Validation of the Remote Automated ki:e Speech Biomarker for Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Verification and Validation following DiME V3 Framework.

Q1 Computer Science Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2022-09-30 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000526471
Johannes Tröger, Ebru Baykara, Jian Zhao, Daphne Ter Huurne, Nina Possemis, Elisa Mallick, Simona Schäfer, Louisa Schwed, Mario Mina, Nicklas Linz, Inez Ramakers, Craig Ritchie
{"title":"Validation of the Remote Automated ki:e Speech Biomarker for Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Verification and Validation following DiME V3 Framework.","authors":"Johannes Tröger,&nbsp;Ebru Baykara,&nbsp;Jian Zhao,&nbsp;Daphne Ter Huurne,&nbsp;Nina Possemis,&nbsp;Elisa Mallick,&nbsp;Simona Schäfer,&nbsp;Louisa Schwed,&nbsp;Mario Mina,&nbsp;Nicklas Linz,&nbsp;Inez Ramakers,&nbsp;Craig Ritchie","doi":"10.1159/000526471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Progressive cognitive decline is the cardinal behavioral symptom in most dementia-causing diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. While most well-established measures for cognition might not fit tomorrow's decentralized remote clinical trials, digital cognitive assessments will gain importance. We present the evaluation of a novel digital speech biomarker for cognition (SB-C) following the Digital Medicine Society's V3 framework: verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evaluation was done in two independent clinical samples: the Dutch DeepSpA (<i>N</i> = 69 subjective cognitive impairment [SCI], <i>N</i> = 52 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and <i>N</i> = 13 dementia) and the Scottish SPeAk datasets (<i>N</i> = 25, healthy controls). For validation, two anchor scores were used: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Verification</i>: The SB-C could be reliably extracted for both languages using an automatic speech processing pipeline. <i>Analytical Validation</i>: In both languages, the SB-C was strongly correlated with MMSE scores. <i>Clinical Validation:</i> The SB-C significantly differed between clinical groups (including MCI and dementia), was strongly correlated with the CDR, and could track the clinically meaningful decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the ki:e SB-C is an objective, scalable, and reliable indicator of cognitive decline, fit for purpose as a remote assessment in clinical early dementia trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"6 3","pages":"107-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/f9/dib-0006-0107.PMC9710455.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Progressive cognitive decline is the cardinal behavioral symptom in most dementia-causing diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. While most well-established measures for cognition might not fit tomorrow's decentralized remote clinical trials, digital cognitive assessments will gain importance. We present the evaluation of a novel digital speech biomarker for cognition (SB-C) following the Digital Medicine Society's V3 framework: verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation.

Methods: Evaluation was done in two independent clinical samples: the Dutch DeepSpA (N = 69 subjective cognitive impairment [SCI], N = 52 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and N = 13 dementia) and the Scottish SPeAk datasets (N = 25, healthy controls). For validation, two anchor scores were used: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale.

Results: Verification: The SB-C could be reliably extracted for both languages using an automatic speech processing pipeline. Analytical Validation: In both languages, the SB-C was strongly correlated with MMSE scores. Clinical Validation: The SB-C significantly differed between clinical groups (including MCI and dementia), was strongly correlated with the CDR, and could track the clinically meaningful decline.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the ki:e SB-C is an objective, scalable, and reliable indicator of cognitive decline, fit for purpose as a remote assessment in clinical early dementia trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度认知障碍的远程自动语音生物标志物的验证:DiME V3框架的验证和验证。
进行性认知能力下降是阿尔茨海默病等大多数痴呆性疾病的主要行为症状。虽然大多数公认的认知测量方法可能不适合未来分散的远程临床试验,但数字认知评估将变得越来越重要。我们根据数字医学协会的V3框架对一种新的认知数字语音生物标志物(SB-C)进行了评估:验证、分析验证和临床验证。方法:在两个独立的临床样本中进行评估:荷兰DeepSpA (N = 69主观认知障碍[SCI], N = 52轻度认知障碍[MCI], N = 13痴呆)和苏格兰SPeAk数据集(N = 25健康对照)。为了验证,使用了两个锚点评分:迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和临床痴呆评分(CDR)量表。结果:验证:使用自动语音处理管道可以可靠地提取两种语言的SB-C。分析验证:在两种语言中,SB-C与MMSE得分密切相关。临床验证:SB-C在临床组间(包括MCI和痴呆)差异显著,与CDR强相关,可追踪临床有意义的下降。结论:我们的研究结果表明,ki:e SB-C是一种客观、可扩展和可靠的认知能力下降指标,适合作为临床早期痴呆试验的远程评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Imperative of Voice Data Collection in Clinical Trials. eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Detecting Longitudinal Trends between Passively Collected Phone Use and Anxiety among College Students. Video Assessment to Detect Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Digital Vocal Biomarker of Smoking Status Using Ecological Audio Recordings: Results from the Colive Voice Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1