Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on grip force control in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

Q3 Medicine Cerebellum and Ataxias Pub Date : 2017-09-15 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40673-017-0072-8
Liane John, Michael Küper, Thomas Hulst, Dagmar Timmann, Joachim Hermsdörfer
{"title":"Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on grip force control in patients with cerebellar degeneration.","authors":"Liane John,&nbsp;Michael Küper,&nbsp;Thomas Hulst,&nbsp;Dagmar Timmann,&nbsp;Joachim Hermsdörfer","doi":"10.1186/s40673-017-0072-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The control of grip forces when moving a hand held object is impaired in patients with cerebellar degeneration. We asked the question whether after-effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the lateral cerebellum or M1 improved grip force control in cerebellar patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Grip force control while holding an object during cyclic arm movements was assessed in patients with pure cerebellar degeneration (<i>n</i> = 14, mean age 50.2 years ± SD 8.8 years) and age- and sex-matched control participants (n = 14, mean age 50.7 years ± SD 9.8 years). All subjects were tested before and after application of tDCS (2 mA, 22 min) in a within-subject design. Each subject received anodal tDCS applied to the cerebellum, anodal tDCS applied to M1 or sham-stimulation with a break of 1 week between the three experimental sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no clear after-effects of tDCS on grip force control neither in control participants nor in cerebellar patients. Cerebellar patients showed typical impairments with higher grip forces, a higher variability of movements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present study, deficits in grip force control were neither improved by tDCS applied over the cerebellum nor M1 in cerebellar degeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":36752,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum and Ataxias","volume":"4 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40673-017-0072-8","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum and Ataxias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40673-017-0072-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: The control of grip forces when moving a hand held object is impaired in patients with cerebellar degeneration. We asked the question whether after-effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the lateral cerebellum or M1 improved grip force control in cerebellar patients.

Methods: Grip force control while holding an object during cyclic arm movements was assessed in patients with pure cerebellar degeneration (n = 14, mean age 50.2 years ± SD 8.8 years) and age- and sex-matched control participants (n = 14, mean age 50.7 years ± SD 9.8 years). All subjects were tested before and after application of tDCS (2 mA, 22 min) in a within-subject design. Each subject received anodal tDCS applied to the cerebellum, anodal tDCS applied to M1 or sham-stimulation with a break of 1 week between the three experimental sessions.

Results: There were no clear after-effects of tDCS on grip force control neither in control participants nor in cerebellar patients. Cerebellar patients showed typical impairments with higher grip forces, a higher variability of movements.

Conclusion: In the present study, deficits in grip force control were neither improved by tDCS applied over the cerebellum nor M1 in cerebellar degeneration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅直流电刺激对小脑变性患者握力控制的影响。
背景:小脑变性患者在移动手持物体时握力的控制能力受损。我们提出了一个问题,即应用于小脑外侧或M1的阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的后效是否改善了小脑患者的握力控制。方法:评估单纯小脑变性患者(n = 14,平均年龄50.2岁±SD 8.8岁)和年龄和性别匹配的对照组(n = 14,平均年龄50.7岁±SD 9.8岁)在手臂循环运动中握住物体时的握力控制。在受试者内设计中,所有受试者在使用tDCS (2 mA, 22 min)前后进行测试。每个受试者分别接受小脑负极tDCS、M1负极tDCS或假刺激,三个实验阶段之间休息1周。结果:tDCS对对照组和小脑患者握力控制均无明显后效。小脑患者表现出典型的握力较强、运动变异性较大的损伤。结论:在本研究中,tDCS对小脑和M1在小脑变性中的握力控制缺陷并没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebellum and Ataxias
Cerebellum and Ataxias Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rare occurrence of severe blindness and deafness in Friedreich ataxia: a case report. Recognition and management of rapid-onset gluten ataxias: case series. Relationships between motor scores and cognitive functioning in FMR1 female premutation X carriers indicate early involvement of cerebello-cerebral pathways. Anti-Tr/DNER antibody paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration preceding a very late relapse of Hodgkin Lymphoma after 12 years. The cerebellum-driven social basis of mathematics: implications for one-on-one tutoring of children with mathematics learning disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1