A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Critical Analysis Examining the Use of Prednisolone for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Croup.

Q3 Nursing Open Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2017-11-30 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874434601711010241
Anna Catherine Elliott, Graham R Williamson
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Critical Analysis Examining the Use of Prednisolone for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Croup.","authors":"Anna Catherine Elliott,&nbsp;Graham R Williamson","doi":"10.2174/1874434601711010241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many randomised control trials and systematic reviews have examined the benefits of glucocorticoids for the treatment of croup in children, but they have reported mainly on dexamethasone as an oral treatment for croup. No systematic reviews have examined prednisolone alone.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine in a systematic review of the literature whether a single dose of oral prednisolone is as effective as a single dose of dexamethasone for reducing croup symptoms in children.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>A detailed search was conducted on the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE EBSCO, MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ProQuest, EMBASE, JBI, Sum search, and OpenGrey. Study authors were contacted.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Randomised Controlled Trials, clinical trials or chart reviews which examined children with croup who were treated with prednisolone alone, or when prednisolone was compared to a dexamethasone treatment and the effectiveness of the intervention was objectively measured using croup scores and re-attendance as primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, relevant studies were identified. Scores were graded agreed by two independent reviewers using QualSyst.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Four studies met the inclusion criteria, but were too heterogeneous to combine in statistical meta-analysis. The result suggests that although prednisolone appears as effective as dexamethasone when first given, it is less so for preventing re-presentation. Trial sample sizes were small, making firm conclusions difficult, however, a second dose of prednisolone the following day may be useful. More research including cost-benefit analysis is needed to examine the efficacy of prednisolone compared to dexamethasone.</p>","PeriodicalId":38868,"journal":{"name":"Open Nursing Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"241-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874434601711010241","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Many randomised control trials and systematic reviews have examined the benefits of glucocorticoids for the treatment of croup in children, but they have reported mainly on dexamethasone as an oral treatment for croup. No systematic reviews have examined prednisolone alone.

Aim: To determine in a systematic review of the literature whether a single dose of oral prednisolone is as effective as a single dose of dexamethasone for reducing croup symptoms in children.

Search strategy: A detailed search was conducted on the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE EBSCO, MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ProQuest, EMBASE, JBI, Sum search, and OpenGrey. Study authors were contacted.

Selection criteria: Randomised Controlled Trials, clinical trials or chart reviews which examined children with croup who were treated with prednisolone alone, or when prednisolone was compared to a dexamethasone treatment and the effectiveness of the intervention was objectively measured using croup scores and re-attendance as primary outcomes.

Data collection and analysis: Following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, relevant studies were identified. Scores were graded agreed by two independent reviewers using QualSyst.

Main results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria, but were too heterogeneous to combine in statistical meta-analysis. The result suggests that although prednisolone appears as effective as dexamethasone when first given, it is less so for preventing re-presentation. Trial sample sizes were small, making firm conclusions difficult, however, a second dose of prednisolone the following day may be useful. More research including cost-benefit analysis is needed to examine the efficacy of prednisolone compared to dexamethasone.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对使用强的松龙治疗轻中度组的系统评价和综合批判性分析。
背景:许多随机对照试验和系统评价已经检查了糖皮质激素治疗儿童group的益处,但它们主要报道了地塞米松作为group的口服治疗。没有系统评价单独检查强的松龙。目的:通过对文献的系统回顾,确定单剂量口服强的松龙与单剂量地塞米松在减轻儿童群症状方面是否同样有效。检索策略:在以下数据库中进行了详细的检索:CINAHL, MEDLINE EBSCO, MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ProQuest, EMBASE, JBI, Sum Search, OpenGrey。我们联系了研究作者。选择标准:随机对照试验,临床试验或图表回顾,这些试验检查了单独使用强的松龙治疗的儿童,或将强的松龙与地塞米松治疗进行比较,并且使用组评分和重新出勤作为主要结果客观地衡量干预的有效性。数据收集和分析:遵循PRISMA系统评价指南,确定相关研究。评分由两名使用QualSyst的独立评论家同意。主要结果:4项研究符合纳入标准,但异质性太大,无法纳入统计荟萃分析。结果表明,虽然泼尼松龙在首次使用时与地塞米松一样有效,但在预防复发方面效果不如地塞米松。试验样本量小,很难得出确切的结论,然而,第二天第二次泼尼松龙可能有用。需要更多的研究,包括成本效益分析来检验泼尼松龙与地塞米松的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Nursing Journal
Open Nursing Journal Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Open Nursing Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited thematic issues in all areas of nursing. The Open Nursing Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide. We welcome papers related to nursing and midwifery, with specific relevance to health care practice, policy and research. We publish under the following themes: -Nursing and Midwifery practice -Education -Research methodology -Evidence based practice -New role in practice -Systematic reviews -Case studies -Ethical and professional issues -Management in health care -Sustainability in health and health care provision All authors should make clear how the implications of their paper for nursing, midwifery and health care practice. They should also clearly identify the ‘take home message’ from their paper.
期刊最新文献
Management Practices Promoting Sustained Implementation of the Quality Register Senior Alert for Older Adults in Municipal Care in Sweden. Nurse Managers' Emotional Intelligence and Effective Leadership: A Review of Current Evidence. Effectiveness of the "Create Sensitivity" Caring Model on Blood Glucose/ Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Depressive Symptoms and Complications Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Gender Differences. Persistent (Anxiety and Depression) Affected Academic Achievement and Absenteeism in Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1