Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography in NAFLD: Review Study.

Abdullah M Ozercan, Hasan Ozkan
{"title":"Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography in NAFLD: Review Study.","authors":"Abdullah M Ozercan,&nbsp;Hasan Ozkan","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study, we aimed to provide information about transient elastography, a noninvasive method that shows liver steatosis and fibrosis, and to review diagnostic accuracy studies in the literature.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver diseases. It has a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic steatosis to cirrhosis with complications that can lead to mortality. Although its frequency varies geographically, it is believed that one out of every four people in the world has NAFLD. Recently, the number of studies about the noninvasive diagnosis of NAFLD and liver fibrosis is increasing. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is a method used for about two decades and provides important information in determining steatosis and fibrosis in the liver.</p><p><strong>Review results: </strong>Area under curve (AUC) levels for ≥S1 are between 0.8 and 0.95 in studies showing the accuracy of the CAP score in detecting steatosis. Sensitivity is between 68 and 87% and specificity is 74 and 91%. AUC levels for steatosis ≥S2 range from 0.73 to 0.88. Sensitivity is between 77 and 85% and specificity is 59 and 81%. For detecting ≥S3, AUC levels were 0.69 to 0.94 and the sensitivity and specificity were 71 to 88%, and 58 to 89%, respectively. In studies, evaluating the effectiveness of elastography in determining the level of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD: AUC was between 0.79 and 0.87, sensitivity was 62 and 94%, and specificity was 61 and 100% for F ≥2. Area under curve was 0.76 to 0.98, sensitivity was 65 to 100% and specificity was 75 to 97% for ≥F3. Area under curve was ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 and sensitivity was 78 to 100% and specificity was 76 to 98% for ≥F4. The studies about the comparison of FibroScan and novel transient elastography device (FibroTouch) reported that results are correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.5-0.6) and the AUC of FibroTouch to detect fibrosis is nearly 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUROC in studies are mostly above 0.80 in detecting steatosis and detecting the presence of fibrosis in patients diagnosed with NAFLD indicates the reliability of the data obtained. Transient elastography is suggested by the international guidelines for diagnosing NAFLD, especially the decision of biopsy. FibroTouch was found correlated with FibroScan but further studies are necessary to indicate that FibroTouch can be used instead of FibroScan.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Ozercan AM, Ozkan H. Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography in NAFLD: Review Study. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2022;12(Suppl 1):S41-S45.</p>","PeriodicalId":11992,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","volume":"12 Suppl 1","pages":"S41-S45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/3a/ejohg-12-s41.PMC9681576.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to provide information about transient elastography, a noninvasive method that shows liver steatosis and fibrosis, and to review diagnostic accuracy studies in the literature.

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver diseases. It has a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic steatosis to cirrhosis with complications that can lead to mortality. Although its frequency varies geographically, it is believed that one out of every four people in the world has NAFLD. Recently, the number of studies about the noninvasive diagnosis of NAFLD and liver fibrosis is increasing. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is a method used for about two decades and provides important information in determining steatosis and fibrosis in the liver.

Review results: Area under curve (AUC) levels for ≥S1 are between 0.8 and 0.95 in studies showing the accuracy of the CAP score in detecting steatosis. Sensitivity is between 68 and 87% and specificity is 74 and 91%. AUC levels for steatosis ≥S2 range from 0.73 to 0.88. Sensitivity is between 77 and 85% and specificity is 59 and 81%. For detecting ≥S3, AUC levels were 0.69 to 0.94 and the sensitivity and specificity were 71 to 88%, and 58 to 89%, respectively. In studies, evaluating the effectiveness of elastography in determining the level of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD: AUC was between 0.79 and 0.87, sensitivity was 62 and 94%, and specificity was 61 and 100% for F ≥2. Area under curve was 0.76 to 0.98, sensitivity was 65 to 100% and specificity was 75 to 97% for ≥F3. Area under curve was ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 and sensitivity was 78 to 100% and specificity was 76 to 98% for ≥F4. The studies about the comparison of FibroScan and novel transient elastography device (FibroTouch) reported that results are correlated (r = 0.5-0.6) and the AUC of FibroTouch to detect fibrosis is nearly 0.8.

Conclusion: AUROC in studies are mostly above 0.80 in detecting steatosis and detecting the presence of fibrosis in patients diagnosed with NAFLD indicates the reliability of the data obtained. Transient elastography is suggested by the international guidelines for diagnosing NAFLD, especially the decision of biopsy. FibroTouch was found correlated with FibroScan but further studies are necessary to indicate that FibroTouch can be used instead of FibroScan.

How to cite this article: Ozercan AM, Ozkan H. Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography in NAFLD: Review Study. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2022;12(Suppl 1):S41-S45.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NAFLD的振动控制瞬态弹性成像研究综述。
目的:在本研究中,我们旨在提供有关瞬时弹性成像的信息,这是一种显示肝脏脂肪变性和纤维化的无创方法,并回顾文献中诊断准确性的研究。背景:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是慢性肝病最常见的病因。它具有广泛的临床范围,从无症状脂肪变性到肝硬化,并伴有可导致死亡的并发症。尽管其频率因地域而异,但据信世界上每四个人中就有一个患有NAFLD。近年来,关于NAFLD和肝纤维化无创诊断的研究越来越多。振动控制瞬态弹性成像(VCTE)是一种使用了大约二十年的方法,为确定肝脏脂肪变性和纤维化提供了重要信息。回顾结果:研究表明,≥S1的曲线下面积(AUC)水平在0.8到0.95之间,表明CAP评分在检测脂肪变性方面的准确性。灵敏度为68% ~ 87%,特异性为74% ~ 91%。脂肪变性≥S2的AUC水平在0.73 ~ 0.88之间。灵敏度为77 ~ 85%,特异性为59 ~ 81%。对于≥S3的检测,AUC水平为0.69 ~ 0.94,敏感性为71 ~ 88%,特异性为58 ~ 89%。在研究中,评估弹性成像测定NAFLD患者纤维化水平的有效性:AUC在0.79 ~ 0.87之间,敏感性为62% ~ 94%,F≥2时特异性为61% ~ 100%。曲线下面积为0.76 ~ 0.98,敏感性为65 ~ 100%,特异性为75 ~ 97%。曲线下面积为0.91 ~ 0.99,敏感性为78 ~ 100%,特异性为76 ~ 98%。关于FibroScan与新型瞬时弹性成像装置(FibroTouch)比较的研究报道,结果是相关的(r = 0.5-0.6),并且FibroTouch检测纤维化的AUC接近0.8。结论:研究中检测脂肪变性和检测NAFLD患者是否存在纤维化的AUROC大多在0.80以上,说明所得数据的可靠性。瞬时弹性成像被国际指南推荐用于诊断NAFLD,特别是活检的决定。FibroTouch被发现与FibroScan相关,但需要进一步的研究来证明FibroTouch可以代替FibroScan。引用本文:Ozercan AM, Ozkan H.振动控制瞬态弹性成像在NAFLD中的研究进展。中华肝病与胃肠病杂志,2010;12(增刊1):441 - 445。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scientific Insights for Drug Development Based on Normal Habitat of Tribal Population of Manipur: An Observational Study Regarding the Implication of “Houttuynia cordata” Can the Inflammatory Cell Ratio NLR and PLR be Used as a Reliable Marker in Colon Cancer? A Prospective Study Memories of Professor HASAN Ozkan: Blowing in the Wind The Journal Moving to an Adult State The Hooking Technique for Retrograde Freehand Access during Direct Cholangioscopy (with Video).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1