Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain to a Base-Metal Compared to Zirconia Core.

Journal of Dental Biomaterial Pub Date : 2017-03-01
S M Abrisham, A Fallah Tafti, S Kheirkhah, M A Tavakkoli
{"title":"Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain to a Base-Metal Compared to Zirconia Core.","authors":"S M Abrisham,&nbsp;A Fallah Tafti,&nbsp;S Kheirkhah,&nbsp;M A Tavakkoli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Recent clinical results for Zirconia all-ceramic restorations have revealed that the fracture rate 6-15% of the Zirconia framework is so low and the core of Zirconia has high stability. However, chipping-off fractures of porcelain are the most common reason for failures of Zirconia in the fixed partial dentures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of porcelain in the porcelain fused to metal and all-ceramic crowns with Zirconia core.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two groups were selected: porcelain fused to metal (PFM) and porcelain fused to Zirconia (PFZ) (n = 30).In the PFM group, a wax model (10 × 10 × 10mm)was used to cast metal base (Ni_Cr alloy). In the PFZ group, an acrylic cubic model (10 × 10 × 10mm) was made as Zirconia model for scanning.15 cubic Zirconia samples were milled by CAD-CAM. The procedure of porcelain veneering was conducted by the conventional layering technique up to 2 mm thickness (2.5 × 2.5 × 2 mm). All specimens were stored in water for 48 hrs. Thermal cycling was conducted for 20000 cycles between 55°C and 5ºC alternatively for 30s.All samples were mounted in acrylic resin and the SBS test was performed, using a universal testing machine. The analysis of data was performed at a significance level of 0.05 using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney U-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean of SBS in PFM and PFZ was 24.57 and 20.88, respectively. The results of Mann-Whitney test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of porcelain fused to metal and Zirconia in item shear bond strength (<i>p</i> = 0.455).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups of PFM and PFZ in the item SBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":53341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/b9/JDB-4-367.PMC5608052.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Recent clinical results for Zirconia all-ceramic restorations have revealed that the fracture rate 6-15% of the Zirconia framework is so low and the core of Zirconia has high stability. However, chipping-off fractures of porcelain are the most common reason for failures of Zirconia in the fixed partial dentures.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of porcelain in the porcelain fused to metal and all-ceramic crowns with Zirconia core.

Materials and methods: Two groups were selected: porcelain fused to metal (PFM) and porcelain fused to Zirconia (PFZ) (n = 30).In the PFM group, a wax model (10 × 10 × 10mm)was used to cast metal base (Ni_Cr alloy). In the PFZ group, an acrylic cubic model (10 × 10 × 10mm) was made as Zirconia model for scanning.15 cubic Zirconia samples were milled by CAD-CAM. The procedure of porcelain veneering was conducted by the conventional layering technique up to 2 mm thickness (2.5 × 2.5 × 2 mm). All specimens were stored in water for 48 hrs. Thermal cycling was conducted for 20000 cycles between 55°C and 5ºC alternatively for 30s.All samples were mounted in acrylic resin and the SBS test was performed, using a universal testing machine. The analysis of data was performed at a significance level of 0.05 using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: Mean of SBS in PFM and PFZ was 24.57 and 20.88, respectively. The results of Mann-Whitney test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of porcelain fused to metal and Zirconia in item shear bond strength (p = 0.455).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the two groups of PFM and PFZ in the item SBS.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与氧化锆芯相比,陶瓷与基本金属的剪切结合强度。
问题陈述:最近的临床结果表明,氧化锆全瓷修复体的框架骨折率为6-15%,氧化锆核具有很高的稳定性。然而,瓷的脱落性断裂是固定部分义齿中氧化锆修复失败最常见的原因。目的:比较氧化锆全瓷冠与金属瓷冠的剪切结合强度(SBS)。材料与方法:选择金属烤瓷(PFM)和氧化锆烤瓷(PFZ)两组(n = 30)。PFM组采用10 × 10 × 10mm的蜡模铸造金属基体(Ni_Cr合金)。PFZ组采用10 × 10 × 10mm的丙烯酸立方模型作为氧化锆模型进行扫描。采用CAD-CAM对15立方氧化锆试样进行铣削。采用传统的贴面工艺,贴面厚度为2mm (2.5 × 2.5 × 2mm)。所有标本在水中保存48小时。在55°C和5°C之间交替进行30秒的热循环,循环20000次。所有样品均装在丙烯酸树脂中,并使用通用试验机进行SBS测试。数据分析采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov和Mann-Whitney u检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:PFM组和PFZ组的SBS平均值分别为24.57和20.88。Mann-Whitney检验结果显示,金属瓷与氧化锆两组的项目剪切粘结强度差异无统计学意义(p = 0.455)。结论:PFM和PFZ两组在SBS项目上无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Colour Stability of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Analysis of Ground Water Fluoride Content and its Association with Prevalence of Fluorosis in Zarand/Kerman: (Using GIS). Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements. Factors Affecting Oral Hygiene and Tooth Brushing in Preschool Children, Shiraz/Iran. Evaluation of Surface Characteristics of Denture Base Using Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Coating: An SEM Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1