Adverse Reactions of Antibody-Therapy for Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas: Rituximab, Brentuximab Vedotin, Alemtuzumab, and Mogamulizumab.

Current problems in dermatology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-07 DOI:10.1159/000478079
I Saulite, E Guenova, W Hoetzenecker
{"title":"Adverse Reactions of Antibody-Therapy for Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas: Rituximab, Brentuximab Vedotin, Alemtuzumab, and Mogamulizumab.","authors":"I Saulite,&nbsp;E Guenova,&nbsp;W Hoetzenecker","doi":"10.1159/000478079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of advanced PCLs is limited and rarely reaches complete remission despite aggressive treatment modalities, such as polychemotherapy with various adverse effects. However, several monoclonal antibodies drug agents in patients with advanced primary cutaneous lymphomas demonstrate promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles. The monoclonal antibodies drug agents have favourable tolerability compared with multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, adverse effects manifest with a broad clinical spectrum, hence the markers of targeted therapies are not limited to tumour cells but found on tumour cells and also on benign T and/or B cells. Moreover, the safety profile and direct causal association of drug and adverse effects should be interpreted with caution because many of the patients in clinical studies have received multiple treatments. Here, we focus on the safety profile of mAbs therapies that have recently been approved or are currently under preclinical or clinical investigation for CBCLs (rituximab) and CTCLs (brentuximab, mogamulizumab, and alemtuzumab). Further studies to define clinical safety profile in the patient cohort with cutaneous lymphomas are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11010,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in dermatology","volume":"53 ","pages":"70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000478079","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000478079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Treatment of advanced PCLs is limited and rarely reaches complete remission despite aggressive treatment modalities, such as polychemotherapy with various adverse effects. However, several monoclonal antibodies drug agents in patients with advanced primary cutaneous lymphomas demonstrate promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles. The monoclonal antibodies drug agents have favourable tolerability compared with multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, adverse effects manifest with a broad clinical spectrum, hence the markers of targeted therapies are not limited to tumour cells but found on tumour cells and also on benign T and/or B cells. Moreover, the safety profile and direct causal association of drug and adverse effects should be interpreted with caution because many of the patients in clinical studies have received multiple treatments. Here, we focus on the safety profile of mAbs therapies that have recently been approved or are currently under preclinical or clinical investigation for CBCLs (rituximab) and CTCLs (brentuximab, mogamulizumab, and alemtuzumab). Further studies to define clinical safety profile in the patient cohort with cutaneous lymphomas are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗体治疗原发性皮肤淋巴瘤的不良反应:利妥昔单抗、布伦妥昔单抗、阿仑单抗和莫gamulizumab。
晚期pcl的治疗是有限的,很少达到完全缓解,尽管积极的治疗方式,如多种不良反应的化疗。然而,一些单克隆抗体药物在晚期原发性皮肤淋巴瘤患者中显示出良好的疗效和可控的安全性。与多药细胞毒化疗相比,单克隆抗体药物具有良好的耐受性。然而,不良反应在广泛的临床范围内表现出来,因此靶向治疗的标志物不仅限于肿瘤细胞,还可以在肿瘤细胞和良性T细胞和/或B细胞上发现。此外,由于临床研究中的许多患者接受了多种治疗,因此应谨慎解释药物的安全性和药物与不良反应的直接因果关系。在这里,我们重点关注最近被批准或目前正在进行CBCLs(利妥昔单抗)和CTCLs (brentuximab, mogamulizumab和alemtuzumab)临床前或临床研究的单克隆抗体疗法的安全性。需要进一步的研究来确定皮肤淋巴瘤患者队列的临床安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auxiliary Utensils in Cosmetic and Medical Tattoo Settings. Static and Dynamic Anatomy of the Face, in Particular Eyebrows, Eyelids and Lips. Stretch Mark Treatment by Tattooing and Microneedling. On the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Face Masks, Gloves, and Disinfectants to Prevent Transfer of Microbials between the Tattooist and the Customer: A Practical Review of Pros and Cons Including the Occupational Safety of the Tattooist. Microblading Technique for Tattooing of "Hairstrokes" That Simulate Natural Hair: Eyebrow Tattooing and Correction of Medical Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1