A retrospective cohort study of treatment patterns among patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in the US.

Clinical Sarcoma Research Pub Date : 2017-11-09 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13569-017-0084-4
Victor M Villalobos, Stacey DaCosta Byfield, Sameer R Ghate, Oluwakayode Adejoro
{"title":"A retrospective cohort study of treatment patterns among patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in the US.","authors":"Victor M Villalobos,&nbsp;Stacey DaCosta Byfield,&nbsp;Sameer R Ghate,&nbsp;Oluwakayode Adejoro","doi":"10.1186/s13569-017-0084-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since treatment patterns in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) have not been studied subsequent to US approval of pazopanib in 2012, this study sought to examine mSTS treatment patterns by line of therapy, including regimen and duration of therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study employed administrative claims from a large US health plan from 1/2006-9/2015. Adult mSTS patients were required to have an NCCN-recommended therapy and be continuously enrolled in the health plan during the study period. The most frequent regimens for distinct lines of therapy (LOT) were assessed. Sensitivity analyses evaluated changes to study findings using two alternate medical and pharmacy claims diagnostic algorithms to define the STS study population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 555 patients with mSTS, mean age was 59 years and 54% were male. During the study period, 41% of patients initiated ≥ 2 LOTs; 16% had ≥ 3 LOTs and 5% had ≥ 4 LOTs. Docetaxel + gemcitabine was most common in LOT1, pazopanib in LOT2 and LOT3, and doxorubicin in LOT4. The five most common LOT1 regimens represented 53% of patients; among the remaining 47%, the most common regimen represented < 6% of patients. Among patients with pazopanib in LOT2 and LOT3, the most common prior regimen was docetaxel + gemcitabine (47% and 30% respectively). Kaplan-Meier estimation of median treatment duration overall for LOT1 was 3.5 months, while for LOT2 and LOT3, median treatment duration was 2.9 and 3.3 months, respectively. For both sensitivity analyses, patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar to the original study population, and the five most frequently used regimens in LOT1 and LOT2 were similar among the three populations regardless of the population selection criteria employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Choice of regimen by LOT among patients with mSTS is varied; < 65% of patients in any LOT received the five most common regimens. Pazopanib, the only approved targeted therapy, is primarily used in second and later lines of therapy and is mostly given post docetaxel + gemcitabine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"7 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-017-0084-4","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-017-0084-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Since treatment patterns in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) have not been studied subsequent to US approval of pazopanib in 2012, this study sought to examine mSTS treatment patterns by line of therapy, including regimen and duration of therapy.

Methods: This retrospective study employed administrative claims from a large US health plan from 1/2006-9/2015. Adult mSTS patients were required to have an NCCN-recommended therapy and be continuously enrolled in the health plan during the study period. The most frequent regimens for distinct lines of therapy (LOT) were assessed. Sensitivity analyses evaluated changes to study findings using two alternate medical and pharmacy claims diagnostic algorithms to define the STS study population.

Results: Among 555 patients with mSTS, mean age was 59 years and 54% were male. During the study period, 41% of patients initiated ≥ 2 LOTs; 16% had ≥ 3 LOTs and 5% had ≥ 4 LOTs. Docetaxel + gemcitabine was most common in LOT1, pazopanib in LOT2 and LOT3, and doxorubicin in LOT4. The five most common LOT1 regimens represented 53% of patients; among the remaining 47%, the most common regimen represented < 6% of patients. Among patients with pazopanib in LOT2 and LOT3, the most common prior regimen was docetaxel + gemcitabine (47% and 30% respectively). Kaplan-Meier estimation of median treatment duration overall for LOT1 was 3.5 months, while for LOT2 and LOT3, median treatment duration was 2.9 and 3.3 months, respectively. For both sensitivity analyses, patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar to the original study population, and the five most frequently used regimens in LOT1 and LOT2 were similar among the three populations regardless of the population selection criteria employed.

Conclusion: Choice of regimen by LOT among patients with mSTS is varied; < 65% of patients in any LOT received the five most common regimens. Pazopanib, the only approved targeted therapy, is primarily used in second and later lines of therapy and is mostly given post docetaxel + gemcitabine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国转移性软组织肉瘤患者治疗模式的回顾性队列研究。
背景:由于转移性软组织肉瘤(mSTS)的治疗模式在2012年美国批准帕唑帕尼(pazopanib)后尚未进行研究,本研究试图通过治疗线来检查mSTS的治疗模式,包括治疗方案和治疗时间。方法:本回顾性研究采用了2006年1月至2015年9月期间美国一项大型健康计划的行政索赔。成年mSTS患者被要求接受nccn推荐的治疗,并在研究期间持续参加健康计划。评估了不同治疗线(LOT)的最常见方案。敏感性分析使用两种替代的医疗和药房索赔诊断算法来评估研究结果的变化,以定义STS研究人群。结果:555例mSTS患者,平均年龄59岁,男性占54%。在研究期间,41%的患者开始了≥2个批次;16%有≥3个批次,5%有≥4个批次。多西他赛+吉西他滨在LOT1中最常见,帕唑帕尼在LOT2和LOT3中最常见,阿霉素在LOT4中最常见。五种最常见的LOT1方案占患者的53%;结论:mSTS患者LOT对方案的选择存在差异;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.
期刊最新文献
Partial response to erlotinib in a patient with imatinib-refractory sacral chordoma. Locally recurrent extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the shoulder: a case of complete neoadjuvant radiotherapy response. The role of prognostic nutritional index in the management of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy: the EEG with frontal intermittent delta activity, and rapid resolution with methylene blue: A case report. Simultaneous diagnosis of liver PEComa in a family with known Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1