Predictability, control, and the pituitary-adrenal response in rats.

H Davis, S Levine
{"title":"Predictability, control, and the pituitary-adrenal response in rats.","authors":"H Davis,&nbsp;S Levine","doi":"10.1037/h0077892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five experiments were performed to compare to effects of signaled and unsignaled shock on the pituitary-adrenal response of rats. In Experimental 1, exposure to the two procedures yielded no difference in plasma corticosterone levels. In Experiment 2, the addition of a food-reinforced lever-pressing baseline produced conditioned suppression in the signaled condition but bo group difference in steroid values. In Experiment 3, in order to guard against steroid elevations produced by exposure to shock per se, blood samples were obtained during brief test sessions prior to the occurrence of shock. The procedure resulted in a significant elevation in the steroid levels of the signaled shock group. In Experiment 4, a within-subjects sampling procedure revealed that disparate group steroid values obtained earlier in the session had converged by the end of the test session. The final experiment replicated the original failure to obtain a steroid difference due to predictability in the absence of a behavioral baseline, despite the fact that blood samples were obtained by using the early \"probe\" sampling procedure. Collectively, these results suggest that (a) the effects of predictability are largely seen in the temporal pattern of steroid elevation and not in their terminal values, (b) the effects of predictability on steroids are modulated by the availability of control, and (c) control is not confined to the stimulus that is being predicted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","volume":" ","pages":"393-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0077892","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Five experiments were performed to compare to effects of signaled and unsignaled shock on the pituitary-adrenal response of rats. In Experimental 1, exposure to the two procedures yielded no difference in plasma corticosterone levels. In Experiment 2, the addition of a food-reinforced lever-pressing baseline produced conditioned suppression in the signaled condition but bo group difference in steroid values. In Experiment 3, in order to guard against steroid elevations produced by exposure to shock per se, blood samples were obtained during brief test sessions prior to the occurrence of shock. The procedure resulted in a significant elevation in the steroid levels of the signaled shock group. In Experiment 4, a within-subjects sampling procedure revealed that disparate group steroid values obtained earlier in the session had converged by the end of the test session. The final experiment replicated the original failure to obtain a steroid difference due to predictability in the absence of a behavioral baseline, despite the fact that blood samples were obtained by using the early "probe" sampling procedure. Collectively, these results suggest that (a) the effects of predictability are largely seen in the temporal pattern of steroid elevation and not in their terminal values, (b) the effects of predictability on steroids are modulated by the availability of control, and (c) control is not confined to the stimulus that is being predicted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大鼠的可预测性、控制和垂体-肾上腺反应。
通过5个实验比较了信号性和非信号性电击对大鼠垂体-肾上腺反应的影响。在实验1中,暴露于两种程序中血浆皮质酮水平没有差异。在实验2中,添加食物增强的杠杆按压基线在信号条件下产生条件抑制,但在类固醇值上没有组间差异。在实验3中,为了防止暴露于休克本身产生的类固醇升高,在休克发生之前的短暂测试期间获得血液样本。这个过程导致信号休克组的类固醇水平显著升高。在实验4中,受试者内部抽样程序显示,在测试阶段早期获得的不同组类固醇值在测试阶段结束时趋于一致。尽管血液样本是通过使用早期的“探针”取样程序获得的,但由于缺乏行为基线的可预测性,最终的实验重复了最初的失败,即无法获得类固醇差异。总的来说,这些结果表明:(a)可预测性的影响主要体现在类固醇升高的时间模式中,而不是在它们的最终值中;(b)可预测性对类固醇的影响是由控制的可用性调节的;(c)控制并不局限于正在预测的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavioral consequences of agonistic experience in rats: sex differences and the effects of testosterone. Parental factors in the sensitization and habituation of territorial aggression in the convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum). Laboratory observations of aggregative behavior of garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis: roles of the visual, olfactory, and vomeronasal senses. Competitive behavior in male, female, and pseudohermaphroditic female dogs. Behavior of rhesus monkeys during artificial menstrual cycles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1