The Impact of Different Classification Criteria Sets on the Estimated Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Diastolic Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

IF 2.3 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY International Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-04 DOI:10.1155/2017/2323410
Lebogang Mokotedi, Sulé Gunter, Chanel Robinson, Gavin R Norton, Angela J Woodiwiss, Linda Tsang, Patrick H Dessein, Aletta M E Millen
{"title":"The Impact of Different Classification Criteria Sets on the Estimated Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Diastolic Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis.","authors":"Lebogang Mokotedi,&nbsp;Sulé Gunter,&nbsp;Chanel Robinson,&nbsp;Gavin R Norton,&nbsp;Angela J Woodiwiss,&nbsp;Linda Tsang,&nbsp;Patrick H Dessein,&nbsp;Aletta M E Millen","doi":"10.1155/2017/2323410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the estimated prevalence and potential determinants of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction upon applying different classification criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). LV diastolic function was assessed echocardiographically by pulsed Doppler (<i>E</i>/<i>A</i>), tissue Doppler (<i>E</i>/<i>e</i>', lateral and septal <i>e</i>'), and left atrial volume index in 176 RA patients. Relationships of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and RA characteristics with LV diastolic function and dysfunction according to previous and current criteria were determined in multivariate regression models. Waist-hip ratio was associated with <i>E</i>/<i>A</i> (standardised <i>β</i> (SE) = -0.28 ± 0.09, <i>p</i> = 0.0002) and lateral <i>e</i>' (standardised <i>β</i> (SE) = 0.26 ± 0.09, <i>p</i> = 0.01); low diastolic blood pressure was related to <i>E</i>/<i>e</i>' (standardised <i>β</i> (SE) = -0.16 ± 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Diastolic dysfunction prevalence differed upon applying previous (59%) compared to current (22%) criteria (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). One SD increase in waist-hip ratio was associated with diastolic dysfunction when applying current criteria (OR = 2.61 (95% CI = 1.51-4.52), <i>p</i> = 0.0006), whereas one SD increase in diastolic blood pressure was inversely related to diastolic dysfunction upon using previous criteria (OR = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40-0.81), <i>p</i> = 0.002). In conclusion, application of current and previous diastolic dysfunction criteria markedly alters the prevalence and risk factors associated with diastolic dysfunction in RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/2323410","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2323410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study compared the estimated prevalence and potential determinants of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction upon applying different classification criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). LV diastolic function was assessed echocardiographically by pulsed Doppler (E/A), tissue Doppler (E/e', lateral and septal e'), and left atrial volume index in 176 RA patients. Relationships of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and RA characteristics with LV diastolic function and dysfunction according to previous and current criteria were determined in multivariate regression models. Waist-hip ratio was associated with E/A (standardised β (SE) = -0.28 ± 0.09, p = 0.0002) and lateral e' (standardised β (SE) = 0.26 ± 0.09, p = 0.01); low diastolic blood pressure was related to E/e' (standardised β (SE) = -0.16 ± 0.08, p = 0.04). Diastolic dysfunction prevalence differed upon applying previous (59%) compared to current (22%) criteria (p < 0.0001). One SD increase in waist-hip ratio was associated with diastolic dysfunction when applying current criteria (OR = 2.61 (95% CI = 1.51-4.52), p = 0.0006), whereas one SD increase in diastolic blood pressure was inversely related to diastolic dysfunction upon using previous criteria (OR = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40-0.81), p = 0.002). In conclusion, application of current and previous diastolic dysfunction criteria markedly alters the prevalence and risk factors associated with diastolic dysfunction in RA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同分类标准对类风湿关节炎患者舒张功能障碍患病率及相关危险因素的影响
本研究比较了在类风湿关节炎(RA)中应用不同分类标准的左室(LV)舒张功能障碍的估计患病率和潜在决定因素。采用脉冲多普勒(E/A)、组织多普勒(E/ E′、外侧和间隔E′)和左房容积指数对176例RA患者左室舒张功能进行超声心动图评价。通过多元回归模型确定传统心血管危险因素和RA特征与既往和现行标准左室舒张功能和功能障碍的关系。腰臀比与E/A(标准化β (SE) = -0.28±0.09,p = 0.0002)和侧位E′(标准化β (SE) = 0.26±0.09,p = 0.01)相关;低舒张压与E/ E′相关(标准化β (SE) = -0.16±0.08,p = 0.04)。舒张功能不全的患病率在应用先前(59%)和当前(22%)标准时存在差异(p < 0.0001)。应用当前标准时,腰臀比增加1个标准差与舒张功能障碍相关(OR = 2.61 (95% CI = 1.51-4.52), p = 0.0006),而使用以前标准时,舒张压增加1个标准差与舒张功能障碍呈负相关(OR = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40-0.81), p = 0.002)。总之,当前和以往舒张功能障碍标准的应用显著改变了RA患者舒张功能障碍的患病率和相关危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Observational Study on the Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease Secondary to Dermatomyositis and Antisynthetase Syndrome. Exploring the Psychiatric Manifestations of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome: A Narrative Review Association of Baseline Serum Soluble Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor Levels with the Response of Rheumatoid Arthritis to Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy. Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) and ITP Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Modalities Association of Cytokine IL-17, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-12 Gene Polymorphisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1