A Scoping Review of Health Outcomes Examined in Randomized Controlled Trials Using Guided Imagery.

Peter R Giacobbi, Jonathan Stewart, Keeley Chaffee, Anna-Marie Jaeschke, Meagan Stabler, George A Kelley
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Health Outcomes Examined in Randomized Controlled Trials Using Guided Imagery.","authors":"Peter R Giacobbi, Jonathan Stewart, Keeley Chaffee, Anna-Marie Jaeschke, Meagan Stabler, George A Kelley","doi":"10.1097/pp9.0000000000000010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Guided imagery involves the controlled visualization of detailed mental images. This integrative health technique is used for healing, health maintenance, or the treatment of specific conditions. Guided imagery is an integral part of mindfulness meditation, hypnosis, and various relaxation exercises. However, evidence to support the widespread use and dissemination of guided imagery interventions has been lacking. The purposes of this scoping review were to document the scope of health outcomes and disease processes examined by guided imagery researchers and the journal outlets where this work has been published. Secondary purposes were to review the efficacy of guided imagery, risk of bias from studies published in selected integrative health journals, and gain feedback from clinicians in a practiced-based research network (PBRN) about potential barriers for use in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten bibliographic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1960 and 2013 that included adult participants. Descriptive and analytic methods were employed to document the journal outlets, diseases, and health outcomes investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>320 RCTs that included more than 17,979 adult participants were reviewed. The published studies appeared in 216 peer-reviewed journals from diverse disciplines largely representing psychology, the sport sciences, rehabilitation, nursing, and medicine. Major outcomes observed were coping with pain, stroke recovery, anxiety, coping with stress, and sport skills. Practitioner feedback from the PBRN revealed some interest but skepticism and time constraints were discussed as barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ongoing research and creative dissemination techniques are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":92284,"journal":{"name":"Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"2 7","pages":"e0010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pp9.0000000000000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Guided imagery involves the controlled visualization of detailed mental images. This integrative health technique is used for healing, health maintenance, or the treatment of specific conditions. Guided imagery is an integral part of mindfulness meditation, hypnosis, and various relaxation exercises. However, evidence to support the widespread use and dissemination of guided imagery interventions has been lacking. The purposes of this scoping review were to document the scope of health outcomes and disease processes examined by guided imagery researchers and the journal outlets where this work has been published. Secondary purposes were to review the efficacy of guided imagery, risk of bias from studies published in selected integrative health journals, and gain feedback from clinicians in a practiced-based research network (PBRN) about potential barriers for use in clinical settings.

Methods: Ten bibliographic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1960 and 2013 that included adult participants. Descriptive and analytic methods were employed to document the journal outlets, diseases, and health outcomes investigated.

Results: 320 RCTs that included more than 17,979 adult participants were reviewed. The published studies appeared in 216 peer-reviewed journals from diverse disciplines largely representing psychology, the sport sciences, rehabilitation, nursing, and medicine. Major outcomes observed were coping with pain, stroke recovery, anxiety, coping with stress, and sport skills. Practitioner feedback from the PBRN revealed some interest but skepticism and time constraints were discussed as barriers.

Conclusions: Ongoing research and creative dissemination techniques are warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用引导式想象对随机对照试验中的健康结果进行范围审查。
简介引导想象包括有控制地想象出详细的心理图像。这种综合保健技术可用于治疗、维护健康或治疗特定病症。引导想象是正念冥想、催眠和各种放松练习中不可或缺的一部分。然而,引导式意象干预的广泛使用和传播一直缺乏证据支持。本次范围界定综述的目的是记录引导式意象疗法研究人员所研究的健康结果和疾病过程的范围,以及发表这些研究成果的期刊。次要目的是回顾引导式意象疗法的疗效、在选定的综合健康期刊上发表的研究的偏倚风险,并从基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)中的临床医生那里获得有关在临床环境中使用引导式意象疗法的潜在障碍的反馈意见:方法: 在 10 个文献数据库中搜索了 1960 年至 2013 年间发表的包含成人参与者的随机对照试验 (RCT)。采用了描述性和分析性方法来记录所调查的期刊刊物、疾病和健康结果:结果:共审查了 320 项 RCT,其中包括超过 17,979 名成年参与者。发表在 216 份同行评审期刊上的研究报告涉及多个学科,主要包括心理学、运动科学、康复学、护理学和医学。观察到的主要结果包括疼痛应对、中风恢复、焦虑、压力应对和运动技能。来自 PBRN 的从业人员反馈显示了一些兴趣,但怀疑和时间限制被认为是障碍:结论:有必要继续开展研究并采用创新的传播技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Toward Prevention of Adverse Events Using Anticipatory Analytics Cross-sectional Study on the Knowledge and Prevalence of PCOS at a Multiethnic University How Much Sodium Should We Eat? Family Functioning and Psychosocial Factors in a Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Pilot for Black Men The 3 Curcuminoid Analogs Comprising the Curcumin Extract Comparably Inhibit Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer Activation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1