Ultrasound evaluation of the airway in the ED: a feasibility study.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Critical Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2018-01-18 DOI:10.1186/s13089-018-0083-6
Elizabeth A Hall, Ibrahim Showaihi, Frances S Shofer, Nova L Panebianco, Anthony J Dean
{"title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the airway in the ED: a feasibility study.","authors":"Elizabeth A Hall,&nbsp;Ibrahim Showaihi,&nbsp;Frances S Shofer,&nbsp;Nova L Panebianco,&nbsp;Anthony J Dean","doi":"10.1186/s13089-018-0083-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognition of the difficult airway is a critical element of emergency practice. Mallampati score and body mass index (BMI) are not always predictive and they may be unavailable in critically ill patients. Ultrasonography provides high-resolution images that are rapidly obtainable, mobile, and non-invasive. Studies have shown correlation of ultrasound measurements with difficult laryngoscopy; however, none have been performed in the Emergency Department (ED) using a consistent scanning protocol.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study seeks to determine the feasibility of ultrasound measurements of the upper airway performed in the ED by emergency physicians, the inter-rater reliability of such measurements, and their relationship with Mallampati score and BMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of volunteer ED patients and healthy volunteers with no known airway issues, aged > 18 years, had images taken of their airway using a standardized ultrasound scanning protocol by two EM ultrasound fellowship trained physicians. Measurements consisted of tongue base, tongue base-to-skin, epiglottic width and thickness, and pre-epiglottic space. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to summarize measurements. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Analysis of variance with linear contrasts was used to compare measurements with Mallampati scores and linear regression with BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39 participants, 50% were female, 50% white, 42% black, with median age 32.5 years (range 19-90), and BMI 26.0 (range 19-47). Mean ± SD for each measurement (mm) was as follows: tongue base (44.6 ± 5.1), tongue base-to-skin (60.9 ± 5.3), epiglottic width (15.0 ± 2.8) and thickness (2.0 ± 0.37), and pre-epiglottic space (11.4 ± 2.4). ICCs ranged from 0.76 to 0.88 for all measurements except epiglottis thickness (ICC = 0.57). Tongue base and tongue base-to-skin thickness were found to increase with increasing Mallampati score (p = .04, .01), whereas only tongue-to-skin thickness was loosely correlated with BMI (r = .38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized ultrasound scanning protocol demonstrates that the airway can be measured by emergency sonologists with good inter-operator reliability in all but epiglottic thickness. The measurements correlate with Mallampati score but not with BMI. Future investigation might focus on ultrasound evaluation of the airway in patients receiving airway management to determine whether ultrasound can predict challenging or abnormal airway anatomy prior to laryngoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46598,"journal":{"name":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13089-018-0083-6","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-018-0083-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Recognition of the difficult airway is a critical element of emergency practice. Mallampati score and body mass index (BMI) are not always predictive and they may be unavailable in critically ill patients. Ultrasonography provides high-resolution images that are rapidly obtainable, mobile, and non-invasive. Studies have shown correlation of ultrasound measurements with difficult laryngoscopy; however, none have been performed in the Emergency Department (ED) using a consistent scanning protocol.

Objectives: This study seeks to determine the feasibility of ultrasound measurements of the upper airway performed in the ED by emergency physicians, the inter-rater reliability of such measurements, and their relationship with Mallampati score and BMI.

Methods: A convenience sample of volunteer ED patients and healthy volunteers with no known airway issues, aged > 18 years, had images taken of their airway using a standardized ultrasound scanning protocol by two EM ultrasound fellowship trained physicians. Measurements consisted of tongue base, tongue base-to-skin, epiglottic width and thickness, and pre-epiglottic space. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to summarize measurements. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Analysis of variance with linear contrasts was used to compare measurements with Mallampati scores and linear regression with BMI.

Results: Of 39 participants, 50% were female, 50% white, 42% black, with median age 32.5 years (range 19-90), and BMI 26.0 (range 19-47). Mean ± SD for each measurement (mm) was as follows: tongue base (44.6 ± 5.1), tongue base-to-skin (60.9 ± 5.3), epiglottic width (15.0 ± 2.8) and thickness (2.0 ± 0.37), and pre-epiglottic space (11.4 ± 2.4). ICCs ranged from 0.76 to 0.88 for all measurements except epiglottis thickness (ICC = 0.57). Tongue base and tongue base-to-skin thickness were found to increase with increasing Mallampati score (p = .04, .01), whereas only tongue-to-skin thickness was loosely correlated with BMI (r = .38).

Conclusions: A standardized ultrasound scanning protocol demonstrates that the airway can be measured by emergency sonologists with good inter-operator reliability in all but epiglottic thickness. The measurements correlate with Mallampati score but not with BMI. Future investigation might focus on ultrasound evaluation of the airway in patients receiving airway management to determine whether ultrasound can predict challenging or abnormal airway anatomy prior to laryngoscopy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科超声评价气道的可行性研究。
背景:识别困难气道是急救实践的关键因素。Mallampati评分和身体质量指数(BMI)并不总是具有预测性,它们可能无法用于危重患者。超声检查提供高分辨率图像,可快速获得,移动和非侵入性。研究表明超声测量与困难喉镜检查相关;然而,没有一个在急诊科(ED)使用一致的扫描协议进行。目的:本研究旨在确定急诊医生在急诊科进行上气道超声测量的可行性,这些测量的评级间可靠性,以及它们与Mallampati评分和BMI的关系。方法:选取年龄> 18岁的自愿性急诊科患者和无已知气道问题的健康志愿者,由两名接受过EM超声奖学金培训的医生使用标准化超声扫描方案拍摄气道图像。测量包括舌底、舌底与皮肤的距离、会厌宽度和厚度以及会厌前间隙。采用均值和标准差(SD)来总结测量结果。用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估组间信度。采用线性对比方差分析比较测量值与Mallampati评分,并与BMI进行线性回归。结果:39名参与者中,50%为女性,50%为白人,42%为黑人,中位年龄32.5岁(范围19-90),BMI 26.0(范围19-47)。每项测量(mm)的平均值±标准差为:舌底(44.6±5.1),舌底与皮肤的距离(60.9±5.3),会厌宽度(15.0±2.8)和厚度(2.0±0.37),会厌前间隙(11.4±2.4)。除会厌厚度(ICC = 0.57)外,所有测量的ICC范围为0.76 ~ 0.88。舌根和舌根到皮肤的厚度随着Mallampati评分的增加而增加(p = 0.04, 0.01),而只有舌根到皮肤的厚度与BMI呈松散相关(r = 0.38)。结论:标准化的超声扫描方案表明,急诊超声医师可以测量除会厌厚度外的所有气道,操作人员之间的可靠性都很好。测量结果与Mallampati评分相关,但与BMI无关。未来的研究可能会集中在接受气道管理的患者的气道超声评估上,以确定超声是否可以预测喉镜检查前气道解剖的挑战或异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Ultrasound Journal
Critical Ultrasound Journal RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound evaluation and puncture simulation of the internal jugular vein by medical students. Interpretation errors in focused cardiac ultrasound by novice pediatric emergency medicine fellow sonologists. Mitral valve velocity time integral and passive leg raise as a measure of volume responsiveness. Diagnostic performance of abdominal point of care ultrasound performed by an emergency physician in acute right iliac fossa pain. Strain analysis for the identification of hypertensive cardiac end-organ damage in the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1