Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.

Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Pub Date : 2016-01-12 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.17096/jiufd.02142
Seyda Ersahan, Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu
{"title":"Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.","authors":"Seyda Ersahan,&nbsp;Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu","doi":"10.17096/jiufd.02142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of different methods of surface treatment on enamel roughness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) according to type of enamel surface treatment: I, acid etching; II, Er:YAG laser; III, Nd:YAG laser. The surface roughness of enamel was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer. For each enamel sample, two readings were taken across the sample-before enamel surface treatment (T1) and after enamel surface treatment (T2). The roughness parameter analyzed was the average roughness (Ra). Statistical analysis was performed using a Paired sample t test and the post-hoc Mann- Whitney U test, with the significance level set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest Ra (average roughness) values were observed for Group II, with a significant difference with Groups I and III (P<0.001). Ra values for the acid etching group (Group I) were significantly lower than other groups (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surface treatment of enamel with Er:YAG laser and Nd:YAG laser results in significantly higher Ra than acid-etching. Both Er:YAG laser or Nd:YAG laser can be recommended as viable treatment alternatives to acid etching.</p>","PeriodicalId":30947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry","volume":"50 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17096/jiufd.02142","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.02142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of different methods of surface treatment on enamel roughness.

Materials and methods: Ninety human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) according to type of enamel surface treatment: I, acid etching; II, Er:YAG laser; III, Nd:YAG laser. The surface roughness of enamel was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer. For each enamel sample, two readings were taken across the sample-before enamel surface treatment (T1) and after enamel surface treatment (T2). The roughness parameter analyzed was the average roughness (Ra). Statistical analysis was performed using a Paired sample t test and the post-hoc Mann- Whitney U test, with the significance level set at 0.05.

Results: The highest Ra (average roughness) values were observed for Group II, with a significant difference with Groups I and III (P<0.001). Ra values for the acid etching group (Group I) were significantly lower than other groups (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Surface treatment of enamel with Er:YAG laser and Nd:YAG laser results in significantly higher Ra than acid-etching. Both Er:YAG laser or Nd:YAG laser can be recommended as viable treatment alternatives to acid etching.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面处理对牙釉质表面粗糙度的影响。
目的:比较不同表面处理方法对牙釉质粗糙度的影响。材料与方法:90颗人上颌第一前磨牙按牙釉质表面处理方式随机分为3组(n=30): 1、酸蚀组;二、Er:YAG激光器;三、Nd:YAG激光器。采用非接触式光学轮廓仪测量牙釉质表面粗糙度。对于每个牙釉质样品,在牙釉质表面处理前(T1)和牙釉质表面处理后(T2)对样品进行两次读数。分析的粗糙度参数为平均粗糙度(Ra)。统计学分析采用配对样本t检验和事后Mann- Whitney U检验,显著性水平设为0.05。结果:ⅱ组Ra(平均粗糙度)值最高,与ⅰ组和ⅲ组差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:Er:YAG激光和Nd:YAG激光表面处理的Ra明显高于酸蚀。Er:YAG激光或Nd:YAG激光都可以推荐作为酸蚀刻的可行治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electro-surgical management of a traumatic fibroma with clinical assessment of re-epithelialization using methylene blue assay: A clinico-histopathological case report. Does coparenting improve during the OurRelationship program? Explorations within a low-income sample during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some historical musings on tooth/root resorption. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. Thermo-cured glass ionomer cements in restorative dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1