{"title":"Improving operating room productivity and efficiency - are there any simple strategies?","authors":"Anthony J Cunningham","doi":"10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.cnn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rising costs and diminishing reimbursements require hospitals to continually find ways to improve efficiency and productivity. The operating room (OR) is a costintensive environment requiring efficient and effective management. The power of performance of the OR is crucially dependent on the cooperation of the surgical, anaesthesia, nursing and allied health professionals involved. Dr O’Donnell and colleagues from the Department of Anaesthesia, Cork University Hospital, Ireland studied the effects of a number of work practice changes, including modification of patient processing and additional manpower, on non-operating time, number of cases performed and patient cancellations in a dedicated soft-tissue trauma surgical unit [1]. Work practice changes included a transition from sequential patient processing to parallel patient processing and increased use of regional anaesthesia, when feasible. The study findings were disappointing because, despite additional anaesthesia input and limited work practice changes, there was no increased operating room capacity or reduction in non-operative time. A remarkable average 2 hours of operating room time was lost daily due to avoidable delays. Not unexpectedly, the expansion of regional anaesthesia use for upper extremity surgery reduced the duration of recovery room utilization and stay. Why did the context-specific work practice changes adopted in this study design fail so spectacularly to achieve the desired primary and secondary patient outcomes? Study design and methodology limitations included an anaesthesia rather than a surgeon team DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.cnn","PeriodicalId":21279,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","volume":"24 2","pages":"87-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642860/pdf/rjaic-24-2-87.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.cnn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Rising costs and diminishing reimbursements require hospitals to continually find ways to improve efficiency and productivity. The operating room (OR) is a costintensive environment requiring efficient and effective management. The power of performance of the OR is crucially dependent on the cooperation of the surgical, anaesthesia, nursing and allied health professionals involved. Dr O’Donnell and colleagues from the Department of Anaesthesia, Cork University Hospital, Ireland studied the effects of a number of work practice changes, including modification of patient processing and additional manpower, on non-operating time, number of cases performed and patient cancellations in a dedicated soft-tissue trauma surgical unit [1]. Work practice changes included a transition from sequential patient processing to parallel patient processing and increased use of regional anaesthesia, when feasible. The study findings were disappointing because, despite additional anaesthesia input and limited work practice changes, there was no increased operating room capacity or reduction in non-operative time. A remarkable average 2 hours of operating room time was lost daily due to avoidable delays. Not unexpectedly, the expansion of regional anaesthesia use for upper extremity surgery reduced the duration of recovery room utilization and stay. Why did the context-specific work practice changes adopted in this study design fail so spectacularly to achieve the desired primary and secondary patient outcomes? Study design and methodology limitations included an anaesthesia rather than a surgeon team DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.cnn
期刊介绍:
The Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is the official journal of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and has been published continuously since 1994. It is intended mainly for anaesthesia and intensive care providers, but it is also aimed at specialists in emergency medical care and in pain research and management. The Journal is indexed in Scopus, Embase, PubMed Central as well as the databases of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (CNCSIS) B+ category. The Journal publishes two issues per year, the first one in April and the second one in October, and contains original articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, book reviews and commentaries. The Journal is distributed free of charge to the members of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.