Differences between completely physically inactive and low active older men and their response to an exercise intervention: the Veterans LIFE study.

Healthy aging research Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-09-07 DOI:10.12715/har.2015.4.36
Matthew J Peterson, Carl F Pieper, Richard Sloane, Gail M Crowley, Patricia A Cowper, Eleanor S McConnell, Hayden B Bosworth, Carola C Ekelund, Megan P Pearson, Katherine S Hall, Miriam C Morey
{"title":"Differences between completely physically inactive and low active older men and their response to an exercise intervention: the Veterans LIFE study.","authors":"Matthew J Peterson, Carl F Pieper, Richard Sloane, Gail M Crowley, Patricia A Cowper, Eleanor S McConnell, Hayden B Bosworth, Carola C Ekelund, Megan P Pearson, Katherine S Hall, Miriam C Morey","doi":"10.12715/har.2015.4.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity interventions typically do not report behavioral changes in activity sub-groups. The aim of this study was to compare baseline differences and changes in physical activity between truly physically inactive men and low active men enrolled in a twelve-month, home-based physical activity intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Veterans with a mean age of 77.6 years were randomized to either a physical activity intervention or usual care. Measures included self-reported physical activity, physical function, and physical performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the physically inactive group reported more symptoms and poorer functioning than the low active group. At 12 months, physically inactive men randomized to the intervention group increased their physical activity to an average of 73.3 minutes per week. Physically inactive individuals randomized to the control group were eight times more likely to remain inactive compared to the low active group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Completely physically inactive older men can markedly increase physical activity levels with a long-term intervention. Without such intervention, the likelihood of this group remaining inactive is eightfold.</p>","PeriodicalId":90841,"journal":{"name":"Healthy aging research","volume":"4 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12715/har.2015.4.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity interventions typically do not report behavioral changes in activity sub-groups. The aim of this study was to compare baseline differences and changes in physical activity between truly physically inactive men and low active men enrolled in a twelve-month, home-based physical activity intervention.

Methods: Veterans with a mean age of 77.6 years were randomized to either a physical activity intervention or usual care. Measures included self-reported physical activity, physical function, and physical performance.

Results: At baseline, the physically inactive group reported more symptoms and poorer functioning than the low active group. At 12 months, physically inactive men randomized to the intervention group increased their physical activity to an average of 73.3 minutes per week. Physically inactive individuals randomized to the control group were eight times more likely to remain inactive compared to the low active group.

Conclusions: Completely physically inactive older men can markedly increase physical activity levels with a long-term intervention. Without such intervention, the likelihood of this group remaining inactive is eightfold.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完全不运动和低运动量老年男性之间的差异及其对运动干预的反应:退伍军人 LIFE 研究。
背景:体力活动干预通常不会报告活动亚组的行为变化。本研究的目的是比较参加为期 12 个月的家庭体育锻炼干预的真正缺乏体育锻炼的男性和缺乏体育锻炼的男性在体育锻炼方面的基线差异和变化:方法:平均年龄为 77.6 岁的退伍军人被随机分配到体育锻炼干预或常规护理中。测量指标包括自我报告的体力活动、身体功能和体能表现:结果:基线时,不参加体育锻炼组比不参加体育锻炼组报告的症状更多,功能更差。12 个月后,被随机分配到干预组的非运动男性的运动量增加到平均每周 73.3 分钟。与低活动量组相比,被随机分配到对照组的不运动者保持不运动的可能性要高出八倍:结论:完全不运动的老年男性可以通过长期干预显著提高运动水平。结论:完全不参加体育活动的老年男性可以通过长期干预显著提高体育活动水平,如果不采取这种干预措施,该群体继续不参加体育活动的可能性会增加八倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effect of entonox gas and aromatherapy with lavender on the severity of labor pain Life without professional work-perceptions about one’s self, interpersonal relations and social life after retirement Prevalence of obesity and overweight among office workers of pars special economic energy zone, Assaluyeh, Iran Predictive value of SYNTAX score on in-hospital outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Study of Cardiovascular Factors, Quality of Life and Body Composition in Physically Active and Sedentary Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1