HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 haplotypes frequency and diagnostic utility in celiac disease patients of Gaza strip, Palestine.

Q1 Medicine Auto-Immunity Highlights Pub Date : 2017-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s13317-017-0099-0
Basim M Ayesh, Eman Kh Zaqout, Maged M Yassin
{"title":"HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 haplotypes frequency and diagnostic utility in celiac disease patients of Gaza strip, Palestine.","authors":"Basim M Ayesh,&nbsp;Eman Kh Zaqout,&nbsp;Maged M Yassin","doi":"10.1007/s13317-017-0099-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Celiac disease (CD) diagnosis can be established by serological and small bowel biopsy (SBB), while absence of HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 haplotypes excludes the disease. The present study aims at evaluating the diagnosis of a representative sample of pediatric and adult CD patients of Gaza strip in light of DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes expression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unrelated CD patients (n = 101) and matched healthy controls (n = 97) were genotyped for DQA1*05, DQB1*02 and DQB1*03:02 alleles by allele-specific real-time PCR. The diagnosis was re-evaluated according to the patient laboratory tests and HLA-DQ genotype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnosis of 35 patients who have been managed for CD could not be confirmed. Twenty-five of them were diagnosed upon their clinical presentation only. The remaining were either negative for serological and SBB tests or negative for HLA-DQ haplotypes. The HLA-DQ alleles were negative in 4 SBB and one Anti-EMA positive patients. The frequency of DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes among the remaining 65 confirmed cases was 70.8 and 15.4%, respectively, compared to 17.5 and 27.8% in the controls. The DQB1*02 allele was the most common in the cases (84.6%) followed by DQA1*05 allele (80%) and DQB1*03:02 allele (20%). The DQA1*05 allele was commonest in the control group (54.6%) followed by DQB1*02 allele (42.3%) and DQB1*03:02 allele (28.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absence of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genotyping in the workup of patients may result in CD misdiagnosis, particularly in a setting with poor histopathological diagnostic capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8655,"journal":{"name":"Auto-Immunity Highlights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13317-017-0099-0","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auto-Immunity Highlights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-017-0099-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose: Celiac disease (CD) diagnosis can be established by serological and small bowel biopsy (SBB), while absence of HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 haplotypes excludes the disease. The present study aims at evaluating the diagnosis of a representative sample of pediatric and adult CD patients of Gaza strip in light of DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes expression.

Methods: Unrelated CD patients (n = 101) and matched healthy controls (n = 97) were genotyped for DQA1*05, DQB1*02 and DQB1*03:02 alleles by allele-specific real-time PCR. The diagnosis was re-evaluated according to the patient laboratory tests and HLA-DQ genotype.

Results: The diagnosis of 35 patients who have been managed for CD could not be confirmed. Twenty-five of them were diagnosed upon their clinical presentation only. The remaining were either negative for serological and SBB tests or negative for HLA-DQ haplotypes. The HLA-DQ alleles were negative in 4 SBB and one Anti-EMA positive patients. The frequency of DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes among the remaining 65 confirmed cases was 70.8 and 15.4%, respectively, compared to 17.5 and 27.8% in the controls. The DQB1*02 allele was the most common in the cases (84.6%) followed by DQA1*05 allele (80%) and DQB1*03:02 allele (20%). The DQA1*05 allele was commonest in the control group (54.6%) followed by DQB1*02 allele (42.3%) and DQB1*03:02 allele (28.9%).

Conclusions: Absence of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genotyping in the workup of patients may result in CD misdiagnosis, particularly in a setting with poor histopathological diagnostic capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HLA-DQ2和-DQ8单倍型在巴勒斯坦加沙地带乳糜泻患者中的频率和诊断价值
目的:乳糜泻(CD)的诊断可以通过血清学和小肠活检(SBB)来确定,而缺乏HLA-DQ2和-DQ8单倍型则排除该疾病。本研究旨在利用DQ2和DQ8单倍型表达评估加沙地带儿童和成人CD患者的代表性样本的诊断。方法:采用等位基因特异性实时PCR方法,对101例非相关CD患者和97例健康对照进行DQA1*05、DQB1*02和DQB1*03:02等位基因分型。根据患者实验室检查和HLA-DQ基因型重新评估诊断。结果:35例经诊治的乳糜泻患者诊断不明确。其中25例仅根据临床表现确诊。其余的人要么血清学和SBB试验阴性,要么HLA-DQ单倍型阴性。4例SBB和1例Anti-EMA阳性患者HLA-DQ等位基因为阴性。在其余65例确诊病例中,DQ2和DQ8单倍型的频率分别为70.8%和15.4%,而对照组为17.5%和27.8%。DQB1*02等位基因最多(84.6%),其次是DQA1*05等位基因(80%)和DQB1*03:02等位基因(20%)。对照组中DQA1*05等位基因最多(54.6%),其次是DQB1*02等位基因(42.3%)和DQB1*03:02等位基因(28.9%)。结论:在患者体检中缺少HLA-DQ2和HLA-DQ8基因分型可能导致CD误诊,特别是在组织病理学诊断能力差的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential clinical biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis with an omic approach. Effect of janus kinase inhibitors and methotrexate combination on malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Short-chain fatty acids and intestinal inflammation in multiple sclerosis: modulation of female susceptibility by microbial products? Endogenous mitochondrial double-stranded RNA is not an activator of the type I interferon response in human pancreatic beta cells. Sustained clinical remission under infliximab/rituximab combination therapy in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1