Motivation and perceived competence for healthy eating and exercise among overweight/obese adolescents in comparison to normal weight adolescents.

Q1 Medicine BMC Obesity Pub Date : 2017-11-17 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40608-017-0172-2
Suzanne Mokhtari, Benjamin Grace, Youngju Pak, Astrid Reina, Quinn Durand, Jennifer K Yee
{"title":"Motivation and perceived competence for healthy eating and exercise among overweight/obese adolescents in comparison to normal weight adolescents.","authors":"Suzanne Mokhtari,&nbsp;Benjamin Grace,&nbsp;Youngju Pak,&nbsp;Astrid Reina,&nbsp;Quinn Durand,&nbsp;Jennifer K Yee","doi":"10.1186/s40608-017-0172-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current literature on determinants of behavior change in weight management lacks sufficient studies on type of motivation among children/adolescents, on perceived competence, and in relation to healthy eating. This study aimed to investigate type of motivation and levels of perceived competence for healthy diet and exercise, as well as general self efficacy among adolescents. We hypothesized that overweight/obese adolescents would demonstrate lower autonomous motivation and perceived competence regarding diet and exercise, and lower self-efficacy in general, and that the scores would be influenced by socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Normal weight (<i>n</i> = 40, body mass index < 85% for age and gender) and overweight or obese adolescents (<i>n</i> = 60, body mass index ≥ 85% for age and gender) aged 13-18 years were recruited from pediatric ambulatory clinics. Information was collected about demographics, socioeconomic factors, and lifestyle behaviors. The study subjects completed a survey including the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) and the Perceived Competence Scale (PCS) for healthy eating and exercise, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). Composite scores for the three scales were compared between the two groups using the using the two-sample t-test (for normal data) or the Mann-Whitney U test (for non-parametric data). Relationships between the composite scores and patient characteristics were determined using Pearson or Spearman's correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the total cohort was 15.9 ± 1.9 years. 54% were female, and 82% identified as Latino/Hispanic. In comparison to normal weight subjects, overweight/obese adolescents exhibited higher scores for controlled motivation (mean ± standard deviation 28.3 ± 9.3 vs 18.1 ± 8.1) and higher perceived competence [median and 25-75% interquartile range 22.5 (19.0-26.0) vs 20.0 (15.5-25.0)] in relation to eating a healthy diet. These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, paternal education, and family income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overweight/obese adolescents did not lack autonomous motivation but demonstrated higher controlled motivation and perceived competence for healthy eating in comparison to normal weight adolescents, independent of socioeconomic factors. In the clinical practice of weight management, providers should carefully assess adolescents for type of motivation and perceived competence, while accounting for potential barriers to behavior change.</p>","PeriodicalId":37440,"journal":{"name":"BMC Obesity","volume":"4 ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40608-017-0172-2","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-017-0172-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: The current literature on determinants of behavior change in weight management lacks sufficient studies on type of motivation among children/adolescents, on perceived competence, and in relation to healthy eating. This study aimed to investigate type of motivation and levels of perceived competence for healthy diet and exercise, as well as general self efficacy among adolescents. We hypothesized that overweight/obese adolescents would demonstrate lower autonomous motivation and perceived competence regarding diet and exercise, and lower self-efficacy in general, and that the scores would be influenced by socioeconomic factors.

Methods: Normal weight (n = 40, body mass index < 85% for age and gender) and overweight or obese adolescents (n = 60, body mass index ≥ 85% for age and gender) aged 13-18 years were recruited from pediatric ambulatory clinics. Information was collected about demographics, socioeconomic factors, and lifestyle behaviors. The study subjects completed a survey including the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) and the Perceived Competence Scale (PCS) for healthy eating and exercise, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). Composite scores for the three scales were compared between the two groups using the using the two-sample t-test (for normal data) or the Mann-Whitney U test (for non-parametric data). Relationships between the composite scores and patient characteristics were determined using Pearson or Spearman's correlations.

Results: The average age of the total cohort was 15.9 ± 1.9 years. 54% were female, and 82% identified as Latino/Hispanic. In comparison to normal weight subjects, overweight/obese adolescents exhibited higher scores for controlled motivation (mean ± standard deviation 28.3 ± 9.3 vs 18.1 ± 8.1) and higher perceived competence [median and 25-75% interquartile range 22.5 (19.0-26.0) vs 20.0 (15.5-25.0)] in relation to eating a healthy diet. These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, paternal education, and family income.

Conclusions: Overweight/obese adolescents did not lack autonomous motivation but demonstrated higher controlled motivation and perceived competence for healthy eating in comparison to normal weight adolescents, independent of socioeconomic factors. In the clinical practice of weight management, providers should carefully assess adolescents for type of motivation and perceived competence, while accounting for potential barriers to behavior change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超重/肥胖青少年与正常体重青少年的健康饮食和运动动机和感知能力比较
背景:目前关于体重管理中行为改变决定因素的文献缺乏对儿童/青少年的动机类型、感知能力以及与健康饮食的关系的充分研究。本研究旨在探讨青少年健康饮食和运动的动机类型、认知能力水平以及一般自我效能感。我们假设超重/肥胖青少年在饮食和运动方面表现出较低的自主动机和感知能力,总体上表现出较低的自我效能,并且得分会受到社会经济因素的影响。方法:招募年龄在13-18岁、体重正常(n = 40,体重指数n = 60,年龄和性别体重指数≥85%)的儿科门诊患者。收集了有关人口统计、社会经济因素和生活方式行为的信息。研究对象完成了治疗自我调节问卷(TSRQ)、健康饮食与运动感知能力量表(PCS)和一般自我效能量表(GSES)。使用双样本t检验(正常数据)或Mann-Whitney U检验(非参数数据)比较两组间三个量表的综合得分。综合评分与患者特征之间的关系采用Pearson或Spearman相关来确定。结果:整个队列的平均年龄为15.9±1.9岁。其中54%为女性,82%为拉丁裔/西班牙裔。与正常体重者相比,超重/肥胖青少年在饮食健康方面表现出更高的控制动机得分(平均±标准差28.3±9.3 vs 18.1±8.1)和更高的感知能力[中位数和25-75%四分位数间距22.5 (19.0-26.0)vs 20.0(15.5-25.0)]。在调整了年龄、性别、父亲教育程度和家庭收入等因素后,这些差异仍然存在。结论:与正常体重的青少年相比,超重/肥胖青少年并不缺乏自主动机,但在健康饮食方面表现出更高的控制动机和感知能力,与社会经济因素无关。在体重管理的临床实践中,提供者应该仔细评估青少年的动机类型和感知能力,同时考虑到行为改变的潜在障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Obesity
BMC Obesity Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cesation (2019). Information not localized.
期刊最新文献
Family food environment factors associated with obesity outcomes in early childhood. Design and methods of the Healthy Kids & Families study: a parent-focused community health worker-delivered childhood obesity prevention intervention. Larger omental adipocytes correlate with greater Fetuin-A reduction following sleeve gastrectomy. "I love having a healthy lifestyle" - a qualitative study investigating body mass index trajectories from childhood to mid-adulthood. Family Spirit Nurture (FSN) - a randomized controlled trial to prevent early childhood obesity in American Indian populations: trial rationale and study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1