic and injury related factors associated with retention.

Results: The overall rate for the upper extremity amputees studied at one year from injury who remained on active duty was 47%. Officers were more likely to remain on active duty than their enlisted counterparts (P=.021) and patients who sustained burns were also more likely to remain on active duty than patients with similar amputation types without concomitant burn injuries (P=.039).

Conclusions: The rate of service members with traumatic upper extremity amputations who were still on active duty status 1-year postinjury was 47%. The presence of burns and rank were significant factors when examining retention on active duty. Further study on war casualties who sustain upper-extremity traumatic amputations with and without burns is required to optimize outcomes in this population.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上肢截肢后仍在服役的美国退伍军人的特征(2001-2011)。
目的:对下肢截肢患者创伤性截肢后重返工作岗位进行了广泛的研究。由于上肢截肢发生的频率较低,上肢截肢者重返工作岗位的问题得到的研究相对较少。本研究的目的是确定在伊拉克自由行动、持久自由行动和其他全球反恐战争的海外应急行动中,遭受创伤性上肢截肢至少一年的军人继续服役的比率。设计:回顾性。单位:军事,学术一级创伤中心。患者:2001年10月至2011年12月期间,118名因战斗导致上肢截肢的患者。干预:从这118例患者的病历中获取数据。主要结果测量:上肢截肢一年后仍在现役的服役人员的百分比,以及与保留相关的人口统计学和伤害相关因素的评估。结果:上肢截肢者受伤一年后仍在服役的总体比率为47%。军官比士兵更有可能继续服役(P= 0.021),持续烧伤的患者也比类似截肢类型但没有伴随烧伤的患者更有可能继续服役(P= 0.039)。结论:创伤性上肢截肢军人伤后1年仍在服役的比例为47%。在检查保留现役时,烧伤和军衔的存在是重要因素。需要对上肢创伤性截肢伴或不伴烧伤的战争伤亡进行进一步研究,以优化这一人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMMANDER’S INTRODUCTION Fresh Frozen Plasma Animal Derived Thiol Induced Work Exacerbated Asthma: A Brief Case Report of a Unique Workplace Hazard. Motivational Guest Speaker Presentation as an Anti-Stigma Intervention for US Army Soldiers. Lessons Learned: Military Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1