Non-enhanced CT Maximum Intensity Projections for the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions.

Austin journal of cerebrovascular disease & stroke Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-07-13
J P Ho, D T Nguyen, M Pirastefahr, R Narula, L Hailey, M Mortin, K Rapp, K Agrawal, B Huisa-Garate, R Modir, D M Meyer, T M Hemmen, B C Meyer
{"title":"Non-enhanced CT Maximum Intensity Projections for the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions.","authors":"J P Ho,&nbsp;D T Nguyen,&nbsp;M Pirastefahr,&nbsp;R Narula,&nbsp;L Hailey,&nbsp;M Mortin,&nbsp;K Rapp,&nbsp;K Agrawal,&nbsp;B Huisa-Garate,&nbsp;R Modir,&nbsp;D M Meyer,&nbsp;T M Hemmen,&nbsp;B C Meyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of large vessel occlusions (LVO) is important with recent guidelines supporting endovascular therapy in selected acute ischemic stroke patients. Many stroke centers perform CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected LVO, however this requires additional time and contrast administration. Non-enhanced CT maximum intensity projection (NECT-MIPs) may offer a rapid alternative to CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed acute stroke patients with LVO in the UCSD Stroke Registry, presenting between 6/2014-7/2016. NECT-MIPs were evaluated for presence of LVO. Gold standard comparison was to CTA. Results were stratified by level of training (Faculty, Fellow and Acute Care Practitioners [ACPs]). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 24 patients using NECT-MIPs for the detection of LVO. Faculty had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% & 92% for ICA/M1, 42% & 100% for M2, and 67% & 96% for basilar occlusions. Fellows and ACPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 61% & 94% for ICA/M1, 19% & 83% for M2, and 75% & 95% for basilar occlusions. Inter-rater agreement among Faculty readers was k=0.75 for ICA/M1, k=0.79 for M2 and k=0.14 for basilar occlusions. Among Fellows and ACPs, k=0.57 for ICA/M1, k=0.40 for M2, and k=0.27 for basilar occlusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NECT-MIPs have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LVO when compared to CTA. Inter-rater agreement is fair and higher amongst more experienced reviewers. These results suggest that NECT-MIPs may be helpful to streamline the identification of LVO and reduce door to needle and door to intervention times.</p>","PeriodicalId":90444,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of cerebrovascular disease & stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777582/pdf/nihms931537.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of cerebrovascular disease & stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identification of large vessel occlusions (LVO) is important with recent guidelines supporting endovascular therapy in selected acute ischemic stroke patients. Many stroke centers perform CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected LVO, however this requires additional time and contrast administration. Non-enhanced CT maximum intensity projection (NECT-MIPs) may offer a rapid alternative to CTA.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed acute stroke patients with LVO in the UCSD Stroke Registry, presenting between 6/2014-7/2016. NECT-MIPs were evaluated for presence of LVO. Gold standard comparison was to CTA. Results were stratified by level of training (Faculty, Fellow and Acute Care Practitioners [ACPs]). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient.

Results: We reviewed 24 patients using NECT-MIPs for the detection of LVO. Faculty had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% & 92% for ICA/M1, 42% & 100% for M2, and 67% & 96% for basilar occlusions. Fellows and ACPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 61% & 94% for ICA/M1, 19% & 83% for M2, and 75% & 95% for basilar occlusions. Inter-rater agreement among Faculty readers was k=0.75 for ICA/M1, k=0.79 for M2 and k=0.14 for basilar occlusions. Among Fellows and ACPs, k=0.57 for ICA/M1, k=0.40 for M2, and k=0.27 for basilar occlusions.

Conclusions: NECT-MIPs have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LVO when compared to CTA. Inter-rater agreement is fair and higher amongst more experienced reviewers. These results suggest that NECT-MIPs may be helpful to streamline the identification of LVO and reduce door to needle and door to intervention times.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非增强CT最大强度投影检测大血管闭塞。
背景:大血管闭塞(LVO)的识别是重要的,最近的指南支持血管内治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者。许多卒中中心对疑似LVO的患者进行CT血管造影(CTA),但这需要额外的时间和造影剂。非增强CT最大强度投影(NECT-MIPs)可作为CTA的快速替代方案。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了2014年6月至2016年7月期间在UCSD卒中登记处登记的急性卒中LVO患者。评估nect - mip是否存在LVO。黄金标准比较是CTA。结果按培训水平(教员、研究员和急性护理从业人员[acp])分层。采用Fleiss Kappa系数评估评分者之间的一致性。结果:我们回顾了24例使用ect - mips检测LVO的患者。ICA/M1的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和92%,M2的敏感性和特异性分别为42%和100%,基底动脉闭塞的敏感性和特异性分别为67%和96%。fellow和acp对ICA/M1的敏感性和特异性分别为61%和94%,对M2的敏感性和特异性分别为19%和83%,对基底动脉闭塞的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和95%。教员读者对ICA/M1的评分一致性k=0.75,对M2的评分一致性k=0.79,对基底动脉闭塞的评分一致性k=0.14。在fellow和acp中,ICA/M1的k=0.57, M2的k=0.40,基底动脉闭塞的k=0.27。结论:与CTA相比,ect - mips检测LVO具有较高的敏感性和特异性。在更有经验的评论者中,评价者之间的协议是公平的,并且更高。这些结果表明,NECT-MIPs可能有助于简化LVO的识别,减少从门到针和从门到干预的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioinformatic Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes and Pathways in Intracranial Aneurysm Elevated Plasma Factor VIII in Non-Pyogenic Cerebral Venous Thrombosis after Head Trauma without Skull Fracture Elevated Lipocalin-2 Can Indicate the Vascular Inflammation in Patients with Ischemic Stroke The Effect of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio on Prognosis in Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Retrospective Study Factors Influencing Acute Stroke Thrombolytic Treatments in Hispanics In the San Diego Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1