Auditing the Assignments of Top-Level Semantic Types in the UMLS Semantic Network to UMLS Concepts.

Zhe He, Yehoshua Perl, Gai Elhanan, Yan Chen, James Geller, Jiang Bian
{"title":"Auditing the Assignments of Top-Level Semantic Types in the UMLS Semantic Network to UMLS Concepts.","authors":"Zhe He,&nbsp;Yehoshua Perl,&nbsp;Gai Elhanan,&nbsp;Yan Chen,&nbsp;James Geller,&nbsp;Jiang Bian","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) is an important terminological system. By the policy of its curators, each concept of the UMLS should be assigned the most specific Semantic Types (STs) in the UMLS Semantic Network (SN). Hence, the Semantic Types of most UMLS concepts are assigned at or near the bottom (leaves) of the UMLS Semantic Network. While most ST assignments are correct, some errors do occur. Therefore, Quality Assurance efforts of UMLS curators for ST assignments should concentrate on automatically detected sets of UMLS concepts with higher error rates than random sets. In this paper, we investigate the assignments of top-level semantic types in the UMLS semantic network to concepts, identify potential erroneous assignments, define four categories of errors, and thus provide assistance to curators of the UMLS to avoid these assignments errors. Human experts analyzed samples of concepts assigned 10 of the top-level semantic types and categorized the erroneous ST assignments into these four logical categories. Two thirds of the concepts assigned these 10 top-level semantic types are erroneous. Our results demonstrate that reviewing top-level semantic type assignments to concepts provides an effective way for UMLS quality assurance, comparing to reviewing a random selection of semantic type assignments.</p>","PeriodicalId":74563,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","volume":"2017 ","pages":"1262-1269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217840","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) is an important terminological system. By the policy of its curators, each concept of the UMLS should be assigned the most specific Semantic Types (STs) in the UMLS Semantic Network (SN). Hence, the Semantic Types of most UMLS concepts are assigned at or near the bottom (leaves) of the UMLS Semantic Network. While most ST assignments are correct, some errors do occur. Therefore, Quality Assurance efforts of UMLS curators for ST assignments should concentrate on automatically detected sets of UMLS concepts with higher error rates than random sets. In this paper, we investigate the assignments of top-level semantic types in the UMLS semantic network to concepts, identify potential erroneous assignments, define four categories of errors, and thus provide assistance to curators of the UMLS to avoid these assignments errors. Human experts analyzed samples of concepts assigned 10 of the top-level semantic types and categorized the erroneous ST assignments into these four logical categories. Two thirds of the concepts assigned these 10 top-level semantic types are erroneous. Our results demonstrate that reviewing top-level semantic type assignments to concepts provides an effective way for UMLS quality assurance, comparing to reviewing a random selection of semantic type assignments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计UMLS语义网络中顶层语义类型对UMLS概念的赋值。
医学统一语言系统(UMLS)是一个重要的术语系统。根据其管理者的政策,UMLS的每个概念都应该被分配到UMLS语义网络(SN)中最具体的语义类型(STs)。因此,大多数UMLS概念的语义类型被分配在UMLS语义网络的底部或接近底部(叶子)。虽然大多数ST赋值是正确的,但也会出现一些错误。因此,对于ST作业,UMLS管理员的质量保证工作应该集中在自动检测的错误率高于随机集的UMLS概念集上。在本文中,我们研究了UMLS语义网络中顶层语义类型对概念的分配,识别了潜在的错误分配,定义了四类错误,从而为UMLS的管理者提供了帮助,以避免这些分配错误。人类专家分析了分配给10种顶级语义类型的概念样本,并将错误的ST分配分为这四个逻辑类别。分配给这10个顶级语义类型的概念中有三分之二是错误的。我们的研究结果表明,与随机选择语义类型分配相比,审查概念的顶层语义类型分配为UMLS质量保证提供了一种有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting Lung Cancer Health Disparity between African American Males and European American Males. Causal Explanation from Mild Cognitive Impairment Progression using Graph Neural Networks. Predicting HIV Diagnosis Among Emerging Adults Using Electronic Health Records and Health Survey Data in All of Us Research Program. A generalizable physiological model for detection of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia using Federated Learning. Harnessing Transfer Learning for Dementia Prediction: Leveraging Sex-Different Mild Cognitive Impairment Prognosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1