Time has not passed for the tilt table test.

Jani Pirinen, Markku Walamies
{"title":"Time has not passed for the tilt table test.","authors":"Jani Pirinen,&nbsp;Markku Walamies","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The tilt table test is used for determining the loss of consciousness, and in the case of reflex syncope, for gaining insight into the circulatory mechanism. In 2015, all tilt tests within the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) were performed in the clinical physiology unit of the HUS Medical Imaging Center at Peijas Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients' medical history, circulation monitor printouts, and medical reports were recorded from all tilt tests carried out during 2015. Positive tilt tests were classified according to the VASIS classification and the elapsed time to loss of consciousness was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a total of 133 patients, abnormal upright tolerance was found in 30 per cent of the patients. The average time to loss of consciousness was 35.2 minutes. The most common mechanism of syncope was mixed reaction (60.0%), whereas vasovagal reaction (22.5%), cardioinhibitory reaction (10.0%), and lacking stroke volume response (7.5%) were less common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practices of referral for the tilt table test vary among the different units of HUS. In our material, the cardioinhibitory reaction was less common than in previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72850,"journal":{"name":"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The tilt table test is used for determining the loss of consciousness, and in the case of reflex syncope, for gaining insight into the circulatory mechanism. In 2015, all tilt tests within the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) were performed in the clinical physiology unit of the HUS Medical Imaging Center at Peijas Hospital.

Methods: The patients' medical history, circulation monitor printouts, and medical reports were recorded from all tilt tests carried out during 2015. Positive tilt tests were classified according to the VASIS classification and the elapsed time to loss of consciousness was observed.

Results: Among a total of 133 patients, abnormal upright tolerance was found in 30 per cent of the patients. The average time to loss of consciousness was 35.2 minutes. The most common mechanism of syncope was mixed reaction (60.0%), whereas vasovagal reaction (22.5%), cardioinhibitory reaction (10.0%), and lacking stroke volume response (7.5%) were less common.

Conclusions: Practices of referral for the tilt table test vary among the different units of HUS. In our material, the cardioinhibitory reaction was less common than in previous studies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾斜台试验的时间还没有过去。
倾斜台试验用于确定意识丧失,在反射性晕厥的情况下,用于深入了解循环机制。2015年,赫尔辛基和乌西马医院区(HUS)的所有倾斜测试都在佩哈斯医院HUS医学成像中心的临床生理学单元进行。方法:记录2015年所有倾斜度试验患者的病史、循环监测打印结果和医疗报告。根据VASIS分类对阳性倾斜试验进行分类,并观察到意识丧失的时间。结果:133例患者中,30%的患者出现直立耐受异常。失去意识的平均时间为35.2分钟。晕厥最常见的机制是混合反应(60.0%),而血管迷走神经反应(22.5%)、心脏抑制反应(10.0%)和缺乏卒中容量反应(7.5%)较少见。结论:倾斜台试验的转诊做法因溶血性尿毒综合征的不同单位而异。在我们的材料中,心脏抑制反应不像以前的研究那么常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[AMMONIUM CHLORIDE POISONING]. [Ecological ethics]. [Alone]. [Personality disorders]. [Febrile seizures].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1