Effects of mandatory screening labs in directing the disposition of the apparently healthy psychiatric patient in the emergency department.

U.S. Army Medical Department journal Pub Date : 2017-07-01
Karyn E Kagel, Meghan Smith, Ilya V Latyshenko, Christopher Mitchell, Andrew Kagel
{"title":"Effects of mandatory screening labs in directing the disposition of the apparently healthy psychiatric patient in the emergency department.","authors":"Karyn E Kagel,&nbsp;Meghan Smith,&nbsp;Ilya V Latyshenko,&nbsp;Christopher Mitchell,&nbsp;Andrew Kagel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether mandatory psychiatric admission laboratory tests yield results that change the disposition of a patient with primary psychiatric complaint from admission to a psychiatric service to admission to a medical service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center retrospective cohort chart review study approved by the facility Institutional Review Board in which we used a records database maintained by the emergency department's social workers to access the records of every patient that presented to our emergency department with a psychiatric chief complaint between the dates of December 1, 2011, and December 1, 2013. We focused on those that were admitted to either a psychiatric service or a medical service after a thorough evaluation by the department of social work and an emergency provider. We applied our inclusion and exclusion criteria and reviewed the results of the mandatory psychiatric laboratory tests (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, thyroid stimulating hormone, acetaminophen, aspirin, blood alcohol level, urinalysis, urine pregnancy test, urine drug screen) required for admission. Our independent variables were the compulsory psychiatric admission laboratory tests and our dependent variable was the admission to a medical service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5,606 laboratory tests that were ordered and produced results for the 682 patients enrolled in our study, 51 results were considered clinically significant abnormal results, or results requiring treatment prior to psychiatric service admission, by the 2 reviewing emergency physicians. Only one of 682 psychiatric patients received a final disposition to a medical service based upon abnormal laboratory studies. That patient presented without any medical complaints but a chief complaint of \"suicidal ideation,\" and was found to have diabetic ketoacidosis. Based on our data, the probability that an abnormal laboratory test will result in a change in disposition is 1/682=0.1% (95% CI: 0.0% to 0.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients presenting to the emergency department with a psychiatric chief complaint and no physical complaints, abnormal vital signs, or abnormal physical exam findings have less than 1% probability that an abnormal laboratory study will change their disposition from a psychiatric admission to a medical admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":88789,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","volume":" 2-17","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Army Medical Department journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether mandatory psychiatric admission laboratory tests yield results that change the disposition of a patient with primary psychiatric complaint from admission to a psychiatric service to admission to a medical service.

Methods: This was a single center retrospective cohort chart review study approved by the facility Institutional Review Board in which we used a records database maintained by the emergency department's social workers to access the records of every patient that presented to our emergency department with a psychiatric chief complaint between the dates of December 1, 2011, and December 1, 2013. We focused on those that were admitted to either a psychiatric service or a medical service after a thorough evaluation by the department of social work and an emergency provider. We applied our inclusion and exclusion criteria and reviewed the results of the mandatory psychiatric laboratory tests (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, thyroid stimulating hormone, acetaminophen, aspirin, blood alcohol level, urinalysis, urine pregnancy test, urine drug screen) required for admission. Our independent variables were the compulsory psychiatric admission laboratory tests and our dependent variable was the admission to a medical service.

Results: Of 5,606 laboratory tests that were ordered and produced results for the 682 patients enrolled in our study, 51 results were considered clinically significant abnormal results, or results requiring treatment prior to psychiatric service admission, by the 2 reviewing emergency physicians. Only one of 682 psychiatric patients received a final disposition to a medical service based upon abnormal laboratory studies. That patient presented without any medical complaints but a chief complaint of "suicidal ideation," and was found to have diabetic ketoacidosis. Based on our data, the probability that an abnormal laboratory test will result in a change in disposition is 1/682=0.1% (95% CI: 0.0% to 0.9%).

Conclusion: Patients presenting to the emergency department with a psychiatric chief complaint and no physical complaints, abnormal vital signs, or abnormal physical exam findings have less than 1% probability that an abnormal laboratory study will change their disposition from a psychiatric admission to a medical admission.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性筛查实验室在指导急诊处理表面健康的精神病患者中的作用。
目的:确定强制性的精神科入院实验室检查是否产生了改变患者的处置从入院精神科服务到入院医疗服务的主要精神疾患的结果。方法:这是一项由机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性队列研究,我们使用急诊科社会工作者维护的记录数据库来访问2011年12月1日至2013年12月1日期间以精神科主诉来急诊科就诊的每位患者的记录。我们关注的是那些在经过社会工作部门和急救人员的全面评估后被送往精神科服务或医疗服务的人。我们应用我们的纳入和排除标准,并审查了入院所需的强制性精神病学实验室检查的结果(全血细胞计数、综合代谢小组、促甲状腺激素、对乙酰氨基酚、阿司匹林、血液酒精水平、尿液分析、尿妊娠试验、尿药物筛查)。我们的自变量是强制性精神病入院实验室检查,因变量是接受医疗服务的情况。结果:在我们研究的682名患者的5606项实验室检查中,有51项结果被2名急诊医生认为是临床显著的异常结果,或需要在入院前进行治疗的结果。在682名精神病患者中,只有一人根据异常的实验室研究结果接受了医疗服务的最终处置。该患者无任何医学主诉,但主诉为“自杀意念”,并被发现患有糖尿病酮症酸中毒。根据我们的数据,异常的实验室检查导致性情改变的概率为1/682=0.1% (95% CI: 0.0%至0.9%)。结论:以精神科为主诉,无躯体主诉、生命体征异常或体格检查结果异常的患者就诊于急诊科的概率小于1%,异常的实验室检查将改变他们从精神科住院到医学住院的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMMANDER’S INTRODUCTION Fresh Frozen Plasma Animal Derived Thiol Induced Work Exacerbated Asthma: A Brief Case Report of a Unique Workplace Hazard. Motivational Guest Speaker Presentation as an Anti-Stigma Intervention for US Army Soldiers. Lessons Learned: Military Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1