Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Intranasal Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Analgesia in Children with Suspected Extremity Fractures.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-03 DOI:10.1111/acem.13313
Stacy L Reynolds, Kathleen K Bryant, Jonathan R Studnek, Melanie Hogg, Connell Dunn, Megan A Templin, Charity G Moore, James R Young, Katherine Rivera Walker, Michael S Runyon
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Intranasal Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Analgesia in Children with Suspected Extremity Fractures.","authors":"Stacy L Reynolds,&nbsp;Kathleen K Bryant,&nbsp;Jonathan R Studnek,&nbsp;Melanie Hogg,&nbsp;Connell Dunn,&nbsp;Megan A Templin,&nbsp;Charity G Moore,&nbsp;James R Young,&nbsp;Katherine Rivera Walker,&nbsp;Michael S Runyon","doi":"10.1111/acem.13313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the tolerability and efficacy of intranasal subdissociative ketamine to intranasal fentanyl for analgesia of children with acute traumatic pain and investigated the feasibility of a larger noninferiority trial that could investigate the potential opioid-sparing effects of intranasal ketamine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial compared 1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine to 1.5 μg/kg intranasal fentanyl in children 4 to 17 years old with acute pain from suspected isolated extremity fractures presenting to an urban Level II pediatric trauma center from December 2015 to November 2016. Patients, parents, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome, a tolerability measure, was the frequency of cumulative side effects and adverse events within 60 minutes of drug administration. The secondary outcomes included the difference in mean pain score reduction at 20 minutes, the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant reduction in pain in 20 minutes, total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour (excluding study drug) required during the emergency department (ED) stay, and the feasibility of enrolling children presenting to the ED in acute pain into a randomized trial conducted under U.S. regulations. All patients were monitored until 6 hours after their last dose of study drug or until admission to the hospital ward or operating room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 629 patients screened, 87 received the study drug and 82 had complete data for the primary outcome (41 patients in each group). The median (interquartile range) age was 8 (6-11) years and 62% were male. Baseline pain scores were similar among patients randomized to receive ketamine (73 ± 26) and fentanyl (69 ± 26; mean difference [95% CI] = 4 [-7 to 15]). The cumulative number of side effects was 2.2 times higher in the ketamine group, but there were no serious adverse events and no patients in either group required intervention. The most common side effects of ketamine were bad taste in the mouth (37; 90.2%), dizziness (30; 73.2%), and sleepiness (19; 46.3%). The most common side effects of fentanyl were sleepiness (15; 36.6%), bad taste in the mouth (9; 22%), and itchy nose (9; 22%). No patients experienced respiratory side effects. At 20 minutes, the mean pain scale score reduction was 44 ± 36 for ketamine and 35 ± 29 for fentanyl (mean difference = 9 [95% CI = -4 to 23]). Procedural sedation with ketamine occurred in 28 ketamine patients (65%) and 25 fentanyl patients (57%) prior to completing the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intranasal ketamine was associated with more minor side effects than intranasal fentanyl. Pain relief at 20 minutes was similar between groups. Our data support the feasibility of a larger, noninferiority trial to more rigorously evaluate the safety, efficacy, and potential opioid-sparing benefits of intranasal ketamine analgesia for children with acute pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 12","pages":"1430-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/acem.13313","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Objectives: We compared the tolerability and efficacy of intranasal subdissociative ketamine to intranasal fentanyl for analgesia of children with acute traumatic pain and investigated the feasibility of a larger noninferiority trial that could investigate the potential opioid-sparing effects of intranasal ketamine.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial compared 1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine to 1.5 μg/kg intranasal fentanyl in children 4 to 17 years old with acute pain from suspected isolated extremity fractures presenting to an urban Level II pediatric trauma center from December 2015 to November 2016. Patients, parents, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome, a tolerability measure, was the frequency of cumulative side effects and adverse events within 60 minutes of drug administration. The secondary outcomes included the difference in mean pain score reduction at 20 minutes, the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant reduction in pain in 20 minutes, total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour (excluding study drug) required during the emergency department (ED) stay, and the feasibility of enrolling children presenting to the ED in acute pain into a randomized trial conducted under U.S. regulations. All patients were monitored until 6 hours after their last dose of study drug or until admission to the hospital ward or operating room.

