TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in cirrhosis: A meta-analysis update.

Hu Zhang, Hui Zhang, Hui Li, Heng Zhang, Dan Zheng, Chen-Ming Sun, Jie Wu
{"title":"TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in cirrhosis: A meta-analysis update.","authors":"Hu Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Heng Zhang,&nbsp;Dan Zheng,&nbsp;Chen-Ming Sun,&nbsp;Jie Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic therapy (ET) is most common method for preventing variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, but the outcomes are not perfect. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is introduced into clinical practice. However, the beneficial effects of TIPS compared to ET on cirrhotic patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of TIPS with those of the most frequently used ET for prevention of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in liver cirrhosis. The Pub-Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2017. The primary study outcomes included the incidence of VRB, all-cause mortality, bleeding-related death, and the incidence of post-treatment hepatic encephalopathy (PTE). The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous variables. Subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-four studies were eligible and they included 1120 subjects treated with TIPS and 1065 subjects treated with ET. Although there was no significant difference in survival and PTE, TIPS was superior to ET in decreasing the incidence of VRB (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39, P<0.00001), and decreasing the incidence of bleeding-related death (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis found a lower mortality (OR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.97; P=0.04) without any increased incidence of PTE (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.75-2.50; P=0.31) in the studies of a greater proportion (≥40%) of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis receiving TIPS, and TIPS with covered stent did not increase the risk of PTE compared to ET (OR=1.52, 95% CI =0.82-2.80, P=0.18). It was concluded that TIPS with covered stent might be considered the preferred choice of therapy in patients with severe liver disease for secondary prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","volume":"37 4","pages":"475-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Endoscopic therapy (ET) is most common method for preventing variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, but the outcomes are not perfect. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is introduced into clinical practice. However, the beneficial effects of TIPS compared to ET on cirrhotic patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of TIPS with those of the most frequently used ET for prevention of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in liver cirrhosis. The Pub-Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2017. The primary study outcomes included the incidence of VRB, all-cause mortality, bleeding-related death, and the incidence of post-treatment hepatic encephalopathy (PTE). The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous variables. Subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-four studies were eligible and they included 1120 subjects treated with TIPS and 1065 subjects treated with ET. Although there was no significant difference in survival and PTE, TIPS was superior to ET in decreasing the incidence of VRB (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39, P<0.00001), and decreasing the incidence of bleeding-related death (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis found a lower mortality (OR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.97; P=0.04) without any increased incidence of PTE (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.75-2.50; P=0.31) in the studies of a greater proportion (≥40%) of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis receiving TIPS, and TIPS with covered stent did not increase the risk of PTE compared to ET (OR=1.52, 95% CI =0.82-2.80, P=0.18). It was concluded that TIPS with covered stent might be considered the preferred choice of therapy in patients with severe liver disease for secondary prophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TIPS与内窥镜治疗肝硬化静脉曲张再出血:最新荟萃分析。
内镜治疗(ET)是预防肝硬化静脉曲张出血最常用的方法,但效果并不理想。近年来,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)被引入临床实践。然而,与ET相比,TIPS对肝硬化患者的有益作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估和比较TIPS与最常用的ET预防肝硬化静脉曲张再出血(VRB)的效果。检索了pubm - med、EMBASE和Cochrane Library数据库,检索时间从成立到2017年2月。主要研究结果包括VRB的发生率、全因死亡率、出血相关死亡和治疗后肝性脑病(PTE)的发生率。将二分类变量的比值比(ORs)与95%置信区间(CI)合并。进行亚组分析。24项研究符合条件,其中包括1120名接受TIPS治疗的受试者和1065名接受ET治疗的受试者。尽管在生存率和PTE方面没有显著差异,但TIPS在降低VRB发生率方面优于ET (OR=0.27;95% ci, 0.19-0.39, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.08
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A modified surgical approach of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer: Report of two cases and literature review. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation: A single-center data analysis. Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring different types of EGFR mutations: A retrospective analysis. Look into hepatic progenitor cell associated trait: Histological heterogeneity of hepatitis B-related combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Knockdown of GRHL3 inhibits activities and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human colorectal cancer cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1