From royal wet nurses to Facebook: The evolution of breastmilk sharing.

Q2 Nursing Breastfeeding Review Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Kelley L Baumgartel, Larissa Sneeringer, Susan M Cohen
{"title":"From royal wet nurses to Facebook: The evolution of breastmilk sharing.","authors":"Kelley L Baumgartel,&nbsp;Larissa Sneeringer,&nbsp;Susan M Cohen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wet-nursing was an essential practice that allowed for infant survival after many mothers died in childbirth. The story of wet-nursing is complicated by both religious pressures and cultural expectations of women. It is likely that these historical practices have shaped our current social, political and legislative environments regarding breastfeeding. The aim of this article is to provide a historical perspective on the practice of wet-nursing, with a focus on: 1) social views of wet nurses, 2) breastmilk evaluation and 3) the ideal wet nurse. Historical perspectives from Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece and Rome, 19th and 20th century America and current practices are examined. An appreciation for the evolution of breastmilk sharing provides clinicians and lactation advocates with the historical origins which provided the template for current practice as it relates to donor milk, breastfeeding culture and relevant legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35568,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Review","volume":"24 3","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603296/pdf/nihms860019.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wet-nursing was an essential practice that allowed for infant survival after many mothers died in childbirth. The story of wet-nursing is complicated by both religious pressures and cultural expectations of women. It is likely that these historical practices have shaped our current social, political and legislative environments regarding breastfeeding. The aim of this article is to provide a historical perspective on the practice of wet-nursing, with a focus on: 1) social views of wet nurses, 2) breastmilk evaluation and 3) the ideal wet nurse. Historical perspectives from Ancient Egypt, Ancient Greece and Rome, 19th and 20th century America and current practices are examined. An appreciation for the evolution of breastmilk sharing provides clinicians and lactation advocates with the historical origins which provided the template for current practice as it relates to donor milk, breastfeeding culture and relevant legislation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从皇家奶妈到Facebook:母乳分享的演变。
在许多母亲死于分娩后,母乳喂养是一种重要的做法,可以使婴儿存活下来。由于宗教压力和对女性的文化期望,母乳喂养的故事变得复杂起来。这些历史上的做法很可能塑造了我们目前关于母乳喂养的社会、政治和立法环境。本文的目的是提供一个历史的观点,奶妈的做法,重点是:1)奶妈的社会观点,2)母乳评价和3)理想的奶妈。从古埃及,古希腊和罗马,19世纪和20世纪的美国和当前的做法的历史观点进行了审查。了解母乳分享的演变为临床医生和哺乳倡导者提供了历史起源,为当前的实践提供了模板,因为它涉及供体母乳、母乳喂养文化和相关立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Review
Breastfeeding Review Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three experienced lactation consultants reflect upon the oral tie phenomenon. Breastfeeding policy: The foundation for improving Australia's health. Perspectives of key stakeholders and experts in infant feeding on the implementation of the Australian National Breastfeeding Strategy 2010-2015. New Zealand women talk about breastfeeding support from male family members. Bringing babies and breasts into workplaces: Support for breastfeeding mothers in workplaces and childcare services at the Australian National University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1