Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Haematologica Pub Date : 2017-10-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-14 DOI:10.3324/haematol.2017.167478
Dennis A Eichenauer, Ingrid Becker, Ina Monsef, Nicholas Chadwick, Vitaliana de Sanctis, Massimo Federico, Catherine Fortpied, Alessandro M Gianni, Michel Henry-Amar, Peter Hoskin, Peter Johnson, Stefano Luminari, Monica Bellei, Alessandro Pulsoni, Matthew R Sydes, Pinuccia Valagussa, Simonetta Viviani, Andreas Engert, Jeremy Franklin
{"title":"Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Dennis A Eichenauer,&nbsp;Ingrid Becker,&nbsp;Ina Monsef,&nbsp;Nicholas Chadwick,&nbsp;Vitaliana de Sanctis,&nbsp;Massimo Federico,&nbsp;Catherine Fortpied,&nbsp;Alessandro M Gianni,&nbsp;Michel Henry-Amar,&nbsp;Peter Hoskin,&nbsp;Peter Johnson,&nbsp;Stefano Luminari,&nbsp;Monica Bellei,&nbsp;Alessandro Pulsoni,&nbsp;Matthew R Sydes,&nbsp;Pinuccia Valagussa,&nbsp;Simonetta Viviani,&nbsp;Andreas Engert,&nbsp;Jeremy Franklin","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2017.167478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment intensification to maximize disease control and reduced intensity approaches to minimize the risk of late sequelae have been evaluated in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. The influence of these interventions on the risk of secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival is reported in the meta-analysis herein, based on individual patient data from 9498 patients treated within 16 randomized controlled trials for newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma between 1984 and 2007. Secondary malignant neoplasms were meta-analyzed using Peto's method as time-to-event outcomes. For progression-free and overall survival, hazard ratios derived from each trial using Cox regression were combined by inverse-variance weighting. Five study questions (combined-modality treatment <i>vs.</i> chemotherapy alone; more extended <i>vs.</i> involved-field radiotherapy; radiation at higher doses <i>vs.</i> radiation at 20 Gy; more <i>vs.</i> fewer cycles of the same chemotherapy protocol; standard-dose chemotherapy <i>vs.</i> intensified chemotherapy) were investigated. After a median follow-up of 7.4 years, dose-intensified chemotherapy resulted in better progression-free survival rates (<i>P</i>=0.007) as compared with standard-dose chemotherapy, but was associated with an increased risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (<i>P</i>=0.0028). No progression-free or overall survival differences were observed between combined-modality treatment and chemotherapy alone, but more secondary malignant neoplasms were seen after combined-modality treatment (<i>P</i>=0.010). For the remaining three study questions, outcomes and secondary malignancy rates did not differ significantly between treatment strategies. The results of this meta-analysis help to weigh up efficacy and secondary malignancy risk for the choice of first-line treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma patients. However, final conclusions regarding secondary solid tumors require longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":"102 10","pages":"1748-1757"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3324/haematol.2017.167478","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.167478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Treatment intensification to maximize disease control and reduced intensity approaches to minimize the risk of late sequelae have been evaluated in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. The influence of these interventions on the risk of secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival is reported in the meta-analysis herein, based on individual patient data from 9498 patients treated within 16 randomized controlled trials for newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma between 1984 and 2007. Secondary malignant neoplasms were meta-analyzed using Peto's method as time-to-event outcomes. For progression-free and overall survival, hazard ratios derived from each trial using Cox regression were combined by inverse-variance weighting. Five study questions (combined-modality treatment vs. chemotherapy alone; more extended vs. involved-field radiotherapy; radiation at higher doses vs. radiation at 20 Gy; more vs. fewer cycles of the same chemotherapy protocol; standard-dose chemotherapy vs. intensified chemotherapy) were investigated. After a median follow-up of 7.4 years, dose-intensified chemotherapy resulted in better progression-free survival rates (P=0.007) as compared with standard-dose chemotherapy, but was associated with an increased risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (P=0.0028). No progression-free or overall survival differences were observed between combined-modality treatment and chemotherapy alone, but more secondary malignant neoplasms were seen after combined-modality treatment (P=0.010). For the remaining three study questions, outcomes and secondary malignancy rates did not differ significantly between treatment strategies. The results of this meta-analysis help to weigh up efficacy and secondary malignancy risk for the choice of first-line treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma patients. However, final conclusions regarding secondary solid tumors require longer follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的继发恶性肿瘤、无进展生存期和总生存期:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
在新诊断的霍奇金淋巴瘤中,已经评估了加强治疗以最大限度地控制疾病和降低治疗强度以最大限度地减少晚期后遗症的风险。本文的荟萃分析报告了这些干预措施对继发性恶性肿瘤风险、无进展生存期和总生存期的影响,该分析基于1984年至2007年间16项随机对照试验中9498名新诊断霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的个体患者数据。继发性恶性肿瘤采用Peto's方法作为时间-事件结局进行meta分析。对于无进展和总生存期,使用Cox回归得出的每个试验的风险比通过反方差加权合并。五个研究问题(联合治疗vs单独化疗;更广泛的放射治疗与受累场放射治疗;高剂量辐射与20 Gy辐射;相同化疗方案的多周期vs少周期;标准剂量化疗与强化化疗)进行了研究。中位随访7.4年后,与标准剂量化疗相比,剂量强化化疗可获得更好的无进展生存率(P=0.007),但与治疗相关的急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征的风险增加相关(P=0.0028)。联合治疗与单纯化疗无进展或总生存期差异,但联合治疗后继发性恶性肿瘤发生率更高(P=0.010)。对于其余三个研究问题,结果和继发恶性肿瘤率在治疗策略之间没有显着差异。本荟萃分析的结果有助于权衡霍奇金淋巴瘤患者选择一线治疗的疗效和继发恶性肿瘤风险。然而,关于继发性实体瘤的最终结论需要更长时间的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Loncastuximab tesirine in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial. Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naïve or relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial. Immune reconstitution dynamics after unrelated allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide compared to classical immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin: a prospective cohort study. Clinical outcomes of three haploidentical transplantation protocols for hematologic malignancies based on data from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry Group. Temporal changes in erythroid progenitors in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1