Preoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia: barium swallow X-ray, high-resolution manometry, or endoscopy?

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s10353-017-0492-y
Michael Weitzendorfer, Gernot Köhler, Stavros A Antoniou, Leo Pallwein-Prettner, Lisa Manzenreiter, Philipp Schredl, Klaus Emmanuel, Oliver Owen Koch
{"title":"Preoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia: barium swallow X-ray, high-resolution manometry, or endoscopy?","authors":"Michael Weitzendorfer,&nbsp;Gernot Köhler,&nbsp;Stavros A Antoniou,&nbsp;Leo Pallwein-Prettner,&nbsp;Lisa Manzenreiter,&nbsp;Philipp Schredl,&nbsp;Klaus Emmanuel,&nbsp;Oliver Owen Koch","doi":"10.1007/s10353-017-0492-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The assessment of hiatal hernias (HH) is typically done with barium swallow X‑ray, upper endoscopy, and by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of these methods in terms of HH detection and their correlation to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis of patients with symptoms of GERD was carried out. The performance of endoscopy and HRM in diagnosing HH was assessed, taking barium swallow X‑ray as a reference. Furthermore, statistically comparative analysis between detected hernias and the presence of reflux disease in ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring (MII) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 112 patients were analyzed. Barium swallow X‑ray showed no correlation either to HR manometrically or to endoscopically assessed HH. Significant accordance in the detection rate of HH was proved between HRM and gastroesophagoscopy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Only endoscopically assessed HH showed a significant correlation with GERD (<i>p</i> = 0.047). No correlation between detected hernias and GERD could be found either with HRM or with barium swallow X‑ray.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barium swallow X‑ray provided the highest rate of HH detection (76.8%). For the reliable exclusion of HH prior to treatment, all three mentioned investigations appear to be necessary in order of low conformity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50475,"journal":{"name":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10353-017-0492-y","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0492-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Background: The assessment of hiatal hernias (HH) is typically done with barium swallow X‑ray, upper endoscopy, and by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of these methods in terms of HH detection and their correlation to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis of patients with symptoms of GERD was carried out. The performance of endoscopy and HRM in diagnosing HH was assessed, taking barium swallow X‑ray as a reference. Furthermore, statistically comparative analysis between detected hernias and the presence of reflux disease in ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring (MII) was performed.

Results: Overall, 112 patients were analyzed. Barium swallow X‑ray showed no correlation either to HR manometrically or to endoscopically assessed HH. Significant accordance in the detection rate of HH was proved between HRM and gastroesophagoscopy (p < 0.001). Only endoscopically assessed HH showed a significant correlation with GERD (p = 0.047). No correlation between detected hernias and GERD could be found either with HRM or with barium swallow X‑ray.

Conclusions: Barium swallow X‑ray provided the highest rate of HH detection (76.8%). For the reliable exclusion of HH prior to treatment, all three mentioned investigations appear to be necessary in order of low conformity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
裂孔疝的术前诊断:钡餐x线,高分辨率测压,还是内窥镜检查?
背景:裂孔疝(HH)的评估通常通过钡餐X线、上内镜和高分辨率食管测压仪(HRM)来完成。本研究的目的是评估这些方法在HH检测方面的临床应用及其与胃食管反流病(GERD)的相关性。方法:对有胃食管反流症状的患者进行回顾性比较分析。以吞钡X线为参考,评估内镜和HRM诊断HH的性能。此外,在动态阻抗- ph监测(MII)中,对检测到的疝气和反流疾病的存在进行了统计比较分析。结果:总共分析了112例患者。钡餐X线片显示与HR压力测量或内窥镜评估的HH均无相关性。HRM与胃食管镜检查HH检出率有显著性差异(p < 0.001)。只有内窥镜评估的HH与GERD有显著相关性(p = 0.047)。HRM或钡餐X线均未发现疝与胃食管反流的相关性。结论:钡餐X线对HH的检出率最高(76.8%)。为了在治疗前可靠地排除HH,上述所有三项调查似乎都是必要的,按符合性低的顺序排列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal European Surgery – Acta Chirurgica Austriaca focuses on general surgery, endocrine surgery, thoracic surgery, heart and vascular surgery. Special features include new surgical and endoscopic techniques such as minimally invasive surgery, robot surgery, and advances in surgery-related biotechnology and surgical oncology. The journal especially addresses benign and malignant esophageal diseases, i.e. achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. In keeping with modern healthcare requirements, the journal’s scope includes inter- and multidisciplinary disease management (diagnosis, therapy and surveillance).
期刊最新文献
Remote training and evaluation of a simulator-based training course for complex endovascular procedures. Training in vascular trauma surgery for non-vascular surgeons: Vascular trauma surgery skills course. Coping with a lack of evidence: living-donor kidney transplantation in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Surgery. Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1