Influence of adenomyosis on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis.

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1002/uog.18989
C Scala, U Leone Roberti Maggiore, A Racca, F Barra, V G Vellone, P L Venturini, S Ferrero
{"title":"Influence of adenomyosis on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis.","authors":"C Scala,&nbsp;U Leone Roberti Maggiore,&nbsp;A Racca,&nbsp;F Barra,&nbsp;V G Vellone,&nbsp;P L Venturini,&nbsp;S Ferrero","doi":"10.1002/uog.18989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Several studies have investigated the correlation between endometriosis and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. However, the role of adenomyosis as a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in women with endometriosis has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to explore if fetal and maternal outcomes, in particular the incidence of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant, are different in pregnant women with endometriosis only from in those with the concomitant presence of diffuse or focal adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively during a 3-year period. We included 206 pregnant women with endometriosis: 148 (71.8%) with endometriosis only, 38 (18.4%) with focal adenomyosis and 20 (9.7%) with diffuse adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was diagnosed using ultrasonography and was classified as focal or diffuse. The study included patients who conceived spontaneously or by an assisted reproductive technique. Demographics, ultrasound variables and outcome were compared between women with endometriosis only and those with diffuse and those with focal adenomyosis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of variables with SGA at birth in women with diffuse and those with focal adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three groups were similar in demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, mode of conception). Patients with diffuse adenomyosis compared with those with endometriosis only had significantly lower pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (0.61 vs 0.88 multiple of the median, P < 0.001), higher mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the first (2.23 vs 1.67, P < 0.001) and second (1.30 vs 0.94, P < 0.001) trimesters of pregnancy, and higher incidence of SGA (40% vs 10.8%, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in patients with focal adenomyosis compared with those with endometriosis only. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that diffuse adenomyosis (odds ratio = 3.744; 95% CI, 1.158-12.099; P = 0.027) was the only independent risk factor for SGA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of diffuse adenomyosis in pregnant women with endometriosis is strongly associated with delivery of a SGA infant. Women with diffuse adenomyosis should be treated as being at high risk of placental dysfunction, and these pregnancies might therefore need closer monitoring. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"52 5","pages":"666-671"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/uog.18989","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Objectives: Several studies have investigated the correlation between endometriosis and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. However, the role of adenomyosis as a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in women with endometriosis has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to explore if fetal and maternal outcomes, in particular the incidence of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant, are different in pregnant women with endometriosis only from in those with the concomitant presence of diffuse or focal adenomyosis.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively during a 3-year period. We included 206 pregnant women with endometriosis: 148 (71.8%) with endometriosis only, 38 (18.4%) with focal adenomyosis and 20 (9.7%) with diffuse adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was diagnosed using ultrasonography and was classified as focal or diffuse. The study included patients who conceived spontaneously or by an assisted reproductive technique. Demographics, ultrasound variables and outcome were compared between women with endometriosis only and those with diffuse and those with focal adenomyosis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of variables with SGA at birth in women with diffuse and those with focal adenomyosis.

Results: The three groups were similar in demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, mode of conception). Patients with diffuse adenomyosis compared with those with endometriosis only had significantly lower pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (0.61 vs 0.88 multiple of the median, P < 0.001), higher mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the first (2.23 vs 1.67, P < 0.001) and second (1.30 vs 0.94, P < 0.001) trimesters of pregnancy, and higher incidence of SGA (40% vs 10.8%, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in patients with focal adenomyosis compared with those with endometriosis only. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that diffuse adenomyosis (odds ratio = 3.744; 95% CI, 1.158-12.099; P = 0.027) was the only independent risk factor for SGA.

Conclusions: The presence of diffuse adenomyosis in pregnant women with endometriosis is strongly associated with delivery of a SGA infant. Women with diffuse adenomyosis should be treated as being at high risk of placental dysfunction, and these pregnancies might therefore need closer monitoring. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜异位症患者子宫腺肌病对妊娠和围产期结局的影响。
目的:几项研究探讨了子宫内膜异位症与不良妊娠和围产期结局的关系。然而,子宫腺肌病作为子宫内膜异位症妇女不良围产期结局的危险因素的作用尚未确定。本研究的目的是探讨仅患有子宫内膜异位症的孕妇与伴有弥漫性或局灶性子宫腺肌病的孕妇的胎儿和母体结局,特别是小胎龄(SGA)婴儿的发生率是否不同。方法:对前瞻性收集的3年资料进行回顾性分析。我们纳入206例子宫内膜异位症孕妇:单纯子宫内膜异位症148例(71.8%),局灶性子宫肌症38例(18.4%),弥漫性子宫肌症20例(9.7%)。超声诊断子宫腺肌病,分为局灶性和弥漫性。该研究包括那些自然受孕或通过辅助生殖技术受孕的患者。对单纯子宫内膜异位症、弥漫性和局灶性子宫内膜异位症患者的人口统计学、超声变量和结果进行比较。采用Logistic回归分析来评估弥漫性和局灶性子宫腺肌症妇女出生时SGA与变量的关系。结果:三组在人口统计学特征(年龄、体重指数、受孕方式)上相似。弥漫性子宫内膜异位症患者与子宫内膜异位症患者相比,妊娠相关血浆蛋白A显著降低(中位数0.61 vs 0.88倍,P)。结论:子宫内膜异位症孕妇弥漫性子宫内膜异位症与SGA婴儿的分娩密切相关。弥漫性子宫腺肌病的妇女应被视为胎盘功能障碍的高危人群,因此这些妊娠可能需要更密切的监测。版权所有©2017 ISUOG。由John Wiley & Sons Ltd出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
期刊最新文献
Mixed germ cell tumor presenting with mixed sonographic appearance and unique clinical presentation. Local injection of thrombin: a novel fertility-preserving approach for treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy complicated by persistent uterine pseudoaneurysm. Right-sided posterior ductus arteriosus: unusual vascular ring in two fetuses with univentricular physiology. Three-dimensional ultrasound demonstration of boomerang vessel of Type-III vasa previa at 21 weeks' gestation. Fetal heart, brain and placenta: introducing a three-way (patho)physiological pairing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1