Diagnostic accuracy of carious lesions in digital radiographs at a public dental clinic - can it be improved by optimizing viewing conditions and further education?.

Q Dentistry Swedish dental journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Jane Westerberg, Kristina Hellén-Halme
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of carious lesions in digital radiographs at a public dental clinic - can it be improved by optimizing viewing conditions and further education?.","authors":"Aleksandar Milosavljevic,&nbsp;Jane Westerberg,&nbsp;Kristina Hellén-Halme","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of digital dental radiograpny for detecting carious lesions on approximal surfaces before and after optimization of the environ- ment, and after joint training on evaluation and review of x-rays. A further aim was to evaluate differences in diagnostic accuracy between general dental practitioners (GDPs) and dental hygienists (DHs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred extracted teeth (premolars and molars) underwent standardized radiography. Eleven participants (seven GDPs and four DHs) evaluated digital images for approximal carious lesions in three sessions: (1) at current conditions with no optimization or further training, (2) under optimized viewing conditions, and (3) under optimized viewing conditions after a short educational session. Receiver operating characteristic curves were,used to evaluate the results. Histological evaluation was made and served as a cri- terion standard for differentiating sound teeth and teeth with carious lesions. Kappa statistics evaluated intra-observer agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy in the GDP group differed sig- nificantlyfor all types of carious lesions between the first and third evaluations (p=0.002), and also between the second and third (p=0.015). Diagnostic accuracy also differed significantly for carious lesions into the dentin between the first and third evaluations (p=0.010) and between the second and third (p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the staff had optimized the environment when evaluating digital radiographs. A short educational session highlighting the difficulty of caries diagnostics in digital dental radiography can increase diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy in the detection of approximal carious lesions on digital radiographs did not differ between GDPs and DHs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22114,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of digital dental radiograpny for detecting carious lesions on approximal surfaces before and after optimization of the environ- ment, and after joint training on evaluation and review of x-rays. A further aim was to evaluate differences in diagnostic accuracy between general dental practitioners (GDPs) and dental hygienists (DHs).

Materials and methods: One hundred extracted teeth (premolars and molars) underwent standardized radiography. Eleven participants (seven GDPs and four DHs) evaluated digital images for approximal carious lesions in three sessions: (1) at current conditions with no optimization or further training, (2) under optimized viewing conditions, and (3) under optimized viewing conditions after a short educational session. Receiver operating characteristic curves were,used to evaluate the results. Histological evaluation was made and served as a cri- terion standard for differentiating sound teeth and teeth with carious lesions. Kappa statistics evaluated intra-observer agreement.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy in the GDP group differed sig- nificantlyfor all types of carious lesions between the first and third evaluations (p=0.002), and also between the second and third (p=0.015). Diagnostic accuracy also differed significantly for carious lesions into the dentin between the first and third evaluations (p=0.010) and between the second and third (p=0.015).

Conclusion: Most of the staff had optimized the environment when evaluating digital radiographs. A short educational session highlighting the difficulty of caries diagnostics in digital dental radiography can increase diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy in the detection of approximal carious lesions on digital radiographs did not differ between GDPs and DHs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立牙科诊所数字x线片对龋齿病变的诊断准确性——能否通过优化观察条件和进一步教育来提高?
目的:探讨在环境优化前后、x线评价复习联合训练后,数字牙x线对近表面龋病的诊断准确性。进一步的目的是评估普通牙科医生(GDPs)和牙科保健师(DHs)之间诊断准确性的差异。材料和方法:100颗拔牙(前磨牙和磨牙)进行标准化x线摄影。11名参与者(7名gdp和4名DHs)在三个阶段评估了近似龋齿病变的数字图像:(1)在没有优化或进一步培训的当前条件下,(2)在优化的观看条件下,(3)在短暂教育后的优化观看条件下。采用受试者工作特征曲线对结果进行评价。进行组织学评价,作为鉴别健全牙与龋齿的标准。Kappa统计评估了观察员内部的一致性。结果:GDP组对所有类型的龋齿病变的诊断准确性在第一次和第三次评估之间差异显著(p=0.002),在第二次和第三次评估之间差异显著(p=0.015)。在第一次和第三次评估(p=0.010)和第二次和第三次评估(p=0.015)之间,牙本质龋齿病变的诊断准确性也有显著差异。结论:大多数工作人员在评价数字x线片时,对环境进行了优化。一个简短的教育会议,强调在数字牙科放射摄影中诊断龋齿的困难,可以提高诊断的准确性。在数字x线片上检测近似龋齿病变的诊断准确性在gdp和DHs之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swedish dental journal
Swedish dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
0.85
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Swedish Dental Journal is the scientific journal of the Swedish Dental Association and the Swedish Dental Society. It is published 4 times a year to promote practice, education and research within odontology. Manuscripts containing original research are accepted for consideraion if neither the article nor any part of its essential substance has been or will be published elsewhere. Reviews, Case Reports and Short Communications will also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Adverbs Verbs Punctuation Conjunctions Prepositions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1