Job satisfaction criteria to improve general practitioner recruitment: a Delphi consensus.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmac140
Bernard Le Floch, Hilde Bastiaens, Jean-Yves Le Reste, Patrice Nabbe, Perrine Le Floch, Mael Cam, Tristan Montier, Lieve Peremans
{"title":"Job satisfaction criteria to improve general practitioner recruitment: a Delphi consensus.","authors":"Bernard Le Floch, Hilde Bastiaens, Jean-Yves Le Reste, Patrice Nabbe, Perrine Le Floch, Mael Cam, Tristan Montier, Lieve Peremans","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical general practitioner (GP) workforce is decreasing. Many studies have analysed the negative aspects of the profession but, few examine the positive aspects and job satisfaction. A European collaborative group including 8 participating countries recently conducted a qualitative study to analyse the positive factors and found 31 job satisfaction factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine which of these 31 factors are important and applicable to future policies to improve family medicine attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in France.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Delphi consensus method was chosen. Two Delphi rounds were conducted in March-April 2017 and retained satisfaction factors with at least 70% of scores ≥7. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank these retained factors. Participants assigned 5 points to the factor they considered most important, 3 points to the second, and 1 point to the third. Factors receiving at least 5% (10 points) of the total points (198 points) were included in the final list. The expert panel included GPs and non-GPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine experts began the procedure and 22 completed it. Thirty factors were retained after the 2 Delphi rounds. The NGT resulted in 8 factors: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of the patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 8 job satisfaction factors are important to consider and apply to future policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical general practitioner (GP) workforce is decreasing. Many studies have analysed the negative aspects of the profession but, few examine the positive aspects and job satisfaction. A European collaborative group including 8 participating countries recently conducted a qualitative study to analyse the positive factors and found 31 job satisfaction factors.

Objectives: To determine which of these 31 factors are important and applicable to future policies to improve family medicine attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in France.

Method: The Delphi consensus method was chosen. Two Delphi rounds were conducted in March-April 2017 and retained satisfaction factors with at least 70% of scores ≥7. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank these retained factors. Participants assigned 5 points to the factor they considered most important, 3 points to the second, and 1 point to the third. Factors receiving at least 5% (10 points) of the total points (198 points) were included in the final list. The expert panel included GPs and non-GPs.

Results: Twenty-nine experts began the procedure and 22 completed it. Thirty factors were retained after the 2 Delphi rounds. The NGT resulted in 8 factors: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of the patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration.

Conclusion: These 8 job satisfaction factors are important to consider and apply to future policy development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善全科医生招聘的工作满意度标准:德尔菲共识。
背景:临床全科医生(GP)队伍正在减少。许多研究分析了这一职业的消极方面,但很少研究其积极方面和工作满意度。最近,一个包括 8 个参与国在内的欧洲合作小组开展了一项定性研究,对积极因素进行了分析,发现了 31 个工作满意度因素:确定这 31 个因素中哪些因素是重要的,并适用于未来的政策,以提高法国家庭医学的吸引力、招聘和留住人才:方法:选择德尔菲共识法。2017年3月至4月进行了两轮德尔菲讨论,保留了至少70%得分≥7分的满意度因素。采用名义小组技术(NGT)对这些保留的因素进行排序。参与者为他们认为最重要的因素分配 5 分,为第二因素分配 3 分,为第三因素分配 1 分。获得总分(198 分)至少 5%(10 分)的因素被列入最终名单。专家小组成员包括全科医生和非全科医生:结果:29 位专家开始了这一程序,22 位专家完成了这一程序。经过两轮德尔菲讨论后,保留了 30 个因素。NGT 得出了 8 个因素:(i) 从事家庭医疗,照顾病人;(ii) 护理协调,倡导病人权益;(iii) 工作的灵活性;(iv) 努力成为以人为本的医生;(v) 参与医疗组织;(vi) 受益于管理良好的实践;(vii) 成为教师、培训师;(viii) 高效的专业合作:这 8 个工作满意度因素是未来政策制定中需要考虑和应用的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1