Functional Knowledge of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among Participants in a Web-Based Survey of Sexually Active Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JMIR Public Health and Surveillance Pub Date : 2018-01-23 DOI:10.2196/publichealth.8089
Erin M Kahle, Stephen Sullivan, Rob Stephenson
{"title":"Functional Knowledge of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among Participants in a Web-Based Survey of Sexually Active Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Erin M Kahle,&nbsp;Stephen Sullivan,&nbsp;Rob Stephenson","doi":"10.2196/publichealth.8089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is increasing, but little is known about the functional knowledge of PrEP and its impact on willingness to use PrEP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the functional knowledge of PrEP among a sample of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) participating in a Web-based survey of sexually active MSM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men at least 18 years old, residing in the United States, and reporting sex with a man in the previous 6 months were recruited through social networking websites. PrEP functional knowledge included the following 4 questions (1) efficacy of consistent PrEP use, (2) inconsistent PrEP use and effectiveness, (3) PrEP and condom use, and (4) effectiveness at reducing sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify respondent characteristics associated with PrEP functional knowledge. In a subsample of participants responding to HIV prevention questions, we compared willingness to use PrEP by response to PrEP functional knowledge using logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and education level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 573 respondents, PrEP knowledge was high regarding adherence (488/573, 85.2%), condom use (532/573, 92.8%), and STIs (480/573, 83.8%), but only 252/573 (44.0%) identified the correct efficacy. Lower functional PrEP knowledge was associated with minority race/ethnicity (P=.005), lower education (P=.01), and not having an HIV test in the past year (P=.02). Higher PrEP knowledge was associated with willingness to use PrEP (P=.009). Younger age was not associated with higher PrEP functional knowledge or willingness to use PrEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP knowledge was generally high in our study, including condom use and consistent use but may be lacking in higher risk MSM. The majority of respondents did not correctly identify PrEP efficacy with consistent use, which could impact motivation to seek out PrEP for HIV prevention. Targeted messaging to increase PrEP knowledge may increase PrEP use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14765,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","volume":" ","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801519/pdf/","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.8089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: Awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is increasing, but little is known about the functional knowledge of PrEP and its impact on willingness to use PrEP.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the functional knowledge of PrEP among a sample of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) participating in a Web-based survey of sexually active MSM.

Methods: Men at least 18 years old, residing in the United States, and reporting sex with a man in the previous 6 months were recruited through social networking websites. PrEP functional knowledge included the following 4 questions (1) efficacy of consistent PrEP use, (2) inconsistent PrEP use and effectiveness, (3) PrEP and condom use, and (4) effectiveness at reducing sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify respondent characteristics associated with PrEP functional knowledge. In a subsample of participants responding to HIV prevention questions, we compared willingness to use PrEP by response to PrEP functional knowledge using logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and education level.

Results: Among 573 respondents, PrEP knowledge was high regarding adherence (488/573, 85.2%), condom use (532/573, 92.8%), and STIs (480/573, 83.8%), but only 252/573 (44.0%) identified the correct efficacy. Lower functional PrEP knowledge was associated with minority race/ethnicity (P=.005), lower education (P=.01), and not having an HIV test in the past year (P=.02). Higher PrEP knowledge was associated with willingness to use PrEP (P=.009). Younger age was not associated with higher PrEP functional knowledge or willingness to use PrEP.

Conclusions: PrEP knowledge was generally high in our study, including condom use and consistent use but may be lacking in higher risk MSM. The majority of respondents did not correctly identify PrEP efficacy with consistent use, which could impact motivation to seek out PrEP for HIV prevention. Targeted messaging to increase PrEP knowledge may increase PrEP use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在性活跃的同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者的网络调查中,参与者暴露前预防艾滋病病毒的功能知识:横断面研究。
背景:暴露前预防(PrEP)对HIV预防的认识正在提高,但对PrEP的功能知识及其对使用PrEP的意愿的影响知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是评估参与性活跃男男性行为者(MSM)的同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(MSM)的PrEP功能知识。方法:通过社交网站招募年龄在18岁以上、居住在美国、在过去6个月内与男性发生过性行为的男性。PrEP功能知识包括以下4个问题(1)持续使用PrEP的有效性;(2)不一致使用PrEP和有效性;(3)PrEP和安全套的使用;(4)减少性传播感染(sti)的有效性。顺序逻辑回归用于识别与PrEP功能知识相关的被调查者特征。在回答HIV预防问题的参与者的子样本中,我们通过对PrEP功能知识的回答来比较使用PrEP的意愿,使用逻辑回归分析调整了年龄、种族和民族以及教育水平。结果:573名受访者中,PrEP知识知晓程度较高的有依从性(488/573,85.2%)、安全套使用(532/573,92.8%)和性传播感染(480/573,83.8%),但仅有252/573(44.0%)的受访者正确认识了有效性。较低的PrEP功能知识与少数民族/民族(P= 0.005)、较低的教育程度(P= 0.01)和过去一年未进行艾滋病毒检测(P= 0.02)有关。较高的PrEP知识与使用PrEP的意愿相关(P= 0.009)。结论:在我们的研究中,PrEP知识普遍较高,包括避孕套的使用和持续使用,但在高风险的MSM中可能缺乏。大多数受访者没有正确识别持续使用PrEP的有效性,这可能会影响寻求PrEP预防艾滋病毒的动机。提高预防知识的针对性信息传递可能会增加预防措施的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Public Health & Surveillance (JPHS) is a renowned scholarly journal indexed on PubMed. It follows a rigorous peer-review process and covers a wide range of disciplines. The journal distinguishes itself by its unique focus on the intersection of technology and innovation in the field of public health. JPHS delves into diverse topics such as public health informatics, surveillance systems, rapid reports, participatory epidemiology, infodemiology, infoveillance, digital disease detection, digital epidemiology, electronic public health interventions, mass media and social media campaigns, health communication, and emerging population health analysis systems and tools.
期刊最新文献
Examining Artificial Intelligence Chatbots' Responses in Providing Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Information for Young Adults: Qualitative Content Analysis. COVID-19 Information Sources and Vaccination Status Among Californian Adults by Generation Using the 2022 California Health Interview Survey: Cross-Sectional Study. Cross-Sectional Study on Oral Nicotine Product Sales Trends in Scandinavia From 2018 to 2025. Clinical Epidemiology of Cancer in People Living With HIV in Germany: Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Federated Claims Data Analysis. The Potential Impact of Federal Funding Cuts on Access to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Atlanta, Georgia: Geographic Modeling Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1