Comparison of Wear Resistance of Hawley and Vacuum Formed Retainers: An in-vitro Study.

Journal of Dental Biomaterial Pub Date : 2016-06-01
Moshkelgosha V, Shomali M, Momeni M
{"title":"Comparison of Wear Resistance of Hawley and Vacuum Formed Retainers: An in-vitro Study.","authors":"Moshkelgosha V,&nbsp;Shomali M,&nbsp;Momeni M","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>As a physical property, wear resistance of the materials used in the fabrication of orthodontic retainers play a significant role in the stability and long term use of the appliances.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the wear resistance of two commonly used materials for orthodontic retainers: Acropars OP, i.e. a polymethyl methacrylate based material, and 3A-GS060, i.e. a polyethylene based material.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For each material, 30 orthodontic retainers were made according to the manufacturers' instructions and a 30×30×2 mm block was cut out from the mid- palatal area of each retainer. Each specimen underwent 1000 cycles of wear stimulation in a pin on disc machine. The depth of wear of each specimen was measured using a Nano Wizard II atomic force microscope in 3 random points of each specimen's wear trough. The average of these three measurements was calculated and considered as mean value wear depth of each specimen (µm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean wear depth was 6.10µm and 2.15µm for 3A-GS060 and Acropars OP groups respectively. Independent t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The results show Polymethyl methacrylate base (Acropars) is more wear resistance than the polyethylene based material (3A-GS060).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the higher wear resistance of the fabrication material can improve the retainers' survival time and its cost-effectiveness, VFRs should be avoided in situations that the appliance needs high wear resistance such as bite blocks opposing occlusal forces.</p>","PeriodicalId":53341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/5b/JDB-3-248.PMC5608059.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: As a physical property, wear resistance of the materials used in the fabrication of orthodontic retainers play a significant role in the stability and long term use of the appliances.

Objectives: To evaluate the wear resistance of two commonly used materials for orthodontic retainers: Acropars OP, i.e. a polymethyl methacrylate based material, and 3A-GS060, i.e. a polyethylene based material.

Materials and methods: For each material, 30 orthodontic retainers were made according to the manufacturers' instructions and a 30×30×2 mm block was cut out from the mid- palatal area of each retainer. Each specimen underwent 1000 cycles of wear stimulation in a pin on disc machine. The depth of wear of each specimen was measured using a Nano Wizard II atomic force microscope in 3 random points of each specimen's wear trough. The average of these three measurements was calculated and considered as mean value wear depth of each specimen (µm).

Results: The mean wear depth was 6.10µm and 2.15µm for 3A-GS060 and Acropars OP groups respectively. Independent t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). The results show Polymethyl methacrylate base (Acropars) is more wear resistance than the polyethylene based material (3A-GS060).

Conclusions: As the higher wear resistance of the fabrication material can improve the retainers' survival time and its cost-effectiveness, VFRs should be avoided in situations that the appliance needs high wear resistance such as bite blocks opposing occlusal forces.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
霍利固位器与真空成形固位器的耐磨性比较。
问题陈述:正畸固位器材料的耐磨性作为一种物理性质,对矫治器的稳定性和长期使用起着重要的作用。目的:评价正畸固位器常用的两种材料Acropars OP(聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯基材料)和3A-GS060(聚乙烯基材料)的耐磨性。材料和方法:每种材料按照制造商的说明制作30个正畸固位器,并在每个固位器的中腭区切出一个30×30×2 mm的块。每个样品在针盘式机器中进行了1000次磨损刺激。使用纳米向导II原子力显微镜在每个试样的磨损槽的3个随机点上测量每个试样的磨损深度。计算这三个测量值的平均值,作为每个试件的平均磨损深度(µm)。结果:3A-GS060组和Acropars OP组的平均磨损深度分别为6.10µm和2.15µm。独立t检验显示两组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结果表明,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯基材料(Acropars)的耐磨性优于聚乙烯基材料(3A-GS060)。结论:由于制作材料的高耐磨性可以提高固位器的生存时间和成本效益,因此在咬合阻力相反的咬合块等对耐磨性要求较高的情况下,应避免使用vfr。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Colour Stability of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Analysis of Ground Water Fluoride Content and its Association with Prevalence of Fluorosis in Zarand/Kerman: (Using GIS). Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements. Factors Affecting Oral Hygiene and Tooth Brushing in Preschool Children, Shiraz/Iran. Evaluation of Surface Characteristics of Denture Base Using Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Coating: An SEM Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1