Placement Of Cardiac PacemaKEr Trial (POCKET) - rationale and design: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart International Pub Date : 2017-04-14 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5301/heartint.5000235
Peter Magnusson, Leo Wennström, Robert Kastberg, Per Liv
{"title":"Placement Of Cardiac PacemaKEr Trial (POCKET) - rationale and design: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Peter Magnusson,&nbsp;Leo Wennström,&nbsp;Robert Kastberg,&nbsp;Per Liv","doi":"10.5301/heartint.5000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A pacemaker system consists of one or two leads connected to a device that is implanted into a pocket formed just below the collarbone. This pocket is typically subcutaneous, that is, located just above the pectoral fascia. Even though the size of pacemakers has decreased markedly, complications due to superficial implants do occur. An alternative technique would be intramuscular placement of the pacemaker device, but there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support this approach, which is the rationale for the Placement Of Cardiac PacemaKEr Trial (POCKET). The aim is to study if intramuscular is superior to subcutaneous placement of a pacemaker pocket.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2016, we started to enroll 200 consecutive patients with an indication for bradycardia pacemaker implantation. Patients are randomized to random block sizes, stratified by age group (cut-off: 65 years) and sex, and then randomized to either subcutaneous or intramuscular implant. A concealed allocation procedure is employed, using sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes. Pocket site is blinded to the patient and in all subsequent care. The primary endpoint is patient overall satisfaction with the pocket location at 24 months as measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 0-10. Secondary endpoints are: complications, patient-reported satisfaction at 1, 12, and 24 months (overall satisfaction, pain, discomfort, degree of unsightly appearance, movement problems, and sleep problems due to device).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POCKET is a prospective interventional RCT designed to evaluate if intramuscular is superior to subcutaneous placement of a bradycardia pacemaker during a two-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"12 1","pages":"e8-e11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/heartint.5000235","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/heartint.5000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: A pacemaker system consists of one or two leads connected to a device that is implanted into a pocket formed just below the collarbone. This pocket is typically subcutaneous, that is, located just above the pectoral fascia. Even though the size of pacemakers has decreased markedly, complications due to superficial implants do occur. An alternative technique would be intramuscular placement of the pacemaker device, but there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support this approach, which is the rationale for the Placement Of Cardiac PacemaKEr Trial (POCKET). The aim is to study if intramuscular is superior to subcutaneous placement of a pacemaker pocket.

Methods: In October 2016, we started to enroll 200 consecutive patients with an indication for bradycardia pacemaker implantation. Patients are randomized to random block sizes, stratified by age group (cut-off: 65 years) and sex, and then randomized to either subcutaneous or intramuscular implant. A concealed allocation procedure is employed, using sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes. Pocket site is blinded to the patient and in all subsequent care. The primary endpoint is patient overall satisfaction with the pocket location at 24 months as measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) 0-10. Secondary endpoints are: complications, patient-reported satisfaction at 1, 12, and 24 months (overall satisfaction, pain, discomfort, degree of unsightly appearance, movement problems, and sleep problems due to device).

Conclusions: POCKET is a prospective interventional RCT designed to evaluate if intramuscular is superior to subcutaneous placement of a bradycardia pacemaker during a two-year follow-up.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏起搏器放置试验(POCKET) -基本原理和设计:一项随机对照试验。
背景:起搏器系统由一根或两根连接到一个装置的导线组成,该装置被植入锁骨下方形成的口袋中。这个口袋通常位于皮下,即位于胸筋膜上方。尽管起搏器的尺寸已经明显减小,但由于浅表植入引起的并发症仍然存在。另一种技术是肌肉内放置起搏器装置,但没有随机对照试验(rct)支持这种方法,这是心脏起搏器放置试验(POCKET)的基本原理。目的是研究肌肉内放置心脏起搏器是否优于皮下放置。方法:2016年10月,我们开始招募200例有心动过缓起搏器植入指征的连续患者。患者被随机分配到随机块大小,按年龄组(截止年龄:65岁)和性别分层,然后随机分配到皮下或肌肉内植入。采用了一种隐蔽的分配程序,使用顺序编号的密封信封。口袋部位对患者和所有后续护理都是不可见的。主要终点是患者在24个月时对口袋位置的总体满意度,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS) 0-10进行测量。次要终点是:并发症、患者在1、12和24个月时报告的满意度(总体满意度、疼痛、不适、外观不美观程度、运动问题和由器械引起的睡眠问题)。结论:POCKET是一项前瞻性介入随机对照试验,旨在评估在两年随访期间,肌内植入心动过缓起搏器是否优于皮下植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Commonly Used 3D Mapping Systems in Acute Success Rates of Catheter Ablation Procedures. Evolution of Disease-modifying Therapy for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis. Femoral Neck Osteoporosis Is Associated with a Higher Odds of Coronary Artery Disease in Indian Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-sectional Study from a Teaching Hospital in Southern India. Cardiovascular Implications of Semaglutide in Obesity Management: Redefining Cardiovascular Health Strategies. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the NAVITOR Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1