Terri Rebmann, Travis M Loux, Daphne Lew, Mary Wakefield
{"title":"Pertussis Vaccination Among Childcare Center Staff, Administrators, and Parents: Uptake, Policies, and Beliefs.","authors":"Terri Rebmann, Travis M Loux, Daphne Lew, Mary Wakefield","doi":"10.1007/s10995-017-2388-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Little is known about childcare staff's and parents' uptake of and attitudes towards pertussis vaccine. Methods Questionnaires were distributed to St. Louis parents and childcare staff in fall, 2014. Parents versus staff and vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals' beliefs regarding pertussis vaccine were compared using chi square tests. Multivariate logistic regressions were run to develop predictive models for staff's and parents' vaccine uptake. Results Overall, 351 parents and staff from 23 agencies participated (response rate = 32%). Parents were more likely than staff to have received pertussis vaccine (66.5 vs. 45.8%, X <sup>2</sup> = 12.5, p < .001). Predictors for staff vaccination included willingness to get vaccinated even if there was a cost (OR 6.6; CI 1.8-24.6; p < .01), awareness of vaccination recommendations (OR 5.2; CI 1.2-22.8; p < .05), and healthcare provider recommendation (OR 4.2; CI 1.2-15.1; p < .05). Parents' predictors of vaccination included perceived importance of vaccination (OR 9.9; CI 4.1-23.8; p < .001), healthcare provider recommendation (OR 4.6; CI 1.7-12.6; p < .01), believing vaccination is effective (OR 4.4; CI 1.1-18.0; p < .05), and knowing where to get vaccine (OR 3.5; CI 1.5-8.1; p < .01). Among unvaccinated staff (n = 52), 74.5% (n = 38) and 70.0% (n = 35) would receive pertussis vaccine if it were offered free of charge and onsite, respectively. Conclusions for Practice Childcare staff's and parents' pertussis vaccine uptake was higher than overall U.S. rates, though significantly lower than the Global Pertussis Initiative target. Implementing an education campaign and providing free vaccine on-site are likely to result in increased vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10995-017-2388-7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2388-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Introduction Little is known about childcare staff's and parents' uptake of and attitudes towards pertussis vaccine. Methods Questionnaires were distributed to St. Louis parents and childcare staff in fall, 2014. Parents versus staff and vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals' beliefs regarding pertussis vaccine were compared using chi square tests. Multivariate logistic regressions were run to develop predictive models for staff's and parents' vaccine uptake. Results Overall, 351 parents and staff from 23 agencies participated (response rate = 32%). Parents were more likely than staff to have received pertussis vaccine (66.5 vs. 45.8%, X 2 = 12.5, p < .001). Predictors for staff vaccination included willingness to get vaccinated even if there was a cost (OR 6.6; CI 1.8-24.6; p < .01), awareness of vaccination recommendations (OR 5.2; CI 1.2-22.8; p < .05), and healthcare provider recommendation (OR 4.2; CI 1.2-15.1; p < .05). Parents' predictors of vaccination included perceived importance of vaccination (OR 9.9; CI 4.1-23.8; p < .001), healthcare provider recommendation (OR 4.6; CI 1.7-12.6; p < .01), believing vaccination is effective (OR 4.4; CI 1.1-18.0; p < .05), and knowing where to get vaccine (OR 3.5; CI 1.5-8.1; p < .01). Among unvaccinated staff (n = 52), 74.5% (n = 38) and 70.0% (n = 35) would receive pertussis vaccine if it were offered free of charge and onsite, respectively. Conclusions for Practice Childcare staff's and parents' pertussis vaccine uptake was higher than overall U.S. rates, though significantly lower than the Global Pertussis Initiative target. Implementing an education campaign and providing free vaccine on-site are likely to result in increased vaccine uptake.
幼儿保育人员和家长对百日咳疫苗的接受情况和态度了解甚少。方法于2014年秋季对圣路易斯市家长和托儿人员进行问卷调查。使用卡方检验比较了家长与工作人员、接种疫苗者与未接种疫苗者对百日咳疫苗的看法。运用多变量logistic回归建立工作人员和家长疫苗接种率的预测模型。结果共有来自23个机构的351名家长和工作人员参与,回复率为32%。父母比工作人员更可能接种百日咳疫苗(66.5%比45.8%,x2 = 12.5, p
期刊介绍:
Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment
Innovative MCH service initiatives
Implementation of MCH programs
MCH policy analysis and advocacy
MCH professional development.
Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology.
Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.