Do Knee Bracing and Delayed Weight Bearing Affect Mid-Term Functional Outcome after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Q1 Medicine Joints Pub Date : 2017-09-15 eCollection Date: 2017-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1606617
Riccardo Di Miceli, Carlotta Bustos Marambio, Alessandro Zati, Roberta Monesi, Maria Grazia Benedetti
{"title":"Do Knee Bracing and Delayed Weight Bearing Affect Mid-Term Functional Outcome after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?","authors":"Riccardo Di Miceli,&nbsp;Carlotta Bustos Marambio,&nbsp;Alessandro Zati,&nbsp;Roberta Monesi,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Benedetti","doi":"10.1055/s-0037-1606617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The aim of this study was to assess the effect of knee bracing and timing of full weight bearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. <b>Methods</b>  We performed a retrospective study on 41 patients with ACLR. Patients were divided in two groups: ACLR group, who received isolated ACL reconstruction and ACLR-OI group who received ACL reconstruction and adjunctive surgery. Information about age at surgery, bracing, full or progressive weight bearing permission after surgery were collected for the two groups. Subjective IKDC score was obtained at follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the two groups for IKDC score. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effect of postoperative regimen (knee bracing and weight bearing) on functional outcomes. <b>Results</b>  The mean age of patients was 30.8 ± 10.6 years. Mean IKDC score was 87.4 ± 13.9. The mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.8 years. Twenty-two (53.7%) patients underwent ACLR only, while 19 (46.3%) also received other interventions, such as meniscal repair and/or collateral ligament suture. Analysis of overall data showed no differences between the groups for IKDC score. Patients in the ACLR group exhibited a significantly better IKDC score when no brace and full weight bearing after 4 weeks from surgery was prescribed in comparison with patients who worn a brace and had delayed full weight bearing. No differences were found with respect to the use of brace and postoperative weight bearing regimen in the ACLR-OI group. <b>Conclusion</b>  Brace and delayed weight bearing after ACLR have a negative influence on long-term functional outcomes. Further research is required to explore possible differences in the patients operated on ACLR and other intervention with respect to the use of a brace and the timing of full weight bearing to identify optimal recovery strategies. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Level III, retrospective observational study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"5 4","pages":"202-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0037-1606617","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose  The aim of this study was to assess the effect of knee bracing and timing of full weight bearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Methods  We performed a retrospective study on 41 patients with ACLR. Patients were divided in two groups: ACLR group, who received isolated ACL reconstruction and ACLR-OI group who received ACL reconstruction and adjunctive surgery. Information about age at surgery, bracing, full or progressive weight bearing permission after surgery were collected for the two groups. Subjective IKDC score was obtained at follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the two groups for IKDC score. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effect of postoperative regimen (knee bracing and weight bearing) on functional outcomes. Results  The mean age of patients was 30.8 ± 10.6 years. Mean IKDC score was 87.4 ± 13.9. The mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.8 years. Twenty-two (53.7%) patients underwent ACLR only, while 19 (46.3%) also received other interventions, such as meniscal repair and/or collateral ligament suture. Analysis of overall data showed no differences between the groups for IKDC score. Patients in the ACLR group exhibited a significantly better IKDC score when no brace and full weight bearing after 4 weeks from surgery was prescribed in comparison with patients who worn a brace and had delayed full weight bearing. No differences were found with respect to the use of brace and postoperative weight bearing regimen in the ACLR-OI group. Conclusion  Brace and delayed weight bearing after ACLR have a negative influence on long-term functional outcomes. Further research is required to explore possible differences in the patients operated on ACLR and other intervention with respect to the use of a brace and the timing of full weight bearing to identify optimal recovery strategies. Level of Evidence  Level III, retrospective observational study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节支撑和延迟负重对前交叉韧带重建术后中期功能预后有影响吗?
目的本研究的目的是评估前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后膝关节支撑和完全负重时间对中期随访功能结局的影响。方法对41例ACLR患者进行回顾性研究。患者分为ACLR组和ACLR- oi组,ACLR组接受ACL重建和辅助手术。收集两组患者的手术年龄、支具、术后完全或渐进负重许可等信息。随访时获得主观IKDC评分。比较两组患者的IKDC评分进行统计学分析。进行亚组分析以评估术后方案(膝关节支撑和负重)对功能结局的影响。结果患者平均年龄30.8±10.6岁。平均IKDC评分为87.4±13.9。平均随访时间为3.5±1.8年。22例(53.7%)患者仅行ACLR, 19例(46.3%)患者同时接受其他干预,如半月板修复和/或副韧带缝合。整体数据分析显示各组间IKDC评分无差异。ACLR组患者在手术后4周不使用支具并完全负重时,与使用支具并延迟完全负重的患者相比,IKDC评分明显更好。ACLR-OI组在支具的使用和术后负重方案方面没有发现差异。结论支具和延迟负重对ACLR术后远期功能预后有负面影响。需要进一步的研究来探讨ACLR手术和其他干预的患者在使用支具和完全负重的时间方面的可能差异,以确定最佳的恢复策略。证据等级:III级,回顾性观察性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Joints
Joints Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Joints is the official publication of SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology). As an Open Acccess journal, it publishes papers on clinical and basic research, review articles, technical notes, case reports, and editorials about the latest developments in knee surgery, arthroscopy, sports traumatology, cartilage, orthopaedic technology, upper limb, and related rehabilitation. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal''s content are always welcome.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Midterm Results. Hip and Groin Pain in Soccer Players. Acute Groin Pain Syndrome Due to Internal Obturator Muscle Injury in a Professional Football Player. Short-Term Outcomes of the Grammont Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison between First and Second Generation Delta Prosthesis. The Relationship between Kinesiophobia and Return to Sport after Shoulder Surgery for Recurrent Anterior Instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1