Results: Of 629 patients screened, 87 received the study drug and 82 had complete data for the primary outcome (41 patients in each group). The median (interquartile range) age was 8 (6-11) years and 62% were male. Baseline pain scores were similar among patients randomized to receive ketamine (73 ± 26) and fentanyl (69 ± 26; mean difference [95% CI] = 4 [-7 to 15]). The cumulative number of side effects was 2.2 times higher in the ketamine group, but there were no serious adverse events and no patients in either group required intervention. The most common side effects of ketamine were bad taste in the mouth (37; 90.2%), dizziness (30; 73.2%), and sleepiness (19; 46.3%). The most common side effects of fentanyl were sleepiness (15; 36.6%), bad taste in the mouth (9; 22%), and itchy nose (9; 22%). No patients experienced respiratory side effects. At 20 minutes, the mean pain scale score reduction was 44 ± 36 for ketamine and 35 ± 29 for fentanyl (mean difference = 9 [95% CI = -4 to 23]). Procedural sedation with ketamine occurred in 28 ketamine patients (65%) and 25 fentanyl patients (57%) prior to completing the study.

Conclusions: Intranasal ketamine was associated with more minor side effects than intranasal fentanyl. Pain relief at 20 minutes was similar between groups. Our data support the feasibility of a larger, noninferiority trial to more rigorously evaluate the safety, efficacy, and potential opioid-sparing benefits of intranasal ketamine analgesia for children with acute pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯胺酮鼻内与芬太尼鼻内用于疑似四肢骨折患儿镇痛的随机对照可行性试验。
目的:我们比较了鼻内亚解离性氯胺酮与鼻内芬太尼用于急性创伤性疼痛儿童镇痛的耐受性和疗效,并研究了一项更大规模的非劣效性试验的可行性,该试验可以研究鼻内氯胺酮的潜在阿片类药物节约作用。方法:本随机对照试验比较了2015年12月至2016年11月在城市二级儿科创伤中心就诊的4至17岁疑似孤立性四肢骨折急性疼痛患儿鼻内1 mg/kg氯胺酮与1.5 μg/kg芬太尼的差异。患者、家长、治疗医生和结果评估者对分组分配不知情。主要结局,耐受性测量,是药物给药后60分钟内累积副作用和不良事件的频率。次要结局包括20分钟时平均疼痛评分减轻的差异、20分钟内达到临床显著疼痛减轻的患者比例、急诊科(ED)住院期间所需的阿片类止痛药总剂量(吗啡当量/kg/小时)(不包括研究药物),以及将急性疼痛就诊ED的儿童纳入根据美国法规进行的随机试验的可行性。所有患者在服用最后一剂研究药物后6小时或进入医院病房或手术室前均接受监测。结果:在筛选的629例患者中,87例接受了研究药物,82例具有完整的主要结局数据(每组41例)。年龄中位数(四分位数间距)为8岁(6-11岁),62%为男性。基线疼痛评分在随机接受氯胺酮(73±26)和芬太尼(69±26)的患者中相似;平均差异[95% CI] = 4[-7至15])。氯胺酮组的累积副作用数是氯胺酮组的2.2倍,但没有出现严重不良事件,两组患者均无需干预。氯胺酮最常见的副作用是口腔异味(37;90.2%),头晕(30;73.2%),嗜睡(19;46.3%)。芬太尼最常见的副作用是嗜睡(15;36.6%),口腔异味(9;22%),鼻子发痒(9%;22%)。没有患者出现呼吸系统副作用。在20分钟时,氯胺酮组的平均疼痛评分减少44±36分,芬太尼组的平均疼痛评分减少35±29分(平均差异= 9 [95% CI = -4至23])。在完成研究之前,28例氯胺酮患者(65%)和25例芬太尼患者(57%)使用氯胺酮进行程序性镇静。结论:氯胺酮鼻喷比芬太尼鼻喷更轻微的副作用。20分钟疼痛缓解在两组之间相似。我们的数据支持一项更大规模的非劣效性试验的可行性,以更严格地评估氯胺酮鼻内镇痛对急性疼痛儿童的安全性、有效性和潜在的阿片类药物节约益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing geriatric trauma mortality prediction: Modifying and assessing the geriatric trauma outcome score with net benefit and decision curve analysis. The moral injury of zeeple-zoople. Current use of push-dose epinephrine: Survey and interview results from academic clinicians in emergency medicine. Fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin versus adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism treatment. Clinician-level variation in admission practices for common conditions in Veteran Affairs emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